Fire extinguishers

Kerenza

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2011
Messages
416
Location
Newport
www.24bit.ltd.uk
In case anyone has been tempted down the same path as me....

I need to replace some extinguishers and have been impressed with the reasonably new water mist extinguishers. (I class dry powder in the same group as pyrotechnics as far as having them on board).
However after contacting RORc I had the following response:


Apologies for the delay in coming back to you but I’ve only just heard back from our safety specialists who had this to say:

“The water mist fire extinguisher does exactly what it says on the link 1ltr option is proven but not officially rated for A,B,C, & F, whereas the 3Ltr option has all the ratings, it is another option that could be made available to meet RORC rules and regulations.
It’s not a replacement for powder type as I’m not completely convinced that water mist type would be an option for fuel or fat fires.”

In a nut shell we don’t believe that a water mist system can be considered to be the same as the Dry Powder option.

I hope this helps but please do come back to me if I can be of any further assistance.

Best regards,

Not entirely English but I think they won't approve them.

K
 

sarabande

Well-known member
Joined
6 May 2005
Messages
36,013
Visit site
Then the dear old RORC should have a chat with the makers.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=water+mist+oil


I don't know of a better extinguisher product capable of dealing with a range of fire classes, and also not leaving toxic acid residues. I have them on the boat and at home. It's a classic example of new (and sustainable) simple technology beating up ancient chemical extinguishers.
 

bedouin

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
32,524
Visit site
That somewhat contradicts what the manufacturers and most of the industry say about water mist fire extinguishers - but they are not unbiased of course. I know there is a problem with getting them certified for some fires but they genuinely seem a better option that dry powder.

I have recently bought a 3ltr water mist for the boat alongside a couple of small dry powder ones. Hopefully I will never have the need to find out how well they work.

In my case I don't technically meet the RYA recommendation for fire extingusher capacity but as I am not seeking any form of coding or compliance that is not an issue.
 
Joined
22 Nov 2018
Messages
616
Location
Newport IoW
Visit site
Then the dear old RORC should have a chat with the makers.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=water+mist+oil


I don't know of a better extinguisher product capable of dealing with a range of fire classes, and also not leaving toxic acid residues. I have them on the boat and at home. It's a classic example of new (and sustainable) simple technology beating up ancient chemical extinguishers.
Thanks for that Sarabande.
 

rszemeti

Active member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
738
Location
Bewdley, Worcs
Visit site
Personally, I think CO2 on boats has a lot to recommend it.

It can be fed into an engine compartment, gets well into hidden areas of a bilge, up behind panels. Dry Powder is fine, if you can get to the source of the fire, but CO2 can fill a compartment and extinguish any chance of re-ignition. Same with water mist, if the fire is not easily accessible, you are going to struggle to get it out.

My engine bay used to have a Halon extinguisher, but apparently thes have been outlawed by the EU ...
 

Pete7

Well-known member
Joined
11 Aug 2004
Messages
4,085
Location
Gosport
Visit site
Last edited:
Joined
22 Nov 2018
Messages
616
Location
Newport IoW
Visit site
Don't forget the water mist we're talking about uses deionised water, making it suitable for use on live electrical fires.

I didn't know that, the mist nozzles we tried just replaced ordinary Fire Service branch nozzles.
So you can't actually use tap water, or sea water for mist.. just special water from special extinguishers. Ok that's fine for yacht extinguishers anyway.
 

Kerenza

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2011
Messages
416
Location
Newport
www.24bit.ltd.uk
Last edited:

Martin_J

Well-known member
Joined
19 Apr 2006
Messages
4,371
Location
Portsmouth, UK
Visit site
Don't forget the water mist we're talking about uses deionised water, making it suitable for use on live electrical fires.

Kerenza..

As you say, the dry mist 1l does appear to be suitable all the fire types that the dry power covers but it looks like RORC are correct in that you need to go up to the 3l version for rating.... :(

So with RORC, we need the equivalent of the 2 kg dry powder...
How about carrying the required regulation 2kg dry powder extinguishers but also have the smaller water mist extinguishers handy for first use as well.. ?
 

bedouin

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
32,524
Visit site
Kerenza..

As you say, the dry mist 1l does appear to be suitable all the fire types that the dry power covers but it looks like RORC are correct in that you need to go up to the 3l version for rating.... :(

So with RORC, we need the equivalent of the 2 kg dry powder...
How about carrying the required regulation 2kg dry powder extinguishers but also have the smaller water mist extinguishers handy for first use as well.. ?
BTW note that the 3L version (which I have) is larger than you might expect - about the same size as a 6L conventional water extinquisher
 

Martin_J

Well-known member
Joined
19 Apr 2006
Messages
4,371
Location
Portsmouth, UK
Visit site
BTW note that the 3L version (which I have) is larger than you might expect - about the same size as a 6L conventional water extinquisher

Indeed.. And it also looks like the 1l water mist is slightly larger in cylinder diameter than the 2kg dry powder.

15cm instead of the slim 11cm dry powder.

Still looks to be worth getting a small water mist (or two) as well, even if for RORC races we're required to carry 2kg dry powder extinguishers as a minimum.
 

Kerenza

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2011
Messages
416
Location
Newport
www.24bit.ltd.uk
My first thought was exactly that, meet the requirements and also carry dry mist for the real thing, but then I thought it's wrong from all accounts - cost, weight, storage and most importantly possible confusion in the Heat of the moment.
 
Top