Ships_Cat
New member
There was a thread along similar but not same lines to this some months ago in which I found the views to be useful.
I have worn contact lenses (short sighted) for about 35 years and as age has caught up I now have the choice between going for good long vision but poorer short or vice versa, or a compromise with neither long nor short perfect. Whichever way, the compromise in vision is not yet sufficient to make bifocal contacts worthwhile.
What I have done in the last few weeks is go for excellent long sight (bottom line no problem and can identify sparrows at 20 miles /forums/images/icons/smile.gif) but at the cost of some minor correction using specs for reading smaller prints or in low light eg charts (only 1.00 dioptre correction at this stage).
Part of my reasoning was this I felt was the best compromise for boating - I wonder what views other bespectacled boaty ones might have on the best trade off.
Thanks for any comments
John
<hr width=100% size=1>I am the cat but I am only 6.
I have worn contact lenses (short sighted) for about 35 years and as age has caught up I now have the choice between going for good long vision but poorer short or vice versa, or a compromise with neither long nor short perfect. Whichever way, the compromise in vision is not yet sufficient to make bifocal contacts worthwhile.
What I have done in the last few weeks is go for excellent long sight (bottom line no problem and can identify sparrows at 20 miles /forums/images/icons/smile.gif) but at the cost of some minor correction using specs for reading smaller prints or in low light eg charts (only 1.00 dioptre correction at this stage).
Part of my reasoning was this I felt was the best compromise for boating - I wonder what views other bespectacled boaty ones might have on the best trade off.
Thanks for any comments
John
<hr width=100% size=1>I am the cat but I am only 6.