If I were an RNLI donor I would not be happy.

Not making a point about suitability but the RNLI site is worth a look and the video of Shannon - On-board View of Rough Trials is good viewing.

Got a link, all I get is the map of the Med?

Just don't understand the whinging gits on here who are always mumbling on about the RNLI.........

They should be bloody grateful that it exists!!!

If it depended on funding from the current bunch of tw@ts in Downing street, it wouldn't exist.

One thing I am certain of, if the detractors were floundering around in the freezing briny, and the old blue and orange came and scooped them up, they wouldn't give a rats ass about their petty whinges then.

I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these pages.
 
Last edited:
I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these ages.

i wouldn't worry too much, i dont think fishermen can read.

well, if their understanding of colregs is anything to go by.

sorry op, t.d.
 
Got a link, all I get is the map of the Med?

Just don't understand the whinging gits on here who are always mumbling on about the RNLI.........

They should be bloody grateful that it exists!!!

If it depended on funding from the current bunch of tw@ts in Downing street, it wouldn't exist.

One thing I am certain of, if the detractors were floundering around in the freezing briny, and the old blue and orange came and scooped them up, they wouldn't give a rats ass about their petty whinges then.

I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these ages.

Its here see the video links
 
I have often criticised the RNLI compared with the French SNSM. Please note I do not criticise the crews or the volunteers.

Now here is a comparison of two boats :

The new Shannon Class due for delivery in Spring next year

http://rnli.org/newlifeboatappeal/s...m_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Take-a-video-tour


and its nearest equivalent in France :

Vedette Classe 1 (VC1)

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichie...nt_parAudierne_et_Loctudy_P1050878.JPG_-1.JPG


Dimensions in metres : SHANNON 13.6 x 4.54 x 0.75 -x- VC1 14.6 x 4.60 x 1.35

Speed in knots : SHANNON 25 -x- VC1 22

Range in nm : SHANNON 250 -x- VC1 360 (@ 18kts)

Engines : SHANNON 2 x 510 hp -x- VC1 2 x 500 hp

Transmission : SHANNON water jets -x- VC1 shafts

COST : SHANNON £ 1 500 000 -x- VC1 £ 534 000 (€670 000)

The main differences appear to be the water jets on the Shannon compared with a bulbous bow on the VC1 which apparently greatly improves the performance.

Why should the budgets be so totally different for similar sized boats ? In fact the French boat is bigger, has a greater range but costs a third of the RNLI boat.

Could the two organizations not get together to jointly develop boats with all the synergy that that would entail?

Another waste, look at what the RNLI sell their boats at compared to building costs for their gold-plated vessels.
 
Actually, to me it looks cheap at those price...

"from the 2011 accounts - The following number of employees received emoluments in excess of £60,000:
Number
£60,000–£69,999 20
£70,000–£79,999 14
£80,000–£89,999 3
£90,000–£99,999 1
£100,000–£109,999 1
£110,000–£119,999 2
£120,000–£129,999 2
£130,000–£139,999 1 "

Given the size/complexity/turnover/operations area of the RNLI as an organisation and assuming that the £130-140k salary is going to their MD/Chief Exec. I reckon that he could probably be earning far more elsewhere for doing a similar job. Looking at the rest of the figures on the list too, it strikes me that their Directors, Department-Heads, Professional Fundraisers and the like are all earning salaries at or even below, the current 'market-rate'.
 
£1 000 000 for a trailer? you got to be kidding.
i take point about horses for courses but its a glorified jet ski and i would have thought it should be a bit cheaper than that.
still that pales into insignificance when you see where the gravy boat really leads:

from the 2011 accounts


The following number of employees received emoluments in excess of £60,000:
2011

Number
£60,000–£69,999 20
£70,000–£79,999 14
£80,000–£89,999 3
£90,000–£99,999 1
£100,000–£109,999 1
£110,000–£119,999 2
£120,000–£129,999 2
£130,000–£139,999 1
Total 44
Seven (2010: eight) employees who received emoluments in excess of £60,000 are members of the defined contribution scheme
and received employer contributions of £82,393 (2010: £88,714) in total. The remaining 35 (2010: 36) employees are members of the
defined benefit pension scheme.

thats a cool £3 700 000

still, thats ok cos' they make savings by not paying the crews

You just have no idea, do you? I did point out that it is a fully submersible tractor & turntable unit capable of operating off beaches at any state of the tide over mud, sand or shingle. It is not just a trailer, and I suspect you are entirely clear about that but choose to tell lies to discredit them. It actually discredits you.

And the salaries? Compare them with any equivalent large company & I think you will find they are below average for the responsibilities undertaken. So stop your petty mis-information & try doing something useful for a change.

The RNLI are not above criticism, but it does need to be honest, true & reasonable if it is to help improve them. Your childish rants appear to be far from that. What did the RNLI do to you to be dissed in this manner?
 
You just have no idea, do you? I did point out that it is a fully submersible tractor & turntable unit capable of operating off beaches at any state of the tide over mud, sand or shingle. It is not just a trailer, and I suspect you are entirely clear about that but choose to tell lies to discredit them. It actually discredits you.

And the salaries? Compare them with any equivalent large company & I think you will find they are below average for the responsibilities undertaken. So stop your petty mis-information & try doing something useful for a change.

The RNLI are not above criticism, but it does need to be honest, true & reasonable if it is to help improve them. Your childish rants appear to be far from that. What did the RNLI do to you to be dissed in this manner?

I know what they should do to him, hopefully just when he needs them most!
 
This thread started 'if I were a donor', well shame on him, I can't believe that any yachty would NOT want to donate, quite frankly.

Without doubt the RNLI is one of the best equiped rescue services in the world and the crews (not all volunteers, but most) are some of the best trained in the world; and they risk their lives in the seas around the UK, which are some of the most treacherous in the world (I'm not talking the Solent here)......and it doesn't cost the UK tax payer a penny.........or even the people being rescued.

Can you imagine what it would be like if was run by a government department? As good......I think not.

Communities around the UK find their lifeboat stations focus and galvanize community spirit within them, even though many of them have poor economic opportunities, much poverty and are unable to get on the property ladder due to inflated prices caused by second home ownership.

Perhaps some of our other emergency services, eg, the Fire Service could be run under the same model.........

Firstly, it would save the Gov. an awful lot of money in equipment, property, salaries, etc, etc,.........and the huge cost of 'early retirement' on dubious health grounds which has been endemic in the service in recent years.

There would be NO strikes or threat of strikes and it would provide a positive focus for inner-city communities, eg, the youf wouldn't throw stones at fire engines attending an emergency as their brothers, sisters, dads, uncles & aunties would be on the crew.....instead they'd be proudly polishing the darn things and collecting donations!

What a marvelous world it would be......
 
Unfortunately the RNLI wants to be a rescue super power and (tries) to keep everything in house. I understand that this removes the 'unreliable' outside contractor, but...

It is top heavy with managers, office staff, etc. If you are ever on the inside the amount of money wasted is incredible.

Someone once said if the RNLI wanted a dog they would take a cat and redesign it into one.

A lot of people forget the mostly volunteer crews when they see stuff like this.

PW

Salaried personnel : SNSM 70 RNLI 1691 of whom 42 earn more than £60 000 pa
 
This thread started 'if I were a donor', well shame on him, I can't believe that any yachty would NOT want to donate, quite frankly.

Without doubt the RNLI is one of the best equiped rescue services in the world and the crews (not all volunteers, but most) are some of the best trained in the world; and they risk their lives in the seas around the UK, which are some of the most treacherous in the world (I'm not talking the Solent here)......and it doesn't cost the UK tax payer a penny.........or even the people being rescued.

Can you imagine what it would be like if was run by a government department? As good......I think not.

Communities around the UK find their lifeboat stations focus and galvanize community spirit within them, even though many of them have poor economic opportunities, much poverty and are unable to get on the property ladder due to inflated prices caused by second home ownership.

Perhaps some of our other emergency services, eg, the Fire Service could be run under the same model.........

Firstly, it would save the Gov. an awful lot of money in equipment, property, salaries, etc, etc,.........and the huge cost of 'early retirement' on dubious health grounds which has been endemic in the service in recent years.

There would be NO strikes or threat of strikes and it would provide a positive focus for inner-city communities, eg, the youf wouldn't throw stones at fire engines attending an emergency as their brothers, sisters, dads, uncles & aunties would be on the crew.....instead they'd be proudly polishing the darn things and collecting donations!

What a marvelous world it would be......

Here in Portugal the Bombieros (firemen) are volunteers in this area. They also provide the ambulance service too.
 
I think you will find that includes the entire launch & recover system with submersible caterpillar turntable trailer & tractor.



What bollix is that? The two boats are designed for two completely different functions. The French boat SIMPLY COULD NOT do what the Shannon is designed to do, it just would not be fit for purpose.

The Shannon is designed for shallow water use with beach launch & recovery cos many of our most dangerous stretches of coastline are sandbank infested & without sheltered deep water harbours. In addition, the jets offer extreme manouverability for close to shore & casualty working. Many UK rescues happen close inshoer &/or in shallow water.

The extra 7 kts is around 35% extra speed, which will reduce response times significantly & can easily make the difference between rescueing a living casualty & recovering a dead body. The density of stations around the UK coast generally means that the extra range is not needed.

So, French boats presumably meet French needs & the Shannon meets ours.

The speed difference is about 3 knts; the 18knts quoted was with respect to the range of 360nm.

I wonder with storm force wind and waves breaking on a shore would a 2' difference in draft make that much difference? Anyway the French boat carries a 3m80 RIB for that sort of situation.

And you could do a lot with the extra £1m, two more boats for instance.
 
There are very few organisations which I feel should be unaccountable, but the RNLI is one of them.

Frankly I don't care how agressive their marketing and fund raising techniques are or what they spend redecorating their shops.

So the boats they design themselves cost 3 times that the French use, whats your point caller ? I want the men and women who are prepared to risk their lives so we can all go out have fun and cock about in boats, to have the very best equipment available to them.

If the powers that be within the RNLI think spending £1.5m on an offshore rescue craft is the correct decision, good on them, I'll happily send you a few quid to get it made.

To complain about the salaries that members of staff within this organisation receive simply beggers belief. Its easy to be churlish sitting safely on your sofa, lets see if you still think the same if your yacht is ever knocked down and you have to reach for channel 16.

Sybarite hang your head in shame, stop complaining about the corporate inefficiencies and send them some money.
 
Last edited:
Got a link, all I get is the map of the Med?

Just don't understand the whinging gits on here who are always mumbling on about the RNLI.........

They should be bloody grateful that it exists!!!

If it depended on funding from the current bunch of tw@ts in Downing street, it wouldn't exist.

One thing I am certain of, if the detractors were floundering around in the freezing briny, and the old blue and orange came and scooped them up, they wouldn't give a rats ass about their petty whinges then.

I wonder sometimes what the RNLI crews think when they read some of the bollix tapped out on here? Some of them are full time fishermen, who also have to bear the brunt of yotty angst within these pages.


I opened making the pouint that my comments were not directed at crews and volunteers.

What I am saying is that the French provide essentially the same services and the shouts and lives saved are in the same ball-park. They do this with an operating budget which is about 10% that of the RNLI.

They do it without paying a central adminstration of 42 people being paid more than £60k and by building very efficient boats which cost a third of the nearest RNLI equivalent. Who wants a Rolls Royce if a Ford does the job adequately?
 
If it is £2.5M that seems OK compared to the prices people pay for the large Sealine/Fairline boats.

After all the RNLI boat has to go out in all weathers and be able to self right should it be unfortunate enough to be knocked over. Not only that but the engines have to start again. I suspect building a boat to do that alone is rather expensive let alone all the other features it has such as being able to launch / recover from a beach..

French boats have the same requirements.

I have no doubt there is a lot of waste in the organistation but we are not forced to donate if we feel strongly re that. In any case as far as I can tell the money goes to jobs in the UK so that has to be a good thing.

That is a perfectly reasoned point of view. As long as you know what you are contributing for and that other models exist.
 
What the OP misses is that this is the RNLI's latedt design, the equivalent froggie one will also cast 1.5M and is not even designed for carriage launch. Many of the Froggie boats are only available half the time as they dont have carriage lauch and the boats are only available when the lock gates on the marina are open

If you believe that you will believe anything.
 
I opened making the pouint that my comments were not directed at crews and volunteers.

What I am saying is that the French provide essentially the same services and the shouts and lives saved are in the same ball-park. They do this with an operating budget which is about 10% that of the RNLI.

They do it without paying a central adminstration of 42 people being paid more than £60k and by building very efficient boats which cost a third of the nearest RNLI equivalent. Who wants a Rolls Royce if a Ford does the job adequately?

What's it to you, according to your profile you live in France but you whinge on about a British rescue service that most of us are very happy with and speaking for myself, very proud of!

To be honest, I am starting to find your posts on this a tad offensive.
 
This thread started 'if I were a donor', well shame on him, I can't believe that any yachty would NOT want to donate, quite frankly.

As I'm a French resident, my donations are here. I would have thought that any donor would want to know that his or her donation was being effectively used. In France the service, including the administration, is on a volunteer basis.



Without doubt the RNLI is one of the best equiped rescue services in the world and the crews (not all volunteers, but most) are some of the best trained in the world;

What is the basis for your belief that they are better trained than the French?

Equipment : is more expensive better or would better be having three times more for the same price?
 
Top