westernman
Well-known member
Or at least 1/4 of an inch.Far too close. Make it 200m. If it's anything like St Albans Head on a blustery day, 12,000m
On the best chart you have.
Or at least 1/4 of an inch.Far too close. Make it 200m. If it's anything like St Albans Head on a blustery day, 12,000m
Like many of us here, you must be really bored too, to write this script......but I like itOP - I suspect that you were just poking your honey coated stick into the YBW forum ant nest when you made your original post. Maybe you thought that innocently asking for anchor purchase advice was too much like shooting fish in a barrel. Perhaps you thought that the forum carnage would be too brutal and violent if you asked .... "Was my mate
right when he said that "the number of hulls on the boat that you buy is proportionate to the buyer's IQ"?.
Yet, with only one baited hook, you have managed to catch twelve pages of agonised forum posts on the subject of 'electronica vs. historica'.
The strange thing is that the whole thread seems to have been marvellously civilised and amicable. There is an unprecedented air of mutual respect and rationality in the discussion. How has this come about in the forum's Tweed vs Lycra sailing fraternity? Is this some sort of strange lock-down zen aberration?
It is almost as if nobody is willing to lie down on their (full size) chart table and stab themselves through the heart with their (slightly bent) school dividers and bleed to death on their paper charts to protect their domain against the threat of raster charts creeping onboard.
And similarly, people who have half a dozen different tablets, laptops and phones on board running different chart software on IOS, android and windows are happy to admit that having the extra weight of a 2B pencil and a piece of paper probably won't sink their high powered racing machine.
Has the pandemic brought universal yachting harmony. Has it brought the Age of Aquarius for navigators?
Are you the one to bring everyone together?
Or are you just a very naughty boy?,
Just to put you right hereIt is almost as if nobody is willing to lie down on their (full size) chart table and stab themselves through the heart with their (slightly bent) school dividers and bleed to death on their paper charts to protect their domain against the threat of raster charts creeping onboard.
And similarly, people who have half a dozen different tablets, laptops and phones on board running different chart software on IOS, android and windows are happy to admit that having the extra weight of a 2B pencil and a piece of paper probably won't sink their high powered racing machine.
Or are you just a very naughty boy?
Pah, who needs to rely on all this technology. You should be able to tell where you're going by feeling the direction of the wave train and watching the star road unfold. During daylight hours the rise and set of the sun will give your a perfectly adequate sense of which way you are pointing without the need for any of these modern gadgets.These fancy gadgets will never replace the astrolabe and lodestone.
Knowing where you are is overrated.Pah, who needs to rely on all this technology. You should be able to tell where you're going by feeling the direction of the wave train and watching the star road unfold. During daylight hours the rise and set of the sun will give your a perfectly adequate sense of which way you are pointing without the need for any of these modern gadgets.
Well not really.Knowing where you are is overrated.
All you really need to know is in which direction you should be pointing.
That's an interesting point I'd never considered before. If one were to spend long enough navigating and paying attention, could you do away with the sextant altogether and just know where you are based on seeing the stars? They are, after all, just another visual clue to location. On a big passage eyeballing the sky might be sufficiently accurate tooPah, who needs to rely on all this technology. You should be able to tell where you're going by feeling the direction of the wave train and watching the star road unfold. During daylight hours the rise and set of the sun will give your a perfectly adequate sense of which way you are pointing without the need for any of these modern gadgets.
Someone should give it a shot and write it up...Depart from SW UK, pick one of the Azores to aim for. Not allowed to do anything other than look at the sky, mk1 eyeball, no fancy instruments. What can ppssibly go wrong?!That's an interesting point I'd never considered before. If one were to spend long enough navigating and paying attention, could you do away with the sextant altogether and just know where you are based on seeing the stars? They are, after all, just another visual clue to location. On a big passage eyeballing the sky might be sufficiently accurate too
Nieuwpoort is nicer than Ostend.Well not really.
I always though that I would know where I was when I got there. But the very first time I sailed to Ostend,(via Longsand Head) I found myself just offshore by about a .5 mile, only to be told that it was Nieuwpoort.
No it is not. It is a retirement home, with a few( lots actually) art shops. Little entertainment, apart from a couple of firework displays every year.Nieuwpoort is nicer than Ostend.
I think you would be surprised how successful that would be. You’d have to assume they have all the old navigational aids apart from sextant like an accurate calibrated log and tidal and ocean current tables. Get within 50 miles of any of the group and the sky will tell you mostly where the group is. The gamble of course is a week of low cloud.Someone should give it a shot and write it up...Depart from SW UK, pick one of the Azores to aim for. Not allowed to do anything other than look at the sky, mk1 eyeball, no fancy instruments. What can ppssibly go wrong?!
I would agree that knowing where you are is critical; the real question is: when this stage of knowingness comes to be.Well not really.
I always though that I would know where I was when I got there. But the very first time I sailed to Ostend,(via Longsand Head) I found myself just offshore by about a .5 mile, only to be told that it was Nieuwpoort.
I think Mike Peyton was watching you. One of his cartoons shows a yacht entering between pier heads, crew on deck says "do you know what courtesy flag we need yet skip"Well not really.
I always though that I would know where I was when I got there. But the very first time I sailed to Ostend,(via Longsand Head) I found myself just offshore by about a .5 mile, only to be told that it was Nieuwpoort.
Pacific Islanders were doing long passages overnight for many centuries using exactly this technique long before the long pork showed up with charts and sextants.That's an interesting point I'd never considered before. If one were to spend long enough navigating and paying attention, could you do away with the sextant altogether and just know where you are based on seeing the stars? They are, after all, just another visual clue to location. On a big passage eyeballing the sky might be sufficiently accurate too
Someone should give it a shot and write it up...Depart from SW UK, pick one of the Azores to aim for. Not allowed to do anything other than look at the sky, mk1 eyeball, no fancy instruments. What can ppssibly go wrong?!
Pah, who needs to rely on all this technology. You should be able to tell where you're going by feeling the direction of the wave train and watching the star road unfold. During daylight hours the rise and set of the sun will give your a perfectly adequate sense of which way you are pointing without the need for any of these modern gadgets.