Seajet
...
http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=6475
http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=200
There's 5Kgs in the displacement and the Anderson is carrying more than that in extra ballast.
They're actually very similar boats, but sheesh, have it your way, sub 22 for 25.
I know both boats, have you even seen an Anderson 22 ?
The Catalina / Jaguar 22 may be around the same length with a lift keel, that's it.
The Anderson has the ballast in a bulb on the lower end of the keel, where it does must good; the bulb is veed on top so when the keel is up, mud, weed & stones don't jam the keel.
The Catalina has a ballast stub on the hull - where it does least good - with a swing plate - vulnerable to wear on the plate and pivot.
The Anderson has a decent interior with separate loo & forecabin - the Cartalina is open plan.
The Anderson has the outboard in a well so the prop stays immersed - best option for this size boat as an inboard is too heavy and an expensive pain when old.
The Catalina again goes for the unthinking answer of sticking the outboard on a transom pad
.
More to the point, and above all else, I have seen two Catalina 22 lift keelers on shore, where the hull had sagged around the ballast stub like pudding - hardly in the same build class,
Next time you make bland assertions, don't do it with someone who built the subject 38 years ago and has known it ever since, discussing with original builders, a lot of owners and transat racers...:encouragement: