Fuel Line advice needed

newBeta

New Member
Joined
19 Apr 2017
Messages
16
Visit site
In the process of fitting a new beta14.

My old fuel tank has 8mm supply and 6mm return pipes.
The beta specifies 8mm supply and return.
The beta has an 8mm inlet connection at the lift pump and a 6mm return connection.
So far – a perfect combination!

A 6” stub of hose with an adapter barb is pre-fitted (by beta) on the return to increase the 6mm return hose size to 8mm.

I was hoping to use 6mm return as it suits my tank but I can use an adapter to allow an 8mm return and feed it into my vent hose fitting on the tank. My tank is only ever filled slowly from fuel cans so I’m not worried about pressure in the return hose blowing fuel back.

I tried to discuss this Beta but feel I was not able to…. More of that later.

Has anyone else done this? My previous engine was a 8mm supply and 6mm return – it’s the arrangement I’m familiar with on other systems to deliberately provide more resistance in the return than the supply (bigger supply / smaller return is the ONLY fuel system I’ve seen boat/car/truck with the exception of those with a pressure regulator before the return).

All advice greatly received.

Now to whinge about Beta support.


I spoke to a guy who just repeated the mantra “8mm thorough out”. I mentioned it having a 6mm outlet from the engine and he said “8mm thorough out” but added “if you don’t use 8mm, I can’t guarantee you won’t get running problems”. This message was delivered in a 'matter of fact/end of discussion' tone. I was not told to 'go away' but it sounded like he did not want to continue the conversation, perhaps he felt I sould simply read the manual and not bother him?

I asked what problem I could potentially expect from using the same size return as the return nozzle on the engine. There was as awkward pause followed by a single word “hunting”.

I asked if he was sure that using a (short) return hose (the same size as the return nozzle) would cause an engine to hunt – the reply? “use 8mm thorough out”.

Whilst not doubting that an 8mm return works, I was trying to ask if it’s strictly necessary. The Beta guy didn’t seem to know it had a 6mm return nozzle on the engine. He didn’t seem to understand the domain. I suspect the short length of 6mm pipe provides the necessary restriction and the reason for specifying 8mm throughout is just to simplify installation.

Sadly, beta support was not in a position to explain the reason for the 6mm/8mm adapter in the return line.

Has anyone else had a support/info issue with beta, anyone tried asking Kubota?

All in all I feel this is very poor service for the money spent. I’d recommend paying a little more to buy an engine from a supplier with support engineers who can confidently explain the reasons for their specifications. This confidence can then be shared with the customer.

I do appreciate that I may have just caught him on a bad day – the sandwich van may have been outside blowing its horn or perhaps his facebook account required urgent attention. He missed the opportunity to escalate the enquiry to someone who understood the question. I don’t think this was a malicious act – he just wasn’t knowledgeable enough to appreciate that he did not understand the question. The result was the same though, if I ever buy again, it will be from a better supported outfit.

On a positive note, the documentation produced by Beta is very good. If we could have access to the guys who wrote that then beta would be a truly winning formula.
 
I don't think you will have any problem with a 6mm return line if there is already a 6mm constriction in the line anyway.

Any effect on flow rates would be very marginal and I suspect only have any possible impact if running continuously at wide open throttle but even then I suspect it would be zero impact and this would be even less than zero if you ran an 8mm line to the tank with a final adaptor back down to 6mm at the tank.

Richard
 
Just for ease, lets say that 6mm hose causes twice the back pressure of 8mm (its mighty close anyway)
So, since the back pressure is proportional to length (as well as inverse of X section area amongst other things) then a 2m of 8mm hose will have the same back pressure as 1m of 6mm

Where I'm going with this is that the short (very short by comparison) length of connection at engine and tank will have very little effect on the overall line run.
 
Hmm, I have a Beta 25 and have always had excellent service from them. I did my own installation and to be honest I can't remember what size the return pipe is. The new plastic tank I fitted had a fitting already in the top for the return and from memory I just fitted the return hose to the fitting. I suspect your 6mm fitting will have no affect on the running - it is only 14hp after all so no huge flow of fuel.
 
Just for ease, lets say that 6mm hose causes twice the back pressure of 8mm (its mighty close anyway)
So, since the back pressure is proportional to length (as well as inverse of X section area amongst other things) then a 2m of 8mm hose will have the same back pressure as 1m of 6mm

Where I'm going with this is that the short (very short by comparison) length of connection at engine and tank will have very little effect on the overall line run.

Fluid dynamics is definitely not my subject but ITYWF that resistance is flow is inversely proportional to diameter4

This means that 6mm hose will have over three times the resistance of an equal length of 8mm
i see no great problem though in having a very short reduction to 6mm at the tank end of the return hose, at leastst no more so than the short initial 6mm connection.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Richard,
I was going to run 8mm and just reduce it to 6mm at the tank.
Appreciate the extra drag in the smaller bore hose (thinking amps in cables) and the effect of length.
It's great to have some first hand advice, gives me the confidence to proceed. Thanks.

Thanks Dougal,
I'll keep the 6mm sections very short. Again – first hand advice that gives me confidence. Thanks.

PF
Sounds good – little more effect than the short 6mm length pre-fitted by Beta. If (like you) I had a new plastic tank, this would not be a question. But I have a welded stainless tank in excellent condition and it has a welded 6mm return fitting..

As you say, its only a little engine. Also is unlikely to ever run over 80% as it is replacing a lower power unit.

Good to hear you had excellent service from Beta. Pre-purchase, I did too. Mr G was excellent. He really understands and is a pleasure to talk to. Sadly, when I called the last two times, I could only get the most junior (1st line?) support. His main interest seemed to be getting me off the phone. It would have been better if they had sent me an email address for an engineer. Speaking to someone who isn't upto the question is really frustrating. Hope I didn't rant too much.

Beta was the best value – can't have it all ways

VicS
I think you're right. Isn't it the same thing as power needed to push the boat through the water? Doubling speed requires power4?

As the 6mm bit I'm adding will only be a couple of inches, it shouldn't make much difference. I could shorten the supplied 6mm length of return pre-fitted to the engine (if I wanted to be really sure).
Thanks for the thoughts.

So Thanks Guys – great help, great responses to my fist post.
Here's hoping I didn't whinge too much about the Beta guy – not his fault, he should not have been put in the position he was today. Beta should have provided him with someone to pass the call to.

NewB
 
On my Beta 20HP I have 8mm flow with 6mm return. Each run is around 2.5m. Never had a problem since installed 15 years ago. Always found Beta very helpful. Their installation manual (downloadable) is very good but perhaps a bit dogmatic and seeks perfection perhaps not always possible in the real world. Nothing wrong with that but it would be helpful if you could gain advice from somebody who was not simply following the party line! When I installed mine all those years ago there were no installation instructions at all, it was simply a case of common sense and some mechanical knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Fluid dynamics is definitely not my subject but ITYWF that resistance is flow is inversely proportional to diameter4.

Aha, you are right, I forgot that reduced diameter causes increased flow rate... I would have been right is flow rate remained the same (which it cant really) doh!
 
.... there were no installation instructions at all....

No manual would have been fine, I'd have seen the 6mm hose on the engine and just used a 6mm run without over thinking it.
Add a written requirement for 8mm and a 1st liner who can only recite the manual.... now I have a problem.


Good to know your 20hp runs on 6mm. I'll go with the common sense and ignore the junior beta guy.
 
No manual would have been fine, I'd have seen the 6mm hose on the engine and just used a 6mm run without over thinking it.
Add a written requirement for 8mm and a 1st liner who can only recite the manual.... now I have a problem.


Good to know your 20hp runs on 6mm. I'll go with the common sense and ignore the junior beta guy.

I am not sure that you can call ignoring the engine manufacturer's advice common sense but as already mentioned the length of the hose is also relevant somewhere presumably Beta must state the maximum acceptable length for 8mm hose . Provided you keep a 6mm hose run to 1/3 of that you will have no problems
 
Here's hoping I didn't whinge too much about the Beta guy – not his fault, he should not have been put in the position he was today. Beta should have provided him with someone to pass the call to.

NewB

They did provide someone more senior, the manual.

You're not likely to find a support line for anything where the guy on the phone will tell you to ignore the manual.
 
One thing thats bugging me here..
The engine Beta14: 13.5 bhp @ 3,600 rpm 479cc.

Surely even a 6mm hose is like 2" drain pipe fuel lines on a domestic car.
What am I missing (this time)?
Does it have an over enthusiastic lift pump?
 
Just a thought: the installation guidelines make the point that the fuel return/leak off must make a loop below the level of the tank bottom before connection to the tank top. This is to prevent 'fuel drain down', which I understand as fuel siphoning back into the tank.
Could it be that the reason for the 8mm return diameter requirement has to do with this? That the volumes of fuel in supply and return should be in balance?
 
In the process of fitting a new beta14.

My old fuel tank has 8mm supply and 6mm return pipes.
The beta specifies 8mm supply and return.
The beta has an 8mm inlet connection at the lift pump and a 6mm return connection.
So far – a perfect combination!

A 6” stub of hose with an adapter barb is pre-fitted (by beta) on the return to increase the 6mm return hose size to 8mm.

I was hoping to use 6mm return as it suits my tank but I can use an adapter to allow an 8mm return and feed it into my vent hose fitting on the tank. My tank is only ever filled slowly from fuel cans so I’m not worried about pressure in the return hose blowing fuel back.

I tried to discuss this Beta but feel I was not able to…. More of that later.

Has anyone else done this? My previous engine was a 8mm supply and 6mm return – it’s the arrangement I’m familiar with on other systems to deliberately provide more resistance in the return than the supply (bigger supply / smaller return is the ONLY fuel system I’ve seen boat/car/truck with the exception of those with a pressure regulator before the return).

All advice greatly received.

Now to whinge about Beta support.


I spoke to a guy who just repeated the mantra “8mm thorough out”. I mentioned it having a 6mm outlet from the engine and he said “8mm thorough out” but added “if you don’t use 8mm, I can’t guarantee you won’t get running problems”. This message was delivered in a 'matter of fact/end of discussion' tone. I was not told to 'go away' but it sounded like he did not want to continue the conversation, perhaps he felt I sould simply read the manual and not bother him?

I asked what problem I could potentially expect from using the same size return as the return nozzle on the engine. There was as awkward pause followed by a single word “hunting”.

I asked if he was sure that using a (short) return hose (the same size as the return nozzle) would cause an engine to hunt – the reply? “use 8mm thorough out”.

Whilst not doubting that an 8mm return works, I was trying to ask if it’s strictly necessary. The Beta guy didn’t seem to know it had a 6mm return nozzle on the engine. He didn’t seem to understand the domain. I suspect the short length of 6mm pipe provides the necessary restriction and the reason for specifying 8mm throughout is just to simplify installation.

Sadly, beta support was not in a position to explain the reason for the 6mm/8mm adapter in the return line.

Has anyone else had a support/info issue with beta, anyone tried asking Kubota?

All in all I feel this is very poor service for the money spent. I’d recommend paying a little more to buy an engine from a supplier with support engineers who can confidently explain the reasons for their specifications. This confidence can then be shared with the customer.

I do appreciate that I may have just caught him on a bad day – the sandwich van may have been outside blowing its horn or perhaps his facebook account required urgent attention. He missed the opportunity to escalate the enquiry to someone who understood the question. I don’t think this was a malicious act – he just wasn’t knowledgeable enough to appreciate that he did not understand the question. The result was the same though, if I ever buy again, it will be from a better supported outfit.

On a positive note, the documentation produced by Beta is very good. If we could have access to the guys who wrote that then beta would be a truly winning formula.
What would you do if he said "It will probably work fine" and you got a problem with the engine after installation?
 
What would you do if he said "It will probably work fine" and you got a problem with the engine after installation?

Wow – that’s a long quote… Frightened I was going to delete it?

If he had said ‘It will probably work fine’ I would have asked him for his reasoning.
 
Sometimes with first level support teams you just have to wait a while and try again in the hope of getting someone else.

Worked for me with an electronics supplier last year. First technician wasn't a numptie, but after a while he'd clearly run out of ideas and lost interest, so the exchange fizzled out. Second one made a few suggestions for investigation in the first call which allowed me to identify the problem within half an hour.
 
Sometimes with first level support teams you just have to wait a while and try again....

You're right of course. I suppose the reason I didn't do that (or ask to speak to second line) was fear of being told I already had an aswer.
Given that the answer wasn't really an answer - I would have felt really silly having spent all that money if second line also just read the manual at me and refused to explain.
 
You're right of course. I suppose the reason I didn't do that (or ask to speak to second line) was fear of being told I already had an aswer.
Given that the answer wasn't really an answer - I would have felt really silly having spent all that money if second line also just read the manual at me and refused to explain.

If I had been in the OPs position I would have felt a bit frustrated by Beta help simply being "no it can't be done (in 6mm).
I would hope that a more experienced/knowledgeable/practicable person would have pointed out the possible pitfalls and problems that might arise and, once having given you the information, leave it up to you to make an INFORMED decision. To be fair to Beta they do not know the level of expertise potential DIY owners have so have to make their advice fairly rigid, but I would hope that once speaking to customers they could then offer reasons for their instructions and possible "work rounds" for installations that cannot always meet the sometimes impractical criteria. The OP possibly had a bad experience since I have found Beta helpful with any questions I have had.
 
Fluid dynamics is definitely not my subject but ITYWF that resistance is flow is inversely proportional to diameter4

This means that 6mm hose will have over three times the resistance of an equal length of 8mm

i see no great problem though in having a very short reduction to 6mm at the tank end of the return hose, at leastst no more so than the short initial 6mm connection.


Twice (approx) as some one else has posted 1/36 plays 1/64
 
Twice (approx) as some one else has posted 1/36 plays 1/64

That would be correct if the resistance to flow was inversely proportional to the square of the radius or diameter but doesn't Poiseuille's law state that the resistance is inversely proportional to the radius4 for a constant volume flowrate
 
Last edited:
Top