Channel Light Vessel no more.

glynd

Active member
Joined
28 Dec 2016
Messages
126
Visit site
They have a picture of the old light vessel...
Would it have hurt to show a picture of what's going to replace it?!
 

Giblets

Well-known member
Joined
5 Mar 2006
Messages
9,254
Location
Surrey
Visit site
They have a picture of the old light vessel...
Would it have hurt to show a picture of what's going to replace it?!
Channel-Light-Buoy.jpg


Nearly 10m tall above the water.
 

Giblets

Well-known member
Joined
5 Mar 2006
Messages
9,254
Location
Surrey
Visit site
I guess the shipping forecast will change slightly now then as well!
The shipping forecast won't as that deals with areas but I expect the Marine Observation Report will change in due course. The conditions reported from the new buoy are the same as from the old light vessel.
 

matt1

Well-known member
Joined
11 Feb 2005
Messages
1,240
Location
Hamble, UK
Visit site
Well it certainly seems like you can't currently get as much data. Hopefully it's just a question of it not enabled yet and in time it will come. For instance no wave height or vis, wind gust
 

Gary Fox

N/A
Joined
31 Oct 2020
Messages
2,027
Visit site
Presuma
Well it certainly seems like you can't currently get as much data. Hopefully it's just a question of it not enabled yet and in time it will come. For instance no wave height or vis, wind gust
I think buoys in that neck of the woods get so beaten up by the weather that missing data is common, I used to log on to the Sandettie version often, and there was usually something missing, or nonsensical readings like 0.01m wave heights.
 

Sybarite

Well-known member
Joined
7 Dec 2002
Messages
27,694
Location
France
Visit site
Presuma

I think buoys in that neck of the woods get so beaten up by the weather that missing data is common, I used to log on to the Sandettie version often, and there was usually something missing, or nonsensical readings like 0.01m wave heights.

I don't understand how they determine the degree of visibility.
 

grumpy_o_g

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jan 2005
Messages
18,995
Location
South Coast
Visit site

"Following the grounding of the Amoco Cadiz in 1978, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted the Off Casquets Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) in 1979; Trinity House established the Channel Lightvessel so as to clearly define the new TSS to all mariners at a time when such schemes were a relatively new maritime feature.​
As part of the continuous review of its provision of aids to navigation—and further to the discontinuation of the East Channel buoy in 2018—Trinity House has carried out extensive analysis on the requirement for the Channel Lightvessel.​
It has been determined that as the lightvessel marks only the end of the TSS and not any physical hazards to navigation, it could be removed now that the marine traffic patterns in the area are well established."​

It took 32 years to establish traffic patterns?
 

LONG_KEELER

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
3,721
Location
East Coast
Visit site
"Following the grounding of the Amoco Cadiz in 1978, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted the Off Casquets Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) in 1979; Trinity House established the Channel Lightvessel so as to clearly define the new TSS to all mariners at a time when such schemes were a relatively new maritime feature.​
As part of the continuous review of its provision of aids to navigation—and further to the discontinuation of the East Channel buoy in 2018—Trinity House has carried out extensive analysis on the requirement for the Channel Lightvessel.​
It has been determined that as the lightvessel marks only the end of the TSS and not any physical hazards to navigation, it could be removed now that the marine traffic patterns in the area are well established."​

It took 32 years to establish traffic patterns?

How could they !

Like replacing Stonehenge with a signpost to the M3. :eek:
 

Gary Fox

N/A
Joined
31 Oct 2020
Messages
2,027
Visit site
"Following the grounding of the Amoco Cadiz in 1978, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted the Off Casquets Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) in 1979; Trinity House established the Channel Lightvessel so as to clearly define the new TSS to all mariners at a time when such schemes were a relatively new maritime feature.​
As part of the continuous review of its provision of aids to navigation—and further to the discontinuation of the East Channel buoy in 2018—Trinity House has carried out extensive analysis on the requirement for the Channel Lightvessel.​
It has been determined that as the lightvessel marks only the end of the TSS and not any physical hazards to navigation, it could be removed now that the marine traffic patterns in the area are well established."​

It took 32 years to establish traffic patterns?
Maybe only recently have reliable buoys been available with the digital data collecting and sending equipment?
I totally agree the 'traffic patterns' justification seems odd. They (probably a PR intern?) didn't analyse what they were writing.
Ships' masters don't spend 30 yrs learning to follow ingrained patterns, like mice running for their local mousehole, (imagine the carnage!) they are taught to use charts and pilots and local directions etc.
Although we all know the TSS, in fact the whole concept of traffic lanes, coloured marks etc was a bit slow to catch on sometimes, it has been thoroughly established a long time now.
Anyway hopefully the old ship gets a second career as a floating clubhouse or home.
 
Top