Free wifi

There is a principle rising here.
First this is not a dig at Vic. In a way I can understand him being upset at the suggestion of theft. But the underlying theme of - this is how it is done - is still there.
Of course he only pointed to the App & one has to make one's own opinion from there on in.
So fair dues to Vic , he has pointed it out in good faith , because the " knife" can be used in a good way.
However, going on tho your reply to my " why should the landlord change his password"
One is suggesting that it is the landlord's fault that the internet is slow.He should do something about it.
It reminds me of the sad case recently of the young girl who has just committed suicide.
The press has lambasted the software provider ( was it facebook or someone? i do not use it)
No one has said anything about the idiots who post the stuff in the first place. No one has said " what will we do to those people. All they can do is scream at Facebook.

A bit like the landlord- no one has said anything about the yuppies who you suggest might post obscene muck. No one has said anything about the bloke who might use Vic's App ( for want of a better description) & use up the bandwidth.
Same thing really, is it not?

And please Vic- Do not get the hump - it is a thread drift that I admit should be in the lounge

I think you're reading too much into my reply. I was just pointing out why the landlord that you spoke to should care about his wifi service. He's paying for it, but by not bothering to maintain it he's cheesed you off, he's doing the same to others and wasting an asset that should be earning him customers - the very reason he pays for it.

And I suppose that's why I haven't expressed a view on the original subject. I've no doubt that there will be a few wifi providers who would be outraged to find a non-paying user on their network, but the majority will be aware that it happens, don't really like it, but as with your landlord, just can't be bothered to do anything about it. I dare say some may hope that by being listed on the app brings them customers, and I'm sure it probably does. The thing is, no matter how much or how little the business owner knows about wifi, the access point installed in his premises came with the password enabled, and if he's changed or disabled it then he takes responsibility for how it's used or abused.

If he has any sense it will be an uncapped connection, so the freeloader costs nothing except possibly causing slow down and so I can't really see how it's causing so much angst. If this conversation was taking place five or ten years ago then I could have understood it, but who now actually bothers with public wifi unless they're in a 4G dead zone? (Yes, I know that my 'phone might try and connect to an unsecured one, and then do the stuff that I've told it not to do over 4G - updates etc.. but if it does, then because its owners haven't secured their network, then tough).

Actually, that does raise a point. How do the outraged feel about the fact that their 'phones might automatically be connecting to unsecured networks? And taking that opportunity to download updates and upload their photographs - much higher data use than some yuppie checking his emails? Who's freeloading now? Or have you disabled auto scanning?
 
This thread has gone from the ridiculous to insane. Would there be any possibility of setting up a sub-forum for those of us who are actually interested in sharing and benefiting from genuine tips and advice from other like minded boaters.
 
True, of course, but at least you're pretty certain that everyone on the network has made themselves identifiable to the network owners. Not by any means fool-proof! But it's the best you're going to get in most public places; distributing WPA keys is insecure as well as being more of a burden for hotel or bar staff. And places that have a WPA password on a notice by the bar (or wherever) might as well not bother.

I thought the whole point of public/private key cryptography was that you could safely distribute the public key willy-nilly. What am I missing?

Incidentally, my home wifi has no security at all because, thanks to 200 year old thick stone walls, it only works in my living room.
 
I thought the whole point of public/private key cryptography was that you could safely distribute the public key willy-nilly. What am I missing?

Incidentally, my home wifi has no security at all because, thanks to 200 year old thick stone walls, it only works in my living room.

Anyone with the WPA password can access the network freely:

From Wikipedia:
"WPA and WPA2 don't provide forward secrecy, meaning that once an adverse person discovers the pre-shared key, they can potentially decrypt all packets encrypted using that PSK transmitted in the future and even past, which could be passively and silently collected by the attacker. This also means an attacker can silently capture and decrypt others' packets if a WPA-protected access point is provided free of charge at a public place, because its password is usually shared to anyone in that place. In other words, WPA only protects from attackers who don't have access to the password. Because of that, it's safer to use Transport Layer Security (TLS) or similar on top of that for the transfer of any sensitive data. However starting from WPA3, this issue has been addressed"

In other words, if you have the WPA password, you can decrypt any packet on the network. WPA3 apparently addresses that, but I don't hink it's implemented on many routers yet.
I think that restricting the signal (as far as possible) to the premises is the other main means used for security; you're up with the best of them :)
 
Last edited:
Because an app is hosted at Google play Store or the App Store in no way implies anything about the app except that it has passed some anti-virus/ anti malware checking. You will find as much in the terms and conditions of those sites.
If an establishment intended to have completely open WiFi then they would not password protect it.
They do expect it to be used by patrons only.
The fact that the password is in the public domain in no way confers the right to distribute it. The terms and conditions for tha app, in fact, remove liability to the authors for just that case.
It is entirely possible to use this app to infringe the rights of the establishments that provide free WiFi for customers, in fact there is little use to disseminating passwords except to defraud those establishments.

A map of hotspots with user ratings is obviously very handy, disseminating the passwords for those places is of no use except to defraud the hosts.


So, you want advice?
Dont trust apps.
 
Because an app is hosted at Google play Store or the App Store in no way implies anything about the app except that it has passed some anti-virus/ anti malware checking. You will find as much in the terms and conditions of those sites.
If an establishment intended to have completely open WiFi then they would not password protect it.
They do expect it to be used by patrons only.
The fact that the password is in the public domain in no way confers the right to distribute it. The terms and conditions for tha app, in fact, remove liability to the authors for just that case.
It is entirely possible to use this app to infringe the rights of the establishments that provide free WiFi for customers, in fact there is little use to disseminating passwords except to defraud those establishments.

A map of hotspots with user ratings is obviously very handy, disseminating the passwords for those places is of no use except to defraud the hosts.


So, you want advice?
Dont trust apps.

It's an app. It's on Google Play and Apple Store. The end. (and I've now installed it!) :encouragement:

Richard
 
Was in the process of downloading this App and it wanted permission to access various things on my phone, okay location was fair enough, it would need that. But it also wanted for me to give permission for it to access my camera and media files for example. I decided not to continue, am I being paranoid?
 
There is a principle rising here.
First this is not a dig at Vic. In a way I can understand him being upset at the suggestion of theft. But the underlying theme of - this is how it is done - is still there.
Of course he only pointed to the App & one has to make one's own opinion from there on in.
So fair dues to Vic , he has pointed it out in good faith , because the " knife" can be used in a good way.
However, going on tho your reply to my " why should the landlord change his password"
One is suggesting that it is the landlord's fault that the internet is slow.He should do something about it.
It reminds me of the sad case recently of the young girl who has just committed suicide.
The press has lambasted the software provider ( was it facebook or someone? i do not use it)
No one has said anything about the idiots who post the stuff in the first place. No one has said " what will we do to those people. All they can do is scream at Facebook.

A bit like the landlord- no one has said anything about the yuppies who you suggest might post obscene muck. No one has said anything about the bloke who might use Vic's App ( for want of a better description) & use up the bandwidth.
Same thing really, is it not?

And please Vic- Do not get the hump - it is a thread drift that I admit should be in the lounge

@ daydreamer I haven't got the hump with you it's fine really ,
I just furious with the two who think it's ok to go around and suggest that I may steal from people or encourage others to do So ,
So much that I was going to call Steph the editor up and complain about both of them .

Has for your landlord it's clear to me and I sure others who are more IT knowledgable will confirm if your inside and can't get a good signal it's nothing to do with anyone sitting out side who may or may not be buying a drink ,
we always try and get as close to the box because I know the further you are way from the router and more people that useing the Internet between you and the router the slower data your going to recived
 
Last edited:
Was in the process of downloading this App and it wanted permission to access various things on my phone, okay location was fair enough, it would need that. But it also wanted for me to give permission for it to access my camera and media files for example. I decided not to continue, am I being paranoid?

Hi
I been useing it over the summer and when I uploaded it , it never asked me for access to my camera , it may have changed but I know I was uploading the new Navionica app the other day and it asked me the same ,
I just refused .
So maybe this happen what ever app your downloading .
By the way hope all ok and with some luck we see C and you at some point over the summer .
 
Last edited:
Is it just a European thing having password protected wifi? Last time I was in the USA I was surprised how many establishments had open wifi.

In Portugal the number of establishments (like public transport) providing free wifi are increasing rapidly but to keep some control and discourage heavy surfing/poaching, the footprint is often fairly restricted and the site is slow (adequate to get emails but not so good for pulling down games and real time video).
 
Last edited:
Hi Vic, Please don't take it so personal.:encouragement:

You, I and a number of contributors provide information (hopefully useful) with a good heart so our consciences are clear.:angel:

Don't lose heart and quit (like another very helpful contributor).:(

I know how you feel and must admit, when trolled I feel like Mr T and say, "Stuff the lot of you!":mad:

And to you detractors, I say if you drive the likes of Vic away YOU WILL BE THE LOSERS.:disgust:
 
Last edited:
I don't appear to be suggesting anything. What I am categorically and unequivocally stating is that it's an app. It's on Google Play and Apple Store. The end. :rolleyes:

Richard

I don't think that anyone has denied that what the OP was referring to is an app and is available on Google Play and Apple Store, so if that was the totality of your post it would have been unexceptional, if pointless. However, your post went on to say "The end. :rolleyes:". I took this to mean that you believed the proposition in the previous sentence self-evidently closed the arguement, either by settling it conclusively one way or the other or demonstrating that it was either trivial or unresolvable. If in fact "The end. :rolleyes:" was merely a decoration, or an end-marker similar to the more usual full stop or the pro-word "out" in a radiotelephone message, I apologise for trying to extract more meaning from your post than it actually contained.
 
I don't think that anyone has denied that what the OP was referring to is an app and is available on Google Play and Apple Store, so if that was the totality of your post it would have been unexceptional, if pointless. However, your post went on to say "The end. :rolleyes:". I took this to mean that you believed the proposition in the previous sentence self-evidently closed the argument, either by settling it conclusively one way or the other or demonstrating that it was either trivial or unresolable. If in fact "The end. :rolleyes:" was merely a decoration, or an end-marker similar to the more usual full stop or the pro-word "out" in a radiotelephone message, I apologize for trying to extract more meaning from your post than it actually contained.

Beam me up Scotty!;)
 
I don't think that anyone has denied that what the OP was referring to is an app and is available on Google Play and Apple Store, so if that was the totality of your post it would have been unexceptional, if pointless. However, your post went on to say "The end. :rolleyes:". I took this to mean that you believed the proposition in the previous sentence self-evidently closed the arguement, either by settling it conclusively one way or the other or demonstrating that it was either trivial or unresolvable. If in fact "The end. :rolleyes:" was merely a decoration, or an end-marker similar to the more usual full stop or the pro-word "out" in a radiotelephone message, I apologise for trying to extract more meaning from your post than it actually contained.

What's that funny smell? :rolleyes:

Richard
 
Perhaps, just perhaps, more establishments should embrace people using their WiFi. On the whole, I doubt it slows the WiFi down significantly, unless it is a very busy establishment. I think there is a chance, a good chance that those who are using the WiFi, especially us sailors, will also go and use their facilites. I can imagine being moored up near a Greek taverna, using their WiFi, and, of course where would I go for a drink or breakfast, of course that taverna. Its like putting a bowl of water out for passing dogs, its a gratuity and if you get some customers for your kindness good on you. I actually take greater humbrage at those people who sit for hours in a cafe, with one coffee, take up a table, and believe you me, with many clients in the business that is their biggest gripe.
 
Hi
I been useing it over the summer and when I uploaded it , it never asked me for access to my camera , it may have changed but I know I was uploading the new Navionica app the other day and it asked me the same ,
I just refused .
So maybe this happen what ever app your downloading .
By the way hope all ok and with some luck we see C and you at some point over the summer .

Look forward
 
Top