anoccasionalyachtsman
Well-Known Member
There is a principle rising here.
First this is not a dig at Vic. In a way I can understand him being upset at the suggestion of theft. But the underlying theme of - this is how it is done - is still there.
Of course he only pointed to the App & one has to make one's own opinion from there on in.
So fair dues to Vic , he has pointed it out in good faith , because the " knife" can be used in a good way.
However, going on tho your reply to my " why should the landlord change his password"
One is suggesting that it is the landlord's fault that the internet is slow.He should do something about it.
It reminds me of the sad case recently of the young girl who has just committed suicide.
The press has lambasted the software provider ( was it facebook or someone? i do not use it)
No one has said anything about the idiots who post the stuff in the first place. No one has said " what will we do to those people. All they can do is scream at Facebook.
A bit like the landlord- no one has said anything about the yuppies who you suggest might post obscene muck. No one has said anything about the bloke who might use Vic's App ( for want of a better description) & use up the bandwidth.
Same thing really, is it not?
And please Vic- Do not get the hump - it is a thread drift that I admit should be in the lounge
I think you're reading too much into my reply. I was just pointing out why the landlord that you spoke to should care about his wifi service. He's paying for it, but by not bothering to maintain it he's cheesed you off, he's doing the same to others and wasting an asset that should be earning him customers - the very reason he pays for it.
And I suppose that's why I haven't expressed a view on the original subject. I've no doubt that there will be a few wifi providers who would be outraged to find a non-paying user on their network, but the majority will be aware that it happens, don't really like it, but as with your landlord, just can't be bothered to do anything about it. I dare say some may hope that by being listed on the app brings them customers, and I'm sure it probably does. The thing is, no matter how much or how little the business owner knows about wifi, the access point installed in his premises came with the password enabled, and if he's changed or disabled it then he takes responsibility for how it's used or abused.
If he has any sense it will be an uncapped connection, so the freeloader costs nothing except possibly causing slow down and so I can't really see how it's causing so much angst. If this conversation was taking place five or ten years ago then I could have understood it, but who now actually bothers with public wifi unless they're in a 4G dead zone? (Yes, I know that my 'phone might try and connect to an unsecured one, and then do the stuff that I've told it not to do over 4G - updates etc.. but if it does, then because its owners haven't secured their network, then tough).
Actually, that does raise a point. How do the outraged feel about the fact that their 'phones might automatically be connecting to unsecured networks? And taking that opportunity to download updates and upload their photographs - much higher data use than some yuppie checking his emails? Who's freeloading now? Or have you disabled auto scanning?