I got a Rockna today

srm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2004
Messages
3,248
Location
Azores, Terceira.
Visit site
Had a similar experience many years ago with a 50Kg Bruce patent anchor on a fishing boat. Recovered a slab of rock about the size of a tomb stone plus a smaller rock acting as a wedge against the shank. Fortunately the winch was driven by a belt off the engine so no problem getting it all to the surface.
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,538
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
The right place to be corrected but not necessarily in the right direction :rolleyes:
As in Eric Morecambe's response to André Previn "All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order"?

To reassure others, my degree is geology and I checked the British Geological Survey app that gives access to geological maps for the UK!
 

Cardinal

Active member
Joined
15 Nov 2006
Messages
414
Location
Ardfern
Visit site
As in Eric Morecambe's response to André Previn "All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order"?

To reassure others, my degree is geology and I checked the British Geological Survey app that gives access to geological maps for the UK!
Did you check how close the nearest granite might be-from whence this rock may have been dragged?
 
Last edited:

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,404
Visit site
If you put a hinge on that anchor the head will tilt and the rock will fall off. CQRs have done this for decades, nothing gets stuck in a CQR, especially seabeds!
 

Fr J Hackett

Well-known member
Joined
26 Dec 2001
Messages
66,612
Location
Saou
Visit site
Can someone explain the setting process for the Rocna as from what I read it seems to imply that you do not set it in the "conventional" manner by applying gradually increasing power in reverse. I can only interpret the method as allowing wind and or tide to the work. Having managed in the past for more years than I care to think about to anchor with a CQR without loss of life or vessels I am becoming intrigued in a purely academic way of understanding the methodology and benefits of these modern anchors.
 

jlavery

Well-known member
Joined
25 Oct 2020
Messages
643
Visit site
Can someone explain the setting process for the Rocna as from what I read it seems to imply that you do not set it in the "conventional" manner by applying gradually increasing power in reverse. I can only interpret the method as allowing wind and or tide to the work. Having managed in the past for more years than I care to think about to anchor with a CQR without loss of life or vessels I am becoming intrigued in a purely academic way of understanding the methodology and benefits of these modern anchors.
My interpretation and use is to drop anchor to seabed, pay out 4xdepth as boat is taken down by wind, and  then apply power to dig in. If not enough wind, very gentle astern to draw chain out as boat moves.

Pertinent point being get scope out before digging in, and not dragging it along the bottom while paying out. (TBH this is what most of us have done with CQRs too, I reckon).
 

Cardinal

Active member
Joined
15 Nov 2006
Messages
414
Location
Ardfern
Visit site
Conventional method seems appropriate in my experience. That would include extra care when there is believed to be kelp or similar on the seabed.
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,538
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
Did you check how close the nearest granite might be-from whence this rock may have been dragged?
I admit I didn't. But "upstream" (glaciologically speaking) are the Cuillins, which are Gabbro (the intrusive version of Basalt). There are possible sources of granite, but there are far more sources of basic rocks. In that area, basalts and Gabbros are more likely. That isn't to say that Granite is impossible, and of course, in an anchorage there's always the possibility of a vessel discharging ballast stone which could have come from anywhere! But there's certainly no source very close, taking into account the direction of glacial flow.

But I meant my comment in a spirit of light-hearted pedantry, to uphold the reputation of the forum!
 

Fr J Hackett

Well-known member
Joined
26 Dec 2001
Messages
66,612
Location
Saou
Visit site
I admit I didn't. But "upstream" (glaciologically speaking) are the Cuillins, which are Gabbro (the intrusive version of Basalt). There are possible sources of granite, but there are far more sources of basic rocks. In that area, basalts and Gabbros are more likely. That isn't to say that Granite is impossible, and of course, in an anchorage there's always the possibility of a vessel discharging ballast stone which could have come from anywhere! But there's certainly no source very close, taking into account the direction of glacial flow.

But I meant my comment in a spirit of light-hearted pedantry, to uphold the reputation of the forum!
This thread is becoming rather erratic
 
Top