MapisM
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Clever, he handled it perfectly.
Saying "what if an engine failed"...
[/ QUOTE ]I don't get your logic.
My "what if" was just because regardless of how low the risk is, it was totally unnecessary to take it in that situation. He had the clearance for an easier and safer maneuver, approaching the dock at a normal 45 degrees angle, instead of 90 or so.
And he wasn't actually that slow, before reversing - hence my comment.
Otoh, if he posted a video showing the proper maneuver for that situation, he would have got just some "yawn" in reply...
See, I know a harbour pilot who could have made a similar approach against a 30kts wind and with one engine not working. And much faster than that, either ('cause it would have been the only way to do it against 30kts wind).
But in the same conditions of that video, I' sure he would have never made such approach.
So, who is clever and who is foolish?
Clever, he handled it perfectly.
Saying "what if an engine failed"...
[/ QUOTE ]I don't get your logic.
My "what if" was just because regardless of how low the risk is, it was totally unnecessary to take it in that situation. He had the clearance for an easier and safer maneuver, approaching the dock at a normal 45 degrees angle, instead of 90 or so.
And he wasn't actually that slow, before reversing - hence my comment.
Otoh, if he posted a video showing the proper maneuver for that situation, he would have got just some "yawn" in reply...
See, I know a harbour pilot who could have made a similar approach against a 30kts wind and with one engine not working. And much faster than that, either ('cause it would have been the only way to do it against 30kts wind).
But in the same conditions of that video, I' sure he would have never made such approach.
So, who is clever and who is foolish?