Sybarite
Well-known member
In another thread it was implied that the success of the French boating industry is due to subsidies.
Not true. Someday will somebody please explain what these subsidies are supposed to consist of? I can think of tax incentives with respect to the tourist development of the French overseas territories and departments of which boating was only one of the industries to benefit from them. But then the UK also has regional development policies and, in addition had, until about 10 years ago zero-rated offshore companies (which the French didn't) used by many of the larger boats
Rather the French builders cater for what sailors really want and not what they think sailors should have. I used to laugh at the continual criticisms in English yachting magazines that such and such a boat didn't have lee cloths or that another had too many berths...
The development in France was driven by the charter market where most people are day sailors - groups of students or company works committees who want to get into the local bistro in the evening. They don't give a fiddlers about long term creature comforts. Even crossing to SW England or Corsica is only an overnight hop and normally no great shakes. It would be interesting to do a survey of how many overnight passages you would do in an average season or in a boat's lifetime.
This approach - following the sudden popularity of sailing after Eric Tabarly's well-publicized transat win in 1968 - enabled the French builders to have bigger production runs enabling them to bring unit costs down which in turn enabled them to sell even more enabling them to build more modern plants etc etc. Building efficiently on volumes in the '000's does not necessarily mean poor quality. You don't continually increase your market share with bad quality. Enough BenJeans have crossed oceans now to have proved the concept. My criticism of them is not one of quality but rather of the banality of boat designs today.
They have also benefitted or more correctly the British have been handicapped by a pound that suddenly became 20% more expensive for buyers than euro-denominated French or German boats. It's no accident that while the UK car industry is going from crisis to crisis the French are adding additional work shifts: nights and week-ends, and the shipyards have full order books for many years to come. They can also plan with currency stability over a 300 million population market rather than a 60 miilion UK market. You may have guessed that I'm an advocate of Britain adopting the euro! ( The banks and the City are against it BECAUSE they make more money from arbitraging currencies at the expense of the likes of you and me who know less about it than them ! )
Sure I would like a British or a Scandinavian boat if I had the means. Would I be willing to pay 25% - 50% - 100% more than a boat that is almost as good ? - not so sure.
Joyeux Noël - I'm off.
Not true. Someday will somebody please explain what these subsidies are supposed to consist of? I can think of tax incentives with respect to the tourist development of the French overseas territories and departments of which boating was only one of the industries to benefit from them. But then the UK also has regional development policies and, in addition had, until about 10 years ago zero-rated offshore companies (which the French didn't) used by many of the larger boats
Rather the French builders cater for what sailors really want and not what they think sailors should have. I used to laugh at the continual criticisms in English yachting magazines that such and such a boat didn't have lee cloths or that another had too many berths...
The development in France was driven by the charter market where most people are day sailors - groups of students or company works committees who want to get into the local bistro in the evening. They don't give a fiddlers about long term creature comforts. Even crossing to SW England or Corsica is only an overnight hop and normally no great shakes. It would be interesting to do a survey of how many overnight passages you would do in an average season or in a boat's lifetime.
This approach - following the sudden popularity of sailing after Eric Tabarly's well-publicized transat win in 1968 - enabled the French builders to have bigger production runs enabling them to bring unit costs down which in turn enabled them to sell even more enabling them to build more modern plants etc etc. Building efficiently on volumes in the '000's does not necessarily mean poor quality. You don't continually increase your market share with bad quality. Enough BenJeans have crossed oceans now to have proved the concept. My criticism of them is not one of quality but rather of the banality of boat designs today.
They have also benefitted or more correctly the British have been handicapped by a pound that suddenly became 20% more expensive for buyers than euro-denominated French or German boats. It's no accident that while the UK car industry is going from crisis to crisis the French are adding additional work shifts: nights and week-ends, and the shipyards have full order books for many years to come. They can also plan with currency stability over a 300 million population market rather than a 60 miilion UK market. You may have guessed that I'm an advocate of Britain adopting the euro! ( The banks and the City are against it BECAUSE they make more money from arbitraging currencies at the expense of the likes of you and me who know less about it than them ! )
Sure I would like a British or a Scandinavian boat if I had the means. Would I be willing to pay 25% - 50% - 100% more than a boat that is almost as good ? - not so sure.
Joyeux Noël - I'm off.