Council tax

tritonofnor

New member
Joined
12 May 2003
Messages
463
Location
Yacht Haven Quay, Plymouth, Devon UK
Visit site
I live on my boat in Plymouth, and the local tv station want to interview me as part of a series on "alternative" housing. Thing is I haven't paid council tax up until now, and want to know how liable I am if I get caught out! Boat is fully mobile, and is taken out lots but is still my main residence. Any one got a definitive answer?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Steve Clayton

New member
Joined
22 May 2003
Messages
7,479
Location
Benitachell - Spain
www.aloeland.co.uk
Your answer might be in these examples; hope example 1 applies!!

Example 1

A man lives on a motor cruiser with living accommodation on board. He rents a berth in a marina comprising a finger pontoon at right angles to the bank with water supply and sewage pump-out. The marina operator controls access to the site and reserves a continual right to move the boat from its mooring. When the boat is absent, as it frequently is for weekends and holidays, and even though the boat owner pays rent continuously in order to reserve a berth at the site, the marina operator allows other boats to use the mooring.

Although the mooring is virtually in permanent use and affords self-containment to any boat with living accommodation, the cruiser owner's occupation of the mooring is non-exclusive and insufficiently permanent for him to be liable for Council Tax. The marina operator is in paramount occupation of the mooring for the purposes of his business of running a marina. If the other boats which use the mooring are also someone's sole or main residence, only the mooring would be domestic property and subject to banding. The boat itself would not be included in the valuation.

If the other boats which use the mooring are not someone's sole or main residence or there is no way of knowing what their use would be, the mooring will be non-domestic. If there are two or more such moorings in the marina, all the moorings and land under the control of the marina operator should be treated as one hereditament by virtue of the Multiple Moorings Regulations. The marina operator will be in permanent occupation.

Example 2

A couple live on a narrow boat as their sole or main residence. They pay a mooring fee to the British Waterways Board for one of several moorings along the towing path and a licence fee to be on the canal. They share a water tap with the other boats, but the nearest sewage disposal facility is some distance away. Periodically, they move the boat to dispose of sewage; and every few years the boat is taken into dry dock for essential maintenance. British Waterways Board reserves a continual right to allocate a different mooring, for example, in order to accommodate boats of different length at the site, but in practice the boat returns to the same mooring, which is not used by other boats in its absence It has a postal address and post is delivered direct to the boat.

The mooring is domestic property by virtue of s.66(4) and sufficiently defined as to form a separate hereditament. The boat is moored with a sufficient degree of permanence as to be enjoyed with the mooring and therefore should be regarded as part of the hereditament and be included in the valuation for banding purposes.

If however the separate moorings along the canal bank are not easily identified, either in the agreement with BWB or on the ground, and can vary each time a boat is moored, as the boat always returns to a different position, then the hereditament will comprise of the whole length of moorings along that part of the canal, and the rateable occupier will be the BWB. The boat will not form part of the hereditament because it lacks sufficient permanence to be enjoyed with the land.

If the moorings are solely occupied by boats which are the sole or residence of an individual, then there will be a single Council Tax banding of all the moorings. However, should pleasure boats also use the moorings, the moorings should be treated as a composite hereditament. In many cases a common sense view will need to be taken of the extent of the domestic and non-domestic parts, and regulation 7(1) of the Council Tax (Situation and Valuation of Dwellings) Regulations 1992 requires a band to be ascribed which reflects the value which would reasonably attributed to the domestic use. The distribution between domestic and non domestic use will therefore reflect how the market would view the use of the hereditament, if it were made available with vacant possession. The actual use of the moorings at 1 April 1993, or a notional distribution based on the prevailing pattern of use along moorings in that locality can be adopted.

Where a single composite hereditament is appropriate, the non domestic part in this example will be included in the Central List assessment for BWB, and a single Council Tax band will be entered in the valuation list for the residential moorings.



<hr width=100% size=1>
 

ubuysa

New member
Joined
4 Jan 2004
Messages
348
Location
Mediterranean
Visit site
Let's hope a certain Gordon Brown doesn't read this forum otherwise example 1 won't stay that way for long /forums/images/icons/wink.gif

Tony C.

<hr width=100% size=1>There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.
 

paulrossall

New member
Joined
22 Oct 2001
Messages
1,058
Visit site
Steve
How confident are you that the interesting post you have made is correct? Can you tell us where the information came from. It is certainly very clearly worded and thought out. Thanks. Paul

<hr width=100% size=1>" there is nothing-absolutely nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats".
 

AndrewB

Well-known member
Joined
7 Jun 2001
Messages
5,852
Location
Dover/Corfu
Visit site
Interesting site, thanks Steve. It does look as if liability for council tax hinges on whether the occupation of the berth is regarded as "sufficiently permanent". This is conspicuously not defined in this guidance, but there is a hint that "moving away for brief periods of say 2 to 4 weeks" in a period of 12 months would not be sufficient.

Clearly the clause in marina agreements that allows them to re-let the berth to visitors when vacant is actually helpful here. It's often regarded as a fiddle!

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top