Damaged radome in boatyard

RadiumRob

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 Sep 2011
Messages
148
Location
Portland Marina
Visit site
My mast was removed by marina yard staff when my boat was lifted out a few weeks ago. I wasn't present, and when I visited the boat a few days later I found the mast propped on a couple of beer barrels, with the radome resting on the ground and a sizeable crack in it. I complained to the marina office, but they blamed the rigger, saying they don't accept responsibility for storage of the mast in their yard. We placed a small block of wood under the radome to protect it from scuffing the ground, but could do no more.

When I returned today I found that the mast was off the barrels and resting solely on the radome, which is now severely damaged. The marina office again denied responsibility and claimed it had been blown off by the wind. I find that very unlikely, it's a 34' boat and a very heavy mast, and it's more likely it was knocked when they moved neighbouring boats. They did help to lift and turn the mast over so the radome was no longer on the ground (I have removed it now).

Any views on where responsibility lies? Both rigger and marina deny responsibility, but they are both being paid for their services - the marina for lifting in/out, storage and mast operations, and the rigger form replacing standing rigging.

To make matters worse, the radome was discontinued recently, it's very unlikely I can source a spare case, which means buying a replacement discontinued unit (£1000?) or upgrading plotter and buying a digital radome (many £000s).
 
Did you engage them to do the work separately, or did you deal just with the yard who subcontracted part of it to the rigger? If the latter, I'd say it's the yard's problem whoever actually did the damage.

Pete
 
Hadn't spotted them, but notice there's a Raytheon 2kW cover, model number M92650 for sale there. Seller is also listing an 18" antenna which is probably from this unit.

Does anyone know if the RD218/M92650 cases are interchangeable?

Thanks.
 
Yes, it does look quite different. It's also in Riga!

The newer digital radomes look nearly identical to the RD218, so I suppose it may be the case that one of those would fit the bill. I'll check with Raymarine.

Thanks again.
 
Does he not only need a canister & not the "Gubbins"


The newer digital radomes look nearly identical to the RD218, so I suppose it may be the case that one of those would fit the bill. I'll check with Raymarine.
Sadly, I think you'll find the newer digital radomes won't work with older radar/plotters.
 
That's right - I only need the casing. The chances of the inner moulding/mounting holes etc matching up are slight. Planned redundancy - that's what our economy is predicated on.
 
My mast was removed by marina yard staff when my boat was lifted out a few weeks ago. I wasn't present, and when I visited the boat a few days later I found the mast propped on a couple of beer barrels, with the radome resting on the ground and a sizeable crack in it. I complained to the marina office, but they blamed the rigger, saying they don't accept responsibility for storage of the mast in their yard. We placed a small block of wood under the radome to protect it from scuffing the ground, but could do no more.

When I returned today I found that the mast was off the barrels and resting solely on the radome, which is now severely damaged. The marina office again denied responsibility and claimed it had been blown off by the wind. I find that very unlikely, it's a 34' boat and a very heavy mast, and it's more likely it was knocked when they moved neighbouring boats. They did help to lift and turn the mast over so the radome was no longer on the ground (I have removed it now).

Any views on where responsibility lies? Both rigger and marina deny responsibility, but they are both being paid for their services - the marina for lifting in/out, storage and mast operations, and the rigger form replacing standing rigging.

To make matters worse, the radome was discontinued recently, it's very unlikely I can source a spare case, which means buying a replacement discontinued unit (£1000?) or upgrading plotter and buying a digital radome (many £000s).

I would sue the boatyard and let them join the rigger in the action by counter-claiming against him.
 
That's an idea.

I'm not keen on following legal route - only the lawyers tend to win, and Sybarite's (presumably tongue in cheek) suggestion brings Jarndyce and Jarndyce to mind. However, I would like the relevant party to accept responsibility without recourse to law.
 
Top