Poignard
Well-Known Member
No. It's not sharp enough.To put it in some form of perspective imagine in a job interview mentioning you are a “ well known member” would it cut any ice?
No. It's not sharp enough.To put it in some form of perspective imagine in a job interview mentioning you are a “ well known member” would it cut any ice?
.........the English language!No. It's not sharp enough.
Of course content is the most important, it's what this and other forums are about. But everyone wants to be liked.Well, I'd never noticed there was a like button. Content is surely more important ?
A music teacher for many years, I am still considered a 'newbie' on one music teacher's forum, joined in 2006 and posted 49 ( helpful ) times LOL
Glad to see we got you over the line.Of course content is the most important, it's what this and other forums are about. But everyone wants to be liked.
Congratulations but please remember that your elevated status comes with some additional responsibilities likeI'm overwhelmed by my new status.
When you posted that, you were well known.I've noticed that members of this forum are given different statuses. I'm an 'active member' but there are also 'new members' and many more. Is there a list somewhere of what the different ones mean?
Most of its users are definitely ‘pre-computer old’ ?didn't realise the forum was pre-computer old, that's smart![]()
When you posted that, you were well known.
To be "pre-computer", you'd have to have been born before 1941 - that is, over 80. The Zuse 3 (not widely known outside Germany) was built in 1941. To be older than the CONCEPT, you'd have to have been born before 1840, when Babbage designed and attempted to build his analytical engine, which would probably have worked if Babbage had been more focussed and less liable to change designs. A modern replica works, and was built to 19th century tolerances.Most of its users are definitely ‘pre-computer old’ ?
If becoming a "Well Known Member" only requires 1000 posts, how come that I am only an active member despite having over 21,000 posts? Is it in fact based on posts made since the forums moved to the new format?
When it comes to quantity (as opposed to quality) PVB is miles ahead anyone else posting!!As of an hour ago his message count was 37,752 (and climbing)
In contrast Jumbleduck 19983, ghostlymoron 9,076, rotrax 8,849, Wansworth 13,528, Neeves 5,823
No I wasn't. I think my status must have changed on all my posts retrospectively.When you posted that, you were well known.
![]()