Costa Concordia (Titanic 2012)

masterofnone

Active member
Joined
24 Feb 2004
Messages
725
Location
Newhaven. East Sussex
Visit site
Human Error

They thought they were further north than they actually were, made the port turn realised the mistake too late, tried to squeeze through the gap in the rocks to salvage the error and ended up as salvage.
 

janeczku

New member
Joined
14 Jan 2012
Messages
5
Visit site
Here is a close-up shot of the rock/debris that got stuck in the hull.

lo_scolio2.jpg
 

Kukri

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jul 2008
Messages
15,568
Location
East coast UK. Mostly. Sometimes the Philippines
Visit site
Incidentally I was wrong about the propulsion system - conventional props not azipods, with AC synchronous motors. Pretty much what the RN is putting in now. Almost all big cruise ships are diesel electric now, because you can switch the load between propulsion at night and hotel services in daytime.
 

[32511]

...
Joined
18 Oct 2008
Messages
11,735
Visit site
She seems to have been turning to starboard when she hit- the port stabiliser appears undamaged, even though there is the almighty gash on the port side further towards the stern.

ETA: So, turning starboard away from the rocks at last minute, and heeling to port- explains why the gash is near the waterline. Obviously she is then badly holed, so turns to port to: a/ heel to starboard, to try and reduce water ingress, and b/ beach her as near to the harbour as possible.
Explains the 180 degree turn, and the direction of list.
 
Last edited:

Seajet

...
Joined
23 Sep 2010
Messages
29,177
Location
West Sussex / Hants
Visit site
I think there's quite a difference between 'detained for questioning' - as in this case - and 'jailed' ! Another Officer has been as well; I'd think it a pretty obvious move in the circumstances, may well be routine; though I wouldn't particularly want to be in his shoes right now.
 

starfire

Well-known member
Joined
7 May 2005
Messages
1,216
Location
In the Med
Visit site
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ster-what-could-have-caused-the-accident.html



" The explosion heard by many of the passengers on the Italian cruise ship, the Costa Concordia, may have been caused by a phenomenon known as “harmonic interference”, according to Malcolm Latarche, the editor of the global shipping magazine IHS Fairplay Solutions. "

That seems to be a half-baked reference to the MAIB report of the QE2, which was discussed on here recently, where there problems in one of the harmonic filters, supplying the drives for the propulsion motors.

http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/investigation_reports/2011/qm2.cfm
 
Last edited:

janeczku

New member
Joined
14 Jan 2012
Messages
5
Visit site
Some updates taken from the italian press:

Captain in custody

The italian "Corriere" has the news, that the master of the Costa Concordia, Mr. Schittino, has been put in police custody.
He is maintaining not only that the islet/rock wasn't marked on his charts but also that his ship was cruising on a designated waterway between the island and the eastern mainland with 12 n.m. separation to the coast.

New hypothesis for the change of course in the direction of the island

According to city counsel of the island Giglio, Antonio Belardo, it has occurred in the past for the cruise ship to pass the port at close range in order to salute the local population.

This is confirmed by footage here, which actually shows the Concordia doing that stunt on a passage in August 2011.

The 180 degrees turn at the port entrance

According to the newspaper, the crew casted anchor 600 meters off the harbor for a fast tacking in order to beach on the shore or the reef (The harbour is to small for such a big vessel).
 

MapisM

Well-known member
Joined
11 Mar 2002
Messages
20,493
Visit site
I think there's quite a difference between 'detained for questioning' - as in this case - and 'jailed' ! Another Officer has been as well; I'd think it a pretty obvious move in the circumstances, may well be routine; though I wouldn't particularly want to be in his shoes right now.
100% agreed. Also on your last sentence!
 

Erik C

Active member
Joined
21 Nov 2010
Messages
4,432
Location
Spain
Visit site
I think there's quite a difference between 'detained for questioning' - as in this case - and 'jailed' ! Another Officer has been as well; I'd think it a pretty obvious move in the circumstances, may well be routine; though I wouldn't particularly want to be in his shoes right now.


OK, Let me rephrase that. The captain is not going home tonight.
 

Boomshanka

New member
Joined
18 Aug 2007
Messages
2,406
Location
Côte d'Solent
Visit site
Interesting write up on Sky, including the rock hypothesis (clicky) ... also that the Captain and FO were arrested for abandoning ship whilst the evacuation was still underway :eek::mad:

"Local prosecutor Francesco Verusio confirmed the captain and the ship's first officer Ciro Ambrosio had both been detained in custody on suspicion of abandoning ship while passengers were still in danger and multiple manslaughter."
 

onesea

Well-known member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
3,830
Location
Solent based..
Visit site
Just playing devils advocate...:eek:

I did wonder if this is one of those cases where the GPS is spot on, but the chart from a 200 year old survey isn't...but that would still mean someone was pushing their luck in a big way.

It also occurred to me that as this was the last night of the cruise, was the Captain hosting the traditional 'Captains' Table' meal so absent from the bridge ( I bet he wishes he had been ) or was this later on...

Captains have to sleep to, just need officers they can trust...

I wonder what her AVS curve looks like....?

Do commercial liners have a STIX category ...?

and if not why not ...?

Called Load line regulations and lots of requirements and loop holes...

As this thread refers to the Titanic, I have lifted this paragraph from my post in the Lounge:
I have long made comments about cruise ships looking like floating blocks of flats, with anything up to 15 decks above the waterline, which means that they must have a pretty poor angle of vanishing stability, as this tragedy appears to prove. It is notable that when the Titanic sank, it stayed upright and plunged bow first. Maybe it is time that cruise liner design was re-thought to make future ones look a bit more like ships and less like blocks of flats.
__________________
Hmm could be argued, depends on where her freeboard deck is... Angle of Vanishing stability could be surprisingly high ship stability is not that straight forward...
Although I agree they do not strike me as the most sea worthy ships at sea...


OK, Let me rephrase that. The captain is not going home tonight.

That give the circumstances would be quite normal, atleast this captain will be deal with quickly...
http://www.abelard.org/news/oil040629.php
http://www.aos-world.org/articles/criminalisation.htm

Seeing the sail past last year I wonder if these same detour was planned but went horribly horribly wrong...
Confused navigator misinterpreting information, not used to deviating form passage plan?
 

Boomshanka

New member
Joined
18 Aug 2007
Messages
2,406
Location
Côte d'Solent
Visit site
Seeing the sail past last year I wonder if these same detour was planned but went horribly horribly wrong...
Confused navigator misinterpreting information, not used to deviating form passage plan?

What was the original route/destination, anyone know? It's not been unknown for pilots to take a low pass detour over a friends/family's house... no doubt all will be revealed sooner or later.
 
Top