dgadee
Well-known member
Looking at calorifiers and note that these are available in either stainless or copper. Are there any reasons for choosing one over the other?
I'm afraid that, with the price of copper now, you'd lose your bet.Since copper calorifiers are standard household equipment I can't see any reason not to buy one for a boat. My bet would be they are cheaper then stainless. We have a copper one.
I'm afraid that, with the price of copper now, you'd lose your bet.
I have a copper one and it eats an anode a year. Don't understand why as its in the 'water to be heated' side which of course is fresh and the water inside the heating coil is also 'fresh' (in the sense that its not salt) since it comes off the heat exchanger. I suppose its handling the reaction between the vitreous enamal tank and the copper coil.
The stainless ones from the same company do not have an anode so that would be an annual saving.
I have a copper one and it eats an anode a year. Don't understand why as its in the 'water to be heated' side which of course is fresh and the water inside the heating coil is also 'fresh' (in the sense that its not salt) since it comes off the heat exchanger. I suppose its handling the reaction between the vitreous enamal tank and the copper coil.
The stainless ones from the same company do not have an anode so that would be an annual saving.
Ideal for economical calorifiers, but do ensure that the standard pressure relief valve suits your water pump. We bought a 55 litre horizontal last year and the standard PRV was 3 bar. Our 43 PSI Johnson was forever blowing the valve off. Eventually, Surecal sent me a 4 BAR replacement, but NOT before I'd sent the original back. I brought this up with Matt Battle of Surecal and he said that they would change the info on their site. I've not checked the site since but assume that they must have added the question about pump pressure.
I have a copper one and it eats an anode a year. Don't understand why as its in the 'water to be heated' side which of course is fresh and the water inside the heating coil is also 'fresh' (in the sense that its not salt) since it comes off the heat exchanger. I suppose its handling the reaction between the vitreous enamal tank and the copper coil.
The stainless ones from the same company do not have an anode so that would be an annual saving.
What it doesn't show is dimensions, which I would have thought most people would be interested in.
http://www.surecal.co.uk/Product/SureCal.aspx
Open the above page and on the right hand side click on each size where it says "Click to view more information"
Simples!