davidej
Well-Known Member
My apologies!
The loop is to stop the return line emptying itself into the tank, which in turn can allow air into the injector pump. I found that out first hand when running our engine on the bench before installation, and could even see it because the temporary return line I used was translucent. Incidentally our Beta is a 17HP, and the return connection at the engine end is only 4mm.Just a thought: the installation guidelines make the point that the fuel return/leak off must make a loop below the level of the tank bottom before connection to the tank top. This is to prevent 'fuel drain down', which I understand as fuel siphoning back into the tank.
Could it be that the reason for the 8mm return diameter requirement has to do with this? That the volumes of fuel in supply and return should be in balance?
The loop is to stop the return line emptying itself into the tank, which in turn can allow air into the injector pump. I found that out first hand when running our engine on the bench before installation, and could even see it because the temporary return line I used was translucent. Incidentally our Beta is a 17HP, and the return connection at the engine end is only 4mm.
They did provide someone more senior, the manual.
You're not likely to find a support line for anything where the guy on the phone will tell you to ignore the manual.
If its not something you understand then, yes, go with the manual and pay an engineer to read it to you. If you have some understanding then you should be able to ask support to explain the manual.
Any less is the supplier not living up to their role. This is an expensive engine, not a Lidl toaster.
Twice (approx) as some one else has posted 1/36 plays 1/64
That would be correct if the resistance to flow was inversely proportional to the square of the radius or diameter but doesn't Poiseuille's law state that the resistance is inversely proportional to the radius4 for a constant volume flowrate
RTFM man ......
I spend most days reading sections from auto workshop manuals and then ignore the "expert" instructions around 50% of the time as I can see a better, cheaper, simpler or quicker way.![]()
Do you tell your customers that?
Thats simple, tell him that you have been sold an engine that has not been built to specification and you require them to replace the engine, at their cost, as soon as practicable.I spoke to a guy who just repeated the mantra “8mm thorough out”. I mentioned it having a 6mm outlet from the engine and he said “8mm thorough out” but added “if you don’t use 8mm, I can’t guarantee you won’t get running problems”. This message was delivered in a 'matter of fact/end of discussion' tone. I was not told to 'go away' but it sounded like he did not want to continue the conversation, perhaps he felt I sould simply read the manual and not bother him?
That doesn't really address the technical issue though, as the "Manual" is wrong/inconsistent/inappropriate. I spend most days reading sections from auto workshop manuals and then ignore the "expert" instructions around 50% of the time as I can see a better, cheaper, simpler or quicker way.
Richard
A good few years ago I was at an IT user conference and one of the vendor speakers was someone who was very good and didn't half know it. Someone at the back interrupted one of his talks and said "That's not what the manual says", to which he replied "the manual wasn't written by the expert".
I call Instruction manuals, destruction manuals and I don't repair things manual-ly I repair them automatic-ally.
A good few years ago I was at an IT user conference and one of the vendor speakers was someone who was very good and didn't half know it. Someone at the back interrupted one of his talks and said "That's not what the manual says", to which he replied "the manual wasn't written by the expert".
What sort of man reads the manual anyway Roger ?![]()