Cardinal
Active member
At least you might tell us where it is so that we can anchor elsewhere. SW of the pier or NE of the pier?Oh bugger. Should I go back and look for it?
Last edited:
At least you might tell us where it is so that we can anchor elsewhere. SW of the pier or NE of the pier?Oh bugger. Should I go back and look for it?
Dragged out of position by another VulcanPerhaps one of the rocks from ‘Rocky Area’ went for a little walk
<pedantry>The rock around there is Olivine Basalt, not granite. Totally different stuff!</pedantry>Oh, duh - I was focussed on the lump of granite (at the time and when posting).
Go to the top of the class.
Excellent! I was hoping to be educated/corrected.<pedantry>The rock around there is Olivine Basalt, not granite. Totally different stuff!</pedantry>
Then you have come to the wrong placeExcellent! I was hoping to be educated/corrected.
The right place to be corrected but not necessarily in the right directionThen you have come to the wrong place
As in Eric Morecambe's response to André Previn "All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order"?The right place to be corrected but not necessarily in the right direction
Did you check how close the nearest granite might be-from whence this rock may have been dragged?As in Eric Morecambe's response to André Previn "All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order"?
To reassure others, my degree is geology and I checked the British Geological Survey app that gives access to geological maps for the UK!
It's doomed.This anchor thread is turning into an anchor thread
My interpretation and use is to drop anchor to seabed, pay out 4xdepth as boat is taken down by wind, and then apply power to dig in. If not enough wind, very gentle astern to draw chain out as boat moves.Can someone explain the setting process for the Rocna as from what I read it seems to imply that you do not set it in the "conventional" manner by applying gradually increasing power in reverse. I can only interpret the method as allowing wind and or tide to the work. Having managed in the past for more years than I care to think about to anchor with a CQR without loss of life or vessels I am becoming intrigued in a purely academic way of understanding the methodology and benefits of these modern anchors.
I admit I didn't. But "upstream" (glaciologically speaking) are the Cuillins, which are Gabbro (the intrusive version of Basalt). There are possible sources of granite, but there are far more sources of basic rocks. In that area, basalts and Gabbros are more likely. That isn't to say that Granite is impossible, and of course, in an anchorage there's always the possibility of a vessel discharging ballast stone which could have come from anywhere! But there's certainly no source very close, taking into account the direction of glacial flow.Did you check how close the nearest granite might be-from whence this rock may have been dragged?
This thread is becoming rather erraticI admit I didn't. But "upstream" (glaciologically speaking) are the Cuillins, which are Gabbro (the intrusive version of Basalt). There are possible sources of granite, but there are far more sources of basic rocks. In that area, basalts and Gabbros are more likely. That isn't to say that Granite is impossible, and of course, in an anchorage there's always the possibility of a vessel discharging ballast stone which could have come from anywhere! But there's certainly no source very close, taking into account the direction of glacial flow.
But I meant my comment in a spirit of light-hearted pedantry, to uphold the reputation of the forum!
Nowt wrong with a bit of erraticism among friends.This thread is becoming rather erratic