boatone
Well-Known Member
Indeed I have - ad nauseum along with many others. And, in general, they have been doing just that. In fact, we are fortunate that due to spending on infrastructure in recent years the river is actually in better shape than it has been for some years past. The winter works programme is testament to that and you will be aware that the river has indeed been closed to navigation whilst refurbishment of locks, replacement of gates etc has been carried out.You might also want to point out (and possibly already have) that there is a statutory right of navigation on the River Thames and that as the navigation authority for the river, the EA would, it seems be obligated to maintain the infrastructure required to enable that navigation.
Lack of resources made available by central government does not make the EA "unfit for purpose". It means that the EA cannot perform its purpose due to the constraints placed on it by government. The reason that the EA waterways have not already been transferred to C&RT is because government have not been prepared to provide the dowry and ongoing grants that C&RT would require to take on the responsibility. Please don't even mention privatisation !If by cutbacks to their funding the EA are no longer capable of doing so, then they are unfit for purpose. In which case government needs to either re-think the EA's funding options, if give their role as navigation authority to an organisation that can raise appropriate funding.