F33 or S34

russ

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Messages
901
Location
North East Hampshire
Visit site
Some may know my hunt for a S34 has been to say the least difficult.

Should I now consider the F33? What are the pros and cons between the two models.
My original concern raised by others was that whilst up on the fly deck you can be left isolated whilst your guest are enjoying the rear deck.
Also lack of control in windy conditions and bridge heights if we end up back on the Thames.

Advantages of all year round use and more living space are an attraction.

Your views?
 
Ultimately it comes down to what your preference is Russ. The F33 is a great package but with some downsides, which you have mentioned. The living space point is interesting because I tend to include the cockpit in this as it is inevitably where we spend most of our time. Even when we had out Broom 41 the cockpit was the first choice and we only moved to the saloon when it got a little chilly. The heating system didn’t include the cockpit on that boat and whilst I did a few upgrades I never got round to sorting the cockpit heating.

My personal view is that the lower helm on many flybridge boats is a compromise with a ‘letter box’ view through the often shallow windscreen and up top it is usually cold (in the UK).

So, perhaps unsurprisingly, it would be the S34 with cockpit heating every time for me but I am sure that an F33 owner will be along shortly to give an entirely different view :)
 
Last edited:
Should I now consider the F33? What are the pros and cons between the two models.

Your views?

My berthing neighbour used to have one. Make sure you get one with a powerful bow thruster- his didnt have one. Maybe it was his lack of experience but it was a pig to berth on a windy day - many times we had to fend him off
 
Low speed handling on the F33 is not an issue.
The F36 or 360 is a 50% bigger boat and possibly the best model ever made by Sealine.
 
Some may know my hunt for a S34 has been to say the least difficult.

Should I now consider the F33? What are the pros and cons between the two models.
My original concern raised by others was that whilst up on the fly deck you can be left isolated whilst your guest are enjoying the rear deck.
Also lack of control in windy conditions and bridge heights if we end up back on the Thames.

Advantages of all year round use and more living space are an attraction.

Your views?

I think the F33 is one of sealines worst sea boats. It is awful in a quartering sea, and heels alarmingly.

If you only go out when it’s flat the accommodation is great for its size.

I’d happily own an S34 but not an F33.
 
I think the F33 is one of sealines worst sea boats. It is awful in a quartering sea, and heels alarmingly. .

I think that would apply to all small stern drive flybridge boats. I doubt the 305,310,320 or even F34 are any better/worse and the same would apply to 30ish foot models from other manufacturers.
 
I think the F33 is one of sealines worst sea boats. It is awful in a quartering sea, and heels alarmingly.

If you only go out when it’s flat the accommodation is great for its size.

I’d happily own an S34 but not an F33.
The S34 and F33 hulls look much the same in principle .
You obviously had a bad experience in a F33 but you obviously survived. Maybe that particular sea state would have been equally bad in another boat of the same size .
 
I think that would apply to all small stern drive flybridge boats. I doubt the 305,310,320 or even F34 are any better/worse and the same would apply to 30ish foot models from other manufacturers.

The 30 - 320 have the same basic hull, on the 330 the engine centre distance was increased to give better slow speed handling.


Brian
 
Some may know my hunt for a S34 has been to say the least difficult.

Should I now consider the F33? What are the pros and cons between the two models.
My original concern raised by others was that whilst up on the fly deck you can be left isolated whilst your guest are enjoying the rear deck.
Also lack of control in windy conditions and bridge heights if we end up back on the Thames.

Advantages of all year round use and more living space are an attraction.

Your views?

My client just sold his , best one out there at least I could have vouched for it .
 
Low speed handling on the F33 is not an issue.
The F36 or 360 is a 50% bigger boat and possibly the best model ever made by Sealine.

Having spent a week on a 360, we took out a F33 in similar conditions. Completely different boat, much more jumpy and not as solid footed.
 
I think that would apply to all small stern drive flybridge boats. I doubt the 305,310,320 or even F34 are any better/worse and the same would apply to 30ish foot models from other manufacturers.

I had a 30 ft bayliner sterndive flybridge that I took to the Channel Islands and France on a number of occasions and took her out in some serious weather too.
She was an infinitely better sea boat than an F33.
I love sealines BTW am now on my second and have driven quite a few more including the S34 and F37.
 
The S34 and F33 hulls look much the same in principle .
You obviously had a bad experience in a F33 but you obviously survived. Maybe that particular sea state would have been equally bad in another boat of the same size .


Yes I survived - of course. And I disagree with you that others are as bad I think the F33 is a bad sea boat.
It’s still a good boat if you don’t go out in lumpy seas - it’s a tardis.
 
Having spent a week on a 360, we took out a F33 in similar conditions. Completely different boat, much more jumpy and not as solid footed.
The 360 is 50 % bigger , heavier, wider beam . So naturally it will have better stability.
 
Worth tracking down the MB&Y test report on the F33 and read the comments about handling.
Probably more at home on non tidal waters.
 
Top