Fat Freddie
New Member
I am taking my boat across the atlantic next year and want to extend my first aid kit with anti-biotics and possibly morphine. Does anyone know how I can legally obtain these prescription drugs?
...This is from a US news source.
"Asset forfeiture was an enforcement tool well before Zero Tolerance. Zero Tolerance, however, expanded the use of civil forfeiture to cases involving small quantities of drugs. Previously, only confiscation of contraband was likely to result from the discovery of drugs. Civil forfeiture in general has been a very popular tool among law enforcement personnel. There is added incentive to use the forfeiture penalty because profits from the forfeiture program are channelled back to law enforcement programs.
Less than two months after Zero Tolerance took effect on March 21, 1988, the Customs Service had seized over 700 vehicles, and the Coast Guard had seized twenty-seven boats, including Hogan's Hold Tight. n136 Hogan's case was not the only case involving the seizure of valuable commercial property. On the Canadian border at Blaine, Washington, Customs officers seized a $ 100,000 rig when they discovered a marijuana cigarette in the cab. In Key West, Florida, the Coast Guard seized a seventy-three-foot fishing boat and sold its eight-day haul of fish for $ 5,827, after officials discovered three grams of marijuana seeds and stems on board. The most valuable property seized in the first month of Zero Tolerance's operation was the $ 2.5 million yacht Ark Royal. The Coast Guard found one-tenth of an ounce of marijuana aboard the chartered boat. As if to prove that Zero Tolerance really meant zero tolerance, officials have also seized property in cases where only minuscule quantities of drugs had been discovered. One woman in Washington had her car impounded after Customs inspectors used tweezers to remove one-tenth of a gram of marijuana from the bottom of her purse.
Targets of Zero Tolerance may regain their property eventually. In some cases, officials apparently have recognized the injustice involved and returned property after payment of a fine and seizure fee. In other cases, those whose property has been seized can only hope that the government fails to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the seized property was either purchased with drug profits or used in committing a drug crime. Acquittal in a criminal case does not affect the government's standard of proof in a later forfeiture suit.
The seizure of Kevin Hogan's fishing boat at the height of the Alaska fishing season because a crew member possessed marijuana was a penalty disproportionate to his crime. Even if one recognizes a duty of boat owners to hire drug-free employees, the failure to do so certainly registers a rather low level of blameworthiness. Scant evidence exists to show marijuana to be a significant long-term health risk. n143 Although marijuana causes reduced mental and physical levels of functioning, it is absurd to argue that pot in the pocket of a fisherman represents the public risk that it might, say, in the hands of a United Airlines 747 pilot. A $ 140,000 fine and possible bankruptcy is not an appropriate penalty for inadequate attention to a crew member's drug use. "