BurnitBlue
Well-Known Member
Just saying.
Practical Boat Owner could be a great magazine, if they looked at its name before considering articles....same stories..
Practical Boat Owner could be a great magazine, if they looked at its name before considering articles.
It should contain practical articles for boat owners (see, the clue is in the name): how to fix stuff, how to build stuff, how to do stuff, new stuff to make the boat better/safer.
It should not contain articles about: The Solent (done to death), new boats (we've got one, remember?), our cruise to Whogivesashit (who gives a ...).
Read it in 2007 and saw it last week in tesco's, same stories..
Will they do the 'how to build the Den Ashton long-boat' article again? That first appeared in the '70's, must be due for a resurface by now![]()
Whilst I agree about the Solent I'm interested in new boats and other people's cruises; they both give my dreams a kick start on long motorway journeys.
Then buy YM, a magazine without the word "Practical" in the name.
If you have better content to put in the mag why not write it down and sell it to them like Dylan does? Or failing that, suggest a topic to them and they will write it for you. The reason for the south coast weighting is simply that the vast majority of boating happens there, the magazine is based there, and the magazine's people are based there along with their boats. This month though, there's an article about the Isle of Man![]()
How do I cancel my subscription.The problem with PBO is that the Editor is a woman.
The problem with PBO is that the Editor is a woman. Sarah is a top Editor and no arguments about that; BUT, being a women she will never understand the importance and attraction of getting your hands dirty and mending something, or building something or maintaining something. The publishers are of a similar mindset and it's only the likes of the hands-on nuts like David that keep what little practical stuff there is, to be found within. Having said that the latest issue is practical-rich so not all bad.
The problem with PBO is that the Editor is a woman. Sarah is a top Editor and no arguments about that; BUT, being a women she will never understand the importance and attraction of getting your hands dirty and mending something, or building something or maintaining something. The publishers are of a similar mindset and it's only the likes of the hands-on nuts like David that keep what little practical stuff there is, to be found within. Having said that the latest issue is practical-rich so not all bad.
Sorry what year is this?
Perhaps the thought of all that research and picture taking and writing and polishing for about £100 a page puts people off.If you have better content to put in the mag why not write it down and sell it to them like Dylan does?
being a women she will never understand the importance and attraction of getting your hands dirty and mending something, or building something or maintaining something.
The problem with PBO is that the Editor is a woman. Sarah is a top Editor and no arguments about that; BUT, being a women she will never understand the importance and attraction of getting your hands dirty and mending something, or building something or maintaining something. .