For solo sailors - worried spouse?

What sort of waters are you sailing in?
That is the crucial question. Others have given plenty of alternatives if you have a phone signal and AIS has also been mentioned. The most expensive way but probably most reliable is one of the many trackers as Iliad suggests
Carry a Garmin InReach, SPOT, Yellowbrick, or Motorola satellite tracker. Not free but very robust relay systems in place, more so than AIS, and they allow limited two way comms. Especially good if your cruising grounds are somewhere less gifted with mobile phone infrastructure.
Most of the time I just keep in touch via mobile phone either voice, video or text but do have a Yellow Brick which gave my best friend and family some reassurance when crossing the Pacific on my own.
 
As I get older (recently retired) my wife is getting more and more concerned about "Suppose something goes wrong. How will I know?"
I normally sail alone. My response is usually short with "You'll find out eventually one way or another." But she is deserving of a better, more informed reply.
So what do people do? Do you have any plans in place? Lack of contact etc? Something that perhaps I should be doing and keep her a little less worried.
Thoughts? Ideas?
I think there are two approaches to this subject:

One: is explained and dealt with above. All these solutions are not dealing with the actual problem but just like baby phones (you plug them into the electricity wall plug and can listen to the baby's noises in other rooms of the house) give you an illusion of security while it only enslaves you to ever changing and updated technologies which are of doubtful use and reliability.
If your wife knows in real time that you have stepped UP into your liferaft she will have a rather tense time without being able to contribute anything meaningful to your salvation.
I am not advocating that you go out without any emergency communication means; just communicate with people who can really help you and not with emotionally involved but factually impotent onlookers.

Two: is becoming aware that life is interesting, sometimes dangerous but most of the times nothing happens. This might necessitate a bit of reflection on what life is about, where have we come to, .... what is the real value of solitude, aso.
Do you want to be under permanent surveillance, does your wife want to know exactly where you are at any given time or are these simply more exercises to keep your mind occupied with ultimately useless routines?

I remember when one left and was wished a safe journey. Everybody assumed all will be o.k. When you had arrived safely, you let your loved ones know; by telegram some sixty years ago, by phone or whats app today. If you had a flat tyre, you tell the story afterwards. If you had an accident - you might have died or be cared for by the ambulance; but definitely not by your wife back home.

Essence is: if you can see some value in this, try to convince your wife, that since nothing bad happened so far it will probably not happen in the future and she should not worry about something that has not happened yet. And have a good time.

If you are into "technology" rather than "philosophy" just disregard my thoughts.
 
Last edited:
The RYA SafeTrx stores the track points on your device and will upload them even if your phone briefly connected during a passage whilst you weren't looking at it.
Any of the other tracking apps/services will do the same. Some like google maps location sharing may have other advantages like showing the state of the battery on your phone. Others like Apple 'Find my' may still be locatable when the phone powers down to save the last few percent of battery.

I do like what SafeTrx is trying to do. Some of it is a big clunky.
I find this an advantage and the alerting function is far from a false alarm, it's exactly what I'd like to happen if I was well overdue at my destination.
It is if you have sailed to a remote anchorage with no phone signal and so cannot hit the button to confirm your arrival (or reach by voice etc). Then (i) you have to radio CG to say - expect a concerned call, but im just out of range; (ii) next time you find yourself late and unobtainable is it real or just the technology weakness - there will be a finite number of times a worried wife is going to sheepishly call the CG to see if you are just of out of range!

As well as having to make that call to the CG - I've had it show a signal (G) but too poor to let the safely arrived button work properly, and no signal on the device I used but enough to send text from someone else's phone on board.

He's probably just out of range, phone on silent etc are the easy explanations we tell ourselves whilst delaying calling 999.
I send my land based watchkeeper the SafeTrx link for the voyage and also both Vesselfinder and Marinetraffic links to our boat so they can double check before getting concerned.
Doesn't actually tell them you are safe though. SafeTrx says wonky is overdue... vesselfinder shows he's where he was expecting to be though and the safetrx showed him headed there so must be ok... whilst you actually fell overboard trying to set the anchor!
They are fully aware of limitations of being out of range of mobile signals and I like it as a back up with positive alerts (ie the overdue message) rather than lack of WhatsApp message etc.
I think it is useful - how useful on a long passage is something I'm not so sure about. Their concept is you put your plan in at the start of the day and off you go until you reach your destination when you log yourself safe. Knowing I'm over due at 7pm is better than not knowing until I don't return the following day, but knowing something has gone wrong at 10am and the boat's been sailing on autopilot since then might be more helpful! If you were actually using it as "proof of life" it would be nice if it prompted you periodically to check all OK, no change to plans etc, or actually if it was intergrated to boat network, or activity trackers on phone and realised when inactivity might suggest an issue. Once you've had a few "no signal" moments like above - you start adding an hour on to the plan to allow for attempts to get a signal by going ashore, going up a hill etc... That means if I do fall in before my actual ETA I have to wait an extra hour for help so its probably a false comfort blanket.

If you sail places where 99.9% of the time you have a data connection then it works great. But it still suffers from a very real risk that you report safe then step off the boat into a dinghy which is probably the highest risk bit of the trip!
 
Do you want to be under permanent surveillance,
if I was concerned about being constantly spyed on, it wouldn't be by my wife. It seems an increasing number of yachts are adding AIS transmitters which means not only every ship nearby can see them but a number of commercial services publish that data to the web.
does your wife want to know exactly where you are at any given time or are these simply more exercises to keep your mind occupied with ultimately useless routines?
Interestingly we turned on location sharing for some specific reason ages ago. It actually has proven to be far more useful than your philosophy suggests - rather than being used for some nepharious or over eager purpose or demanding that we must check in with each other (by telegram or otherwise) it means when the other party is wondering where you are but doesn't want to pester you they can quickly check. This can help plan food, find you in a busy area or provide reassurance that you've time for another pint before anyone complains you weren't home to make the dinner!
I remember when one left and was wished a safe journey. Everybody assumed all will be o.k. When you had arrived safely, you let your loved ones know; by telegram some sixty years ago, by phone or whats app today. If you had a flat tyre, you tell the story afterwards. If you had an accident - you might have died or be cared for by the ambulance; but definitely not by your wife back home.
But many an adventurer has been found because a wife realised they were overdue and triggered a search.
Essence is: if you can see some value in this, try to convince your wife, that since nothing bad happened so far it will probably not happen in the future
His wife is probably smart enough to know that its unlikely he's immortal so there's a flaw in your logic!
and she should not worry about something that has not happened yet. And have a good time.
Perhaps the way for her not to worry is to have some form of reassuring update, or access to such information.
 
if I was concerned about being constantly spyed on, it wouldn't be by my wife. It seems an increasing number of yachts are adding AIS transmitters which means not only every ship nearby can see them but a number of commercial services publish that data to the web.

Interestingly we turned on location sharing for some specific reason ages ago. It actually has proven to be far more useful than your philosophy suggests - rather than being used for some nepharious or over eager purpose or demanding that we must check in with each other (by telegram or otherwise) it means when the other party is wondering where you are but doesn't want to pester you they can quickly check. This can help plan food, find you in a busy area or provide reassurance that you've time for another pint before anyone complains you weren't home to make the dinner!

But many an adventurer has been found because a wife realised they were overdue and triggered a search.

His wife is probably smart enough to know that its unlikely he's immortal so there's a flaw in your logic!

Perhaps the way for her not to worry is to have some form of reassuring update, or access to such information.
I appreciate the time you spent to take isolated sentences of my post and contradict them. Of course there is always one scenario where - whatever it is - would have been useful, had we only had it with us...
I also never even hinted that the OP's wife is not smart enough to to grasp the concept of mortality.

Apart from putting a few meanings into my words which never where intended by me, I get the impression that you are defending "technology" in general, while I tried to touch on something like "how to achieve piece of mind without electronic gadgets". Or: less can be more.

One cannot see the outside of a box while being still inside. Therefore views differ.
 
........She would always ring when I was on deck & had to clamber below to get the phone out of the locker. .......
That's your problem. Keep the phone in pocket to take photos, check charts, and message / tale calls if choose to
I often check MarineTraffic on phone when underway - as range longer than boat one in places with islands and hills - to see if amy friends in the area. Had many impromptu catch ups this way.
 
Talulah I should commend you on asking this question.

Whilst sailing round Britain, my wife was never concerned at all. She knows I am capable and highly experienced. I usually sent a text most evenings if I had moved port. There were a few times this was not possible as I arrived just before dawn. No point sending a message to wake her up to let her know I was fine. There were very few places I could not get any mobile signal. I would say the worst place was Fair Isle between Orkney and Shetland, as I had to walk up a hill to get a signal from Shetland as there are no mobile masts on the island.

I should point out that recipients of messages do not want them to ever disturb their usual routine of sleep. Some years ago I sailed overnight from the Solent to Cherbourg. My daughter wanted to know when I arrived, so I sent a text at 06.30 French time. She was not happy to receive a text at 05.30 and she did not go back to sleep. Tough was my comment after having been up all night.

On a practical side I would advise having the best of safety equipment. A good life jacket with automatic inflation and preferably with a quick release under strain if you fall overboard as you can drown if you are sailing at over 5 knots. Have a PLB on your life jacket as this increases your chance of being located, either alive or dead. This will only work if you can pull out the ariel and start the signal, not possible if you were hit on the head and went overboard. Have a liferaft ready to launch. I also increased the height of my lifelines from 24" to 27" and this is always commented on by other sailors as they feel safer than on their own boats with 24" lifelines. I usually keep my mobile VHF and mobile phone under the sprayhood, ready to use either. I used the phone to take photos and videos, also using google maps in satellite view to view harbours before entering them.

Teach your wife that in many major sailing disasters, that the boat very rarely sinks. Quote the 1979 Fastnet when people abandoned their boats in liferafts and some died, yet the boat remained afloat and was later recovered. The advice is always remain with the boat unless it is sinking as it is easier to spot than a liferaft or man in the water. In the past I have been aboard fully crewed yachts that have suffered a broken mast and a broken rudder, in both cases we were able to return to port without outside assistance. I would recommend that all rigging split pins should only be opened slightly and never taped over. Then just using a pair of pliers you should be able to pull the split pin out quickly to dump the mast before it does major damage to the hull. The boat will be bucking like mad compared to with the mast up, so speed is essential.

If you wife suffers from motion sickness, then make her watch a few videos of sailing in rough weather. My wife is a sufferer and has watched a few of my videos and complains she feels seasick just sitting on a sofa. This also makes her aware that I might not be able to immediately reply or answer a phone. She must learn to trust you and that there are plenty of more dangerous sports than sailing in regular conditions. Extreme conditions can be avoided by remaining in harbour.

Hope this helps.
 
My father sailed with two other friends from Italy to then Yugoslavia while my mother was pregnant of a soon to be born Roberto, communist country and basically no phones then (mid 60s), they brought three carrier pigeons ''it will take a few hours for them to fly back home'' or so they were told: bad weather probably confused the animals and when they released them one defiantly flew towards the USSR, one flew to a tree on the nearby island and stopped there, the third eventually returned home three days later, where everyone was convinced I would be born as orphan :)
 
I appreciate the time you spent to take isolated sentences of my post and contradict them. Of course there is always one scenario where - whatever it is - would have been useful, had we only had it with us...
There's many scenarios both on and off the water where a loved one being able to see where you are is helpful. Some of them are serious, others are trivial. Personally since I'm not bothered if my spouse knows where I am - I just leave it switched on all the time, that saves anyone remembering to turn it on/off.
I also never even hinted that the OP's wife is not smart enough to to grasp the concept of mortality.
Well might I suggest that its precisely because she does understand mortality, probability and ageing that she's brought this up now... ...and "don't worry dear nothing bad had happened before, so won't in the future" means either that speaker or the recipient must be unable to understand that the correlation is a poor one!
Apart from putting a few meanings into my words which never where intended by me, I get the impression that you are defending "technology" in general,
Not really - if you read all my posts properly you'll see that whilst there are technical solutions which may reassure the spouse at home several are not that robust in more remote locations. There was a time pre-mobile phone when sailors could make ship to shore calls, and phone boxes were more prevalent where people would go ashore specifically to "call in". For at least the last 40 years (and probably far longer) the coastguard have encouraged you to tell people where and when you were going and expected to be back. Reading the OP it sounds like he doesn't do that.
while I tried to touch on something like "how to achieve piece of mind without electronic gadgets". Or: less can be more.
I would politely suggest that you've fallen into the trap of thinking peace of mind is about your state not those of the loved one worrying about you! It is really irrelevant if you are at one with nature and "the real value of solitude" if doing so leaves your loved ones in a state of heightened anxiety. It may be entirely a placebo to placate the loved one - but there's almost zero intrusion on your life to sharing your location and providing them minimal reassurance.
One cannot see the outside of a box while being still inside. Therefore views differ.
Not everyone will agree but reaching retirement with a loved one who cares enough to be concerned about you is a good goal for life. Those who aren't merely tolerating their life partner waiting for the grim reaper, will probably agree that making them feel more comfortable about what you are up to (whether its sailing, hill climbing, cycling or life modelling) actually means you will have more opportunities to do what you enjoy without worrying that you are upsetting them.
 
Years ago you weren’t expected to be available now the mobile is meant to summon you and if it doesn’t the negative scenarios start.can you still sendapostcard and expect it to arrive?
You can but the cost of a stamp will probably make your think again! £1.70 (1st class) or 87p for 2nd. If you step ashore at 5pm (Mon) and post it today in some rural UK outpost its likely to be Wed PM at the earliest before it arrives, so perhaps not great for reassurance!
 
I sail solo, we are both old and wife isn't tech savvy, but she does use WhatsApp. I keep her updated on where and when I'm going+ETA, then message her when I get there.
Works for us, even with four day passages to Spain. The answer to what if Q's when on passage is the Police or the like will come knocking!
 
Top