steve yates
Well-known member
I am really taken by the little westerly nomads I must admit.
I got that wrong, I meant the westerly 22's, the really unusually shaped little ones
I am really taken by the little westerly nomads I must admit.
Chatted with an owner who had taken his to the Azores,apparently it toddles along quite happily with him at the helm and his wife below reading in force 6.........another sailed to the Caribbean back in the late 1960 iircThere she is. You could hardly ask for a cuter little boat, nor any cheaper. I wonder how she goes, to windward?
She 36 video (slideshow) from 2016:
I dont think he is, I really like the idea of those wee boats too, I'd have one in a heartbeat!What makes me think that you are just trolling carppy boat pictures for the sake of it.
My boats have gone up slowly from 22' to my current 34' and there is no doubt that there is an advantage in size when the weather turns nasty. Many of our best passages have been offwind in a force six, which would have been trying in the smaller boats. The downside of this is that stresses on gear are much greater. Although he gear is well to the task, it does mean that there are some strong forces acting which can be potentially dangerous to crew.That's pretty wise, I think! The bigger and abler the boat, the more prepared we're expected to be, to sail when it's not pleasant.
I've looked at boats specifically because they'd allow me to sail when it's blowing harder than I'd ever want to experience. Daft.
I remember reading (about 25 years ago) an account of this voyage to the Caribbean in the 60's - it was a young lad and his girl friend, and they wrote up their diary (a fore runner of a Blog?) in one of the RCC annual journals.Chatted with an owner who had taken his to the Azores,apparently it toddles along quite happily with him at the helm and his wife below reading in force 6.........another sailed to the Caribbean back in the late 1960 iirc
Nobody should feel that they are "expected" to sail anywhere. It is entirely the individuals choice.That's pretty wise, I think! The bigger and abler the boat, the more prepared we're expected to be, to sail when it's not pleasant.
I've looked at boats specifically because they'd allow me to sail when it's blowing harder than I'd ever want to experience. Daft.
And over the lavatory“If you want to stand up, you can always go on deck!” (E.F.Knight, “The Falcon on the Baltic”, 1889)
I think the really important number is three feet of headroom over the settees
That looks a nice little boatView attachment 83429
Not mine but I had one- two in fact. No 104 from new & no 103 which I rebuilt many years later
The important thing is the sailing qualities.That looks a nice little boat
And over the lavatory
Great loo. I had one for 14 years. the only trouble it ever gave was when we sucked in weed, but that wasn't its fault, and dismantling to clear it was easy. Even the children could work it, without the need to explain the switch on the otherwise excellent Jabscos.“There is always room for an S-L 400”. Lousy lavatory; brilliant advertisement.
As for buying boats that allow one to sail in heavier weather, that is not "daft".
I got that wrong, I meant the westerly 22's, the really unusually shaped little ones
Yes , of course most of us have budgetary limitations of one level or another. But just do not make the mistake of buying something silly, like the first pic in your post 162Yeah, yeah. Can't you tell, I'm looking for the advantages of budgetary limitations!