skyflyer
Active member
FWIW I have extensive (although not necessarily entirely relevant) experience of refilling cylinders in this way as I used to do a lot of hot-air ballooning. The balloon tanks are aluminium and if you didn't have access to a bulk cylinder you had to decant from "104s', otherwise 47kg cylinders (=104lbs!)
The balloon cylinders were modified aluminium forklift truck cylinders and were fitted with a dip-tube and pressure relief valve. During filling this valve was opened to vent pressure from the aluminium tank which increased the speed of refilling. Once the tank level reached the bottom of the dip tube, liquid started to spurt out and the main valves were shut off. If you delayed it was very easy to get cold-burn off the evaporating liquid from the vent tube!
This left a safe space for expansion if the cylinder warmed up. This was a vital safety measure as the aluminium tanks could and have easily over pressured and burst if there was no expansion space, when heated, even though they had pressure relief valves, in a fire the gas cannot vent quick enough to prevent pressure building up and an explosion (The aforementioned BLEVE)
The disadvantage of a vent tube is that it vents gas! Refuelling fires were not uncommon, caused by some idiot with a lighted cigarette or a static spark!
So with no vent tube the only safe way to do it is by weight. My understanding is that in the USA they dont do exchangeable cylinders like Calor and camping Gaz, but boat owners have a dedicated cylinder on the boat they they get refilled. (and inspected on a schedule) The rule is that it must not be filled more than 42% apparently. I stand to be corrected!
There are further problems with decanting liquid from one cylinder to another. As the filling cylinder empties the gas inside expands and that takes heat from the air and so it cools (ever seen the frosting on the slide of a cylinder that is being rapidly used?). The cooling reduces the pressure so that sometimes no more liquid gas will flow to the 'empty' cylinder, even with the aid of gravity. This is even more likely if there is no vent valve to relieve the pressure in the recipient cylinder, which would be the case on 'boat' cylinders. The solution is to chuck buckets of hot water over the donor cylinder to increase pressure.
The next issue is liquid trapped in the connecting hose. Once refuelling is complete, the tanks should be stood upright and the valves opened to let any liquid in the hose to vaporise back into the cylinders. Then close the valves and only then, disconnect the hose.
If you do this whilst the cylinders are still inverted (i.e. close the valves then disconnect the hose) the hose will be full of liquid gas, which will evaporate and spray out, causing cold burns, fire risk and a lot more volume of gas, once expanded, than a simple hose's worth!.
Of course the steel tanks we use are much more robust than aluminium and are over engineered but bear in mind that the constant "exchange" of empty for new means they are regularly inspected when refilled at the factory, for dents and defects. Before each fill, IIRC. If you are forever re-filling your single cylinder, then who is checking it and testing it?
Just some food for thought.
The balloon cylinders were modified aluminium forklift truck cylinders and were fitted with a dip-tube and pressure relief valve. During filling this valve was opened to vent pressure from the aluminium tank which increased the speed of refilling. Once the tank level reached the bottom of the dip tube, liquid started to spurt out and the main valves were shut off. If you delayed it was very easy to get cold-burn off the evaporating liquid from the vent tube!
This left a safe space for expansion if the cylinder warmed up. This was a vital safety measure as the aluminium tanks could and have easily over pressured and burst if there was no expansion space, when heated, even though they had pressure relief valves, in a fire the gas cannot vent quick enough to prevent pressure building up and an explosion (The aforementioned BLEVE)
The disadvantage of a vent tube is that it vents gas! Refuelling fires were not uncommon, caused by some idiot with a lighted cigarette or a static spark!
So with no vent tube the only safe way to do it is by weight. My understanding is that in the USA they dont do exchangeable cylinders like Calor and camping Gaz, but boat owners have a dedicated cylinder on the boat they they get refilled. (and inspected on a schedule) The rule is that it must not be filled more than 42% apparently. I stand to be corrected!
There are further problems with decanting liquid from one cylinder to another. As the filling cylinder empties the gas inside expands and that takes heat from the air and so it cools (ever seen the frosting on the slide of a cylinder that is being rapidly used?). The cooling reduces the pressure so that sometimes no more liquid gas will flow to the 'empty' cylinder, even with the aid of gravity. This is even more likely if there is no vent valve to relieve the pressure in the recipient cylinder, which would be the case on 'boat' cylinders. The solution is to chuck buckets of hot water over the donor cylinder to increase pressure.
The next issue is liquid trapped in the connecting hose. Once refuelling is complete, the tanks should be stood upright and the valves opened to let any liquid in the hose to vaporise back into the cylinders. Then close the valves and only then, disconnect the hose.
If you do this whilst the cylinders are still inverted (i.e. close the valves then disconnect the hose) the hose will be full of liquid gas, which will evaporate and spray out, causing cold burns, fire risk and a lot more volume of gas, once expanded, than a simple hose's worth!.
Of course the steel tanks we use are much more robust than aluminium and are over engineered but bear in mind that the constant "exchange" of empty for new means they are regularly inspected when refilled at the factory, for dents and defects. Before each fill, IIRC. If you are forever re-filling your single cylinder, then who is checking it and testing it?
Just some food for thought.