Danny_Labrador
Well-Known Member
Not making a point about suitability but the RNLI site is worth a look and the video of Shannon - On-board View of Rough Trials is good viewing.
Not making a point about suitability but the RNLI site is worth a look and the video of Shannon - On-board View of Rough Trials is good viewing.
I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these ages.
Got a link, all I get is the map of the Med?
Just don't understand the whinging gits on here who are always mumbling on about the RNLI.........
They should be bloody grateful that it exists!!!
If it depended on funding from the current bunch of tw@ts in Downing street, it wouldn't exist.
One thing I am certain of, if the detractors were floundering around in the freezing briny, and the old blue and orange came and scooped them up, they wouldn't give a rats ass about their petty whinges then.
I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these ages.
I have often criticised the RNLI compared with the French SNSM. Please note I do not criticise the crews or the volunteers.
Now here is a comparison of two boats :
The new Shannon Class due for delivery in Spring next year
http://rnli.org/newlifeboatappeal/s...m_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Take-a-video-tour
and its nearest equivalent in France :
Vedette Classe 1 (VC1)
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichie...nt_parAudierne_et_Loctudy_P1050878.JPG_-1.JPG
Dimensions in metres : SHANNON 13.6 x 4.54 x 0.75 -x- VC1 14.6 x 4.60 x 1.35
Speed in knots : SHANNON 25 -x- VC1 22
Range in nm : SHANNON 250 -x- VC1 360 (@ 18kts)
Engines : SHANNON 2 x 510 hp -x- VC1 2 x 500 hp
Transmission : SHANNON water jets -x- VC1 shafts
COST : SHANNON £ 1 500 000 -x- VC1 £ 534 000 (€670 000)
The main differences appear to be the water jets on the Shannon compared with a bulbous bow on the VC1 which apparently greatly improves the performance.
Why should the budgets be so totally different for similar sized boats ? In fact the French boat is bigger, has a greater range but costs a third of the RNLI boat.
Could the two organizations not get together to jointly develop boats with all the synergy that that would entail?
i wouldn't worry too much, i dont think fishermen can read.
well, if their understanding of colregs is anything to go by.
sorry op, t.d.
£1 000 000 for a trailer? you got to be kidding.
i take point about horses for courses but its a glorified jet ski and i would have thought it should be a bit cheaper than that.
still that pales into insignificance when you see where the gravy boat really leads:
from the 2011 accounts
The following number of employees received emoluments in excess of £60,000:
2011
Number
£60,000–£69,999 20
£70,000–£79,999 14
£80,000–£89,999 3
£90,000–£99,999 1
£100,000–£109,999 1
£110,000–£119,999 2
£120,000–£129,999 2
£130,000–£139,999 1
Total 44
Seven (2010: eight) employees who received emoluments in excess of £60,000 are members of the defined contribution scheme
and received employer contributions of £82,393 (2010: £88,714) in total. The remaining 35 (2010: 36) employees are members of the
defined benefit pension scheme.
thats a cool £3 700 000
still, thats ok cos' they make savings by not paying the crews
You just have no idea, do you? I did point out that it is a fully submersible tractor & turntable unit capable of operating off beaches at any state of the tide over mud, sand or shingle. It is not just a trailer, and I suspect you are entirely clear about that but choose to tell lies to discredit them. It actually discredits you.
And the salaries? Compare them with any equivalent large company & I think you will find they are below average for the responsibilities undertaken. So stop your petty mis-information & try doing something useful for a change.
The RNLI are not above criticism, but it does need to be honest, true & reasonable if it is to help improve them. Your childish rants appear to be far from that. What did the RNLI do to you to be dissed in this manner?
Unfortunately the RNLI wants to be a rescue super power and (tries) to keep everything in house. I understand that this removes the 'unreliable' outside contractor, but...
It is top heavy with managers, office staff, etc. If you are ever on the inside the amount of money wasted is incredible.
Someone once said if the RNLI wanted a dog they would take a cat and redesign it into one.
A lot of people forget the mostly volunteer crews when they see stuff like this.
PW
This thread started 'if I were a donor', well shame on him, I can't believe that any yachty would NOT want to donate, quite frankly.
Without doubt the RNLI is one of the best equiped rescue services in the world and the crews (not all volunteers, but most) are some of the best trained in the world; and they risk their lives in the seas around the UK, which are some of the most treacherous in the world (I'm not talking the Solent here)......and it doesn't cost the UK tax payer a penny.........or even the people being rescued.
Can you imagine what it would be like if was run by a government department? As good......I think not.
Communities around the UK find their lifeboat stations focus and galvanize community spirit within them, even though many of them have poor economic opportunities, much poverty and are unable to get on the property ladder due to inflated prices caused by second home ownership.
Perhaps some of our other emergency services, eg, the Fire Service could be run under the same model.........
Firstly, it would save the Gov. an awful lot of money in equipment, property, salaries, etc, etc,.........and the huge cost of 'early retirement' on dubious health grounds which has been endemic in the service in recent years.
There would be NO strikes or threat of strikes and it would provide a positive focus for inner-city communities, eg, the youf wouldn't throw stones at fire engines attending an emergency as their brothers, sisters, dads, uncles & aunties would be on the crew.....instead they'd be proudly polishing the darn things and collecting donations!
What a marvelous world it would be......
I think you will find that includes the entire launch & recover system with submersible caterpillar turntable trailer & tractor.
What bollix is that? The two boats are designed for two completely different functions. The French boat SIMPLY COULD NOT do what the Shannon is designed to do, it just would not be fit for purpose.
The Shannon is designed for shallow water use with beach launch & recovery cos many of our most dangerous stretches of coastline are sandbank infested & without sheltered deep water harbours. In addition, the jets offer extreme manouverability for close to shore & casualty working. Many UK rescues happen close inshoer &/or in shallow water.
The extra 7 kts is around 35% extra speed, which will reduce response times significantly & can easily make the difference between rescueing a living casualty & recovering a dead body. The density of stations around the UK coast generally means that the extra range is not needed.
So, French boats presumably meet French needs & the Shannon meets ours.
Got a link, all I get is the map of the Med?
Just don't understand the whinging gits on here who are always mumbling on about the RNLI.........
They should be bloody grateful that it exists!!!
If it depended on funding from the current bunch of tw@ts in Downing street, it wouldn't exist.
One thing I am certain of, if the detractors were floundering around in the freezing briny, and the old blue and orange came and scooped them up, they wouldn't give a rats ass about their petty whinges then.
I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these pages.
If it is £2.5M that seems OK compared to the prices people pay for the large Sealine/Fairline boats.
After all the RNLI boat has to go out in all weathers and be able to self right should it be unfortunate enough to be knocked over. Not only that but the engines have to start again. I suspect building a boat to do that alone is rather expensive let alone all the other features it has such as being able to launch / recover from a beach..
I have no doubt there is a lot of waste in the organistation but we are not forced to donate if we feel strongly re that. In any case as far as I can tell the money goes to jobs in the UK so that has to be a good thing.
What the OP misses is that this is the RNLI's latedt design, the equivalent froggie one will also cast 1.5M and is not even designed for carriage launch. Many of the Froggie boats are only available half the time as they dont have carriage lauch and the boats are only available when the lock gates on the marina are open
I opened making the pouint that my comments were not directed at crews and volunteers.
What I am saying is that the French provide essentially the same services and the shouts and lives saved are in the same ball-park. They do this with an operating budget which is about 10% that of the RNLI.
They do it without paying a central adminstration of 42 people being paid more than £60k and by building very efficient boats which cost a third of the nearest RNLI equivalent. Who wants a Rolls Royce if a Ford does the job adequately?
This thread started 'if I were a donor', well shame on him, I can't believe that any yachty would NOT want to donate, quite frankly.
Without doubt the RNLI is one of the best equiped rescue services in the world and the crews (not all volunteers, but most) are some of the best trained in the world;