Mirelle
N/A
A trust to introduce disadvantaged kids to sailing in a fleet of AWBs?
What a terrifying prospect!
Some years ago I was sitting in Ostende in my much older, non-publicly funded, wooden boat, which incidentally steers very nicely, when a bunch of harrassed looking Englishmen came along the pontoon. I offered them a drink and it turned out that they were some of the instructors off the Shaftesbury Homes' ketch "ARETHUSA", seeking an escape for a few minutes from the truly evil brats that they had to take to sea. They were univerally of the view that the experience was doing their horrid charges no good at all, but was doing dreadful things to the instructors!
We British seem to have been badly affected by Kurt Hahn's ideas about what is good for little monsters. Is there any real, objective, evidence that Outward Bound type dragging of "disadvantaged" brats to sea against their will does any good? Does it really build their little characters? If it does, why does every surveyor I know tell horror stories about the way that the accomodation on such boats has been wrecked by the litttle monsters?
There is quite a track record of attempts to improve the lot of teenage troublemakers by dragging them off to sea. These attempts (Captain Scott, Arethusa, etc) do not seem to have been conspicuously sucessful.
Please can we leave the juvenile deliquents where they belong, rather than dragging them off to sea to have their little characters built?
My son belongs to the Sea Scouts; it is not exepensive and not class ridden. I believe the same can be said of the Sea Cadets. Both these organisations have ample experience with youngsters who DO want to find out about the sea. There is really no shortage of opportunity for "disadvantaged youth" if they want to
do some sailing, but let is stop pretending that it does the little monsters any good, and above all let us stop wasting public money on it.
What a terrifying prospect!
Some years ago I was sitting in Ostende in my much older, non-publicly funded, wooden boat, which incidentally steers very nicely, when a bunch of harrassed looking Englishmen came along the pontoon. I offered them a drink and it turned out that they were some of the instructors off the Shaftesbury Homes' ketch "ARETHUSA", seeking an escape for a few minutes from the truly evil brats that they had to take to sea. They were univerally of the view that the experience was doing their horrid charges no good at all, but was doing dreadful things to the instructors!
We British seem to have been badly affected by Kurt Hahn's ideas about what is good for little monsters. Is there any real, objective, evidence that Outward Bound type dragging of "disadvantaged" brats to sea against their will does any good? Does it really build their little characters? If it does, why does every surveyor I know tell horror stories about the way that the accomodation on such boats has been wrecked by the litttle monsters?
There is quite a track record of attempts to improve the lot of teenage troublemakers by dragging them off to sea. These attempts (Captain Scott, Arethusa, etc) do not seem to have been conspicuously sucessful.
Please can we leave the juvenile deliquents where they belong, rather than dragging them off to sea to have their little characters built?
My son belongs to the Sea Scouts; it is not exepensive and not class ridden. I believe the same can be said of the Sea Cadets. Both these organisations have ample experience with youngsters who DO want to find out about the sea. There is really no shortage of opportunity for "disadvantaged youth" if they want to
do some sailing, but let is stop pretending that it does the little monsters any good, and above all let us stop wasting public money on it.