Build quality modern yachts

The inescapable fact is that no mater how thick the laminate is, or how seaworthy or well built old salts think a boat is, the boat as a whole will deteriorate with time and eventually lie abandoned in a boatyard. That's what happens to old boats - all of them - with the exception of those "rescued" by doting owners with deep pockets. The seals start to give, the water gets in, the interior gets damp and old, the mould and rot gets a hold, the metal bits start to corrode and value drops - the boats get sold on to less affluent owners who are looking to go boating on a budget - owners who can't afford to maintain them properly, they bodge repairs, and the boats migrate from marina berth, to moorings, and eventually to the hard in a cheap boatyard somewhere where they lie out in all weathers, unloved and abandoned for the elements to take their toll.

If it was not that way then the laws of supply and demand should be pushing the prices of older "seaworthy" boats up, not down, there should be a healthy boat-restoration industry recycling all these bombproof hulls - showrooms with restored 80s classics looking for new owners - but the prices aren't going up, and there isn't a thriving restoration industry. The owners who value older designs are disappearing at the same rate as the boats themselves. The entire spectrum of boats in a 70s Bristows guide should be visible today, gleaming in marinas and estuaries up and down the country - but they're not - they are far outnumbered by their modern replacements. I'm not saying that there isn't a market for such boats, this forum proves there are owners willing to invest the time, effort and money to keep them afloat, but at a guess I would say that they are all older sailors, who remember the '79 Fastnet race, formed their opinions around that time, and haven't changed them since. The others I guess are younger - cash strapped newcomers who are forced into old boat ownership out of necessity - all part of a boats journey from shiny Boat Show exhibit to abandoned hulk at the back of a boatyard.

How else does a Rustler 31 end up like this ...

1600161854939.png

Go and race a First 40, or spend a day on one of the modern boats that have replaced all the ageing sailing school boats - the schools haven't curtailed their activities because they no longer have their trusty old Westerly - they still go out in all weathers - just as they always did. Charter fleets get massive abuse, and the boats survive, the ARC fleets always contain large numbers of AWBs with Bavaria, Jeanneau, Sun Odyssey etc. always to be found on the start line. Cats feature strongly too ... in the 70s they were way too dangerous 'cos they had a tendency to fall to pieces - shock horror, they were also stable when inverted - but Sea Child has spent the last 10 years circumnavigating without incident - the World ARC is full of cats from the usual AWB builders.

Interestingly, what always gets ignored by the "older is always better" brigade is the safety aspect associated with boat size - bigger is safer. There is a reason why the ARC Europe/ARC Portugal has a minimum boat length of 27ft , ARC Caribbean 1500/ARC Bahamas is 35ft and World ARC is 40ft - smaller boats will be considered but they don't get the automatic nod the bigger boats get.

Designs have changed, materials have improved, build methods have improved and are more consistent - you have to accept that the boat builders have learnt something in the last 50 years? - much as the old boat brigade lament the fact that they can't buy a new Nicholson 32 or whatever other old classic they grew up with, the fact is that in every aspect of life, including boats, the world moves on. Is it wrong to want hot and cold running water, fridges, microwaves, navigation aids, anchor windlasses, cockpit tables, transom showers, powerful engines, bathing platforms, separate cabins instead of bedding down in the saloon - and the space to put all these things. Of course not .... and that is what sells boats alongside their ability to actually sail and get their crews from A to B in one piece.

In the process of development, there will be designs, construction methods or particular companies that don't deliver - it's normal - and they pay the price. Huzar delivered some very poorly built sandwich construction, Bavaria got the keels on their Match 42 wrong, but it doesn't mean composite sandwich construction is the wrong way to go, or that bolt-on keels are inherently flawed as a concept.

Classic boats are no different to classic cars, lovely to look at, oozing nostalgia, but fundamentally out-dated - and the old adage that the crew will give up before the boat does is as true today as it ever was.

That's the last I'm going to say on the subject, when my current AWB starts to get tired, I'll trade her in for a newer one - and it will be just as much fun, and just as capable as anything that went before it. IMO you can't live your life in the past - look forward, not back - longing for a past that will never return is a recipe for resentment and unhappiness - embrace the future, celebrate the advances and laugh at the failures. Without change, life is boring.

Baggy out. ;)
 
Baggie you brought a tear to my eye , say it's not true
We love our classic money pits that need a force 6 to move:p

OK, OK ... I know I said I was done but ....

Every boat is a money pit - from the day the hull hits the water. I've nothing against old boats, or the people who love them - I grew up around them and have sailed loads - enjoyed every minute - my dad still has one from 1972 - he loves it, I couldn't put up with its shortcomings - I remember when one of my dads friends got a brand new Moody in the early 80s - or floating caravan as my dad called it at the time - I realised there was more than a hint of envy behind the comment, and that floating caravan is now a classic, because the floating caravan label belongs exclusively to current production boats - now matter which era we talk about ... "built for the charter market" is another veiled insult thrown at modern boats.

I wish owners of older boats or "classics" could be happy with their choice - every time one of these debates starts, the attitude reminds me of vegans insisting everyone should stop eating meat, atheists trying to convince those of faith that God doesn't exist, or even those with faith trying to convince everyone that they should convert to the religion in question.

Classic/New is a pointless argument - clearly both options work independent of which side of the fence you sit on - it's like arguing red is a better colour than blue.

Can you imagine what the sailing fraternity would have said back in the early 80's if a current Oceanis 46.1 had travelled back in time and appeared at the London Boat Show? Polarised wouldn't even begin to describe the reaction - but here it is, producing reviews like this in Yachting World .... go on all you old salts .... read it and tell me it wouldn't be a great boat to own.

Beneteau Oceanis 46.1 boat test – the next big thing for the world’s biggest builder? - Yachting World

Punching out into a 2m swell and 15 knots true wind, both of which increased with the threatening approach of the dark clouds, the 46.1 showed a comfortable and consistent turn of speed, heading upwind at 7.5 plus knots. Perched to windward, we enjoyed a relatively comfortable motion.

“The camber allows for a less full bow than the Jeanneau,” Pascal Conq remarked, referring to Jeanneau’s latest SO440 and SO490, which have very full forward ends and full chines. He added that this helps to keep the 46.1 from slamming upwind.

We were heeling a fair bit yet there remained a very light, but guiding amount of weather helm. A bar joining the twin rudders and textile linkage to the wheels helps provide direct helm feedback.

After a good spell sailing to weather, we then experienced the exhilarating downwind ride I described earlier. In 20 knots true with Force 6-7 gusts, we were soon easily maintaining double figures. The wake separates at around 11 knots, which happened regularly with a bit of encouragement from the short wave pattern.

These waves were coming across us slightly rather than directly following, but as the apparent wind moved forward with our speed we were able to soak down enough to enjoy some memorable short surfs, clocking between 12-14.5 knots. We weren’t actively trimming either – the main was pinned against the spreaders and the Code 0 sheet was left in the self-tailer jaws – but, boy, was it a fun ride.

Although it was an impressive display of power and speed, what really struck me was how comfortable the Oceanis 46.1 felt. The twin rudders never even hinted that they might lose grip and hand us a scary, expensive or potentially embarrassing broach. This is a reassuring asset on a family cruiser.

PS: I do realise they moaned about the finish in the stern lockers - but you've got to have something to complain about or the world would be boring ;)
 
The inescapable fact is that no mater how thick the laminate is, or how seaworthy or well built old salts think a boat is, the boat as a whole will deteriorate with time and eventually lie abandoned in a boatyard. That's what happens to old boats - all of them - with the exception of those "rescued" by doting owners with deep pockets. The seals start to give, the water gets in, the interior gets damp and old, the mould and rot gets a hold, the metal bits start to corrode and value drops - the boats get sold on to less affluent owners who are looking to go boating on a budget - owners who can't afford to maintain them properly, they bodge repairs, and the boats migrate from marina berth, to moorings, and eventually to the hard in a cheap boatyard somewhere where they lie out in all weathers, unloved and abandoned for the elements to take their toll.

If it was not that way then the laws of supply and demand should be pushing the prices of older "seaworthy" boats up, not down, there should be a healthy boat-restoration industry recycling all these bombproof hulls - showrooms with restored 80s classics looking for new owners - but the prices aren't going up, and there isn't a thriving restoration industry. The owners who value older designs are disappearing at the same rate as the boats themselves. The entire spectrum of boats in a 70s Bristows guide should be visible today, gleaming in marinas and estuaries up and down the country - but they're not - they are far outnumbered by their modern replacements. I'm not saying that there isn't a market for such boats, this forum proves there are owners willing to invest the time, effort and money to keep them afloat, but at a guess I would say that they are all older sailors, who remember the '79 Fastnet race, formed their opinions around that time, and haven't changed them since. The others I guess are younger - cash strapped newcomers who are forced into old boat ownership out of necessity - all part of a boats journey from shiny Boat Show exhibit to abandoned hulk at the back of a boatyard.

How else does a Rustler 31 end up like this ...

View attachment 98760

Go and race a First 40, or spend a day on one of the modern boats that have replaced all the ageing sailing school boats - the schools haven't curtailed their activities because they no longer have their trusty old Westerly - they still go out in all weathers - just as they always did. Charter fleets get massive abuse, and the boats survive, the ARC fleets always contain large numbers of AWBs with Bavaria, Jeanneau, Sun Odyssey etc. always to be found on the start line. Cats feature strongly too ... in the 70s they were way too dangerous 'cos they had a tendency to fall to pieces - shock horror, they were also stable when inverted - but Sea Child has spent the last 10 years circumnavigating without incident - the World ARC is full of cats from the usual AWB builders.

Interestingly, what always gets ignored by the "older is always better" brigade is the safety aspect associated with boat size - bigger is safer. There is a reason why the ARC Europe/ARC Portugal has a minimum boat length of 27ft , ARC Caribbean 1500/ARC Bahamas is 35ft and World ARC is 40ft - smaller boats will be considered but they don't get the automatic nod the bigger boats get.

Designs have changed, materials have improved, build methods have improved and are more consistent - you have to accept that the boat builders have learnt something in the last 50 years? - much as the old boat brigade lament the fact that they can't buy a new Nicholson 32 or whatever other old classic they grew up with, the fact is that in every aspect of life, including boats, the world moves on. Is it wrong to want hot and cold running water, fridges, microwaves, navigation aids, anchor windlasses, cockpit tables, transom showers, powerful engines, bathing platforms, separate cabins instead of bedding down in the saloon - and the space to put all these things. Of course not .... and that is what sells boats alongside their ability to actually sail and get their crews from A to B in one piece.

In the process of development, there will be designs, construction methods or particular companies that don't deliver - it's normal - and they pay the price. Huzar delivered some very poorly built sandwich construction, Bavaria got the keels on their Match 42 wrong, but it doesn't mean composite sandwich construction is the wrong way to go, or that bolt-on keels are inherently flawed as a concept.

Classic boats are no different to classic cars, lovely to look at, oozing nostalgia, but fundamentally out-dated - and the old adage that the crew will give up before the boat does is as true today as it ever was.

That's the last I'm going to say on the subject, when my current AWB starts to get tired, I'll trade her in for a newer one - and it will be just as much fun, and just as capable as anything that went before it. IMO you can't live your life in the past - look forward, not back - longing for a past that will never return is a recipe for resentment and unhappiness - embrace the future, celebrate the advances and laugh at the failures. Without change, life is boring.

Baggy out. ;)
Things have changed a lot. Boats now have vulnerable rudders, keels that need their bolts inspecting and keels removing for inspection if you run aground. You now have saildrives that need the rubber diaphragm changing every few years. Hulls have got thinner and less able to take an impact. Deck fittings have got smaller, masts have smaller sections and are held up by thinner wires and less of them. Lockers have got smaller, stowage has shrank, as have water tanks and fuel tanks. Beds have got bigger and more plentiful. Topsides have got taller so they have lots of windage so now you need a bow thruster. The masts have moved forward because the keels have moved forward because the stern is now heavy as its the widest part of the boat. The windage from the forward mast means the modern AWB sails around the anchor. However most owner of said AWB wont know this as they dont anchor. If this is progress, you can keep it
 
OK, OK ... I know I said I was done but ....

Every boat is a money pit - from the day the hull hits the water. I've nothing against old boats, or the people who love them - I grew up around them and have sailed loads - enjoyed every minute - my dad still has one from 1972 - he loves it, I couldn't put up with its shortcomings - I remember when one of my dads friends got a brand new Moody in the early 80s - or floating caravan as my dad called it at the time - I realised there was more than a hint of envy behind the comment, and that floating caravan is now a classic, because the floating caravan label belongs exclusively to current production boats - now matter which era we talk about ... "built for the charter market" is another veiled insult thrown at modern boats.

I wish owners of older boats or "classics" could be happy with their choice - every time one of these debates starts, the attitude reminds me of vegans insisting everyone should stop eating meat, atheists trying to convince those of faith that God doesn't exist, or even those with faith trying to convince everyone that they should convert to the religion in question.

Classic/New is a pointless argument - clearly both options work independent of which side of the fence you sit on - it's like arguing red is a better colour than blue.

Can you imagine what the sailing fraternity would have said back in the early 80's if a current Oceanis 46.1 had travelled back in time and appeared at the London Boat Show? Polarised wouldn't even begin to describe the reaction - but here it is, producing reviews like this in Yachting World .... go on all you old salts .... read it and tell me it wouldn't be a great boat to own.

Beneteau Oceanis 46.1 boat test – the next big thing for the world’s biggest builder? - Yachting World



PS: I do realise they moaned about the finish in the stern lockers - but you've got to have something to complain about or the world would be boring ;)
I'm frankly staggered at the change and the pace of change. The difference between my new 31' in 2006 and my new 40' in 2018 was like night and day. The 40' being much easier to sail and with everything to hand, despite it being bigger. And in it's day the 31' was pretty impressive. Boat design, ergonomics and engineering have come a long way

If I compare my Hanse to my new 2017 BMW......I've had far more faults with the car, far more warranty work done and it's been off the road longer than my boat has been out the water! Fair enough a car is more complicated than a boat. I've found the quality to be great. In fact, after two seasons I really can't find anything to fault
 
Things have changed a lot. Boats now have vulnerable rudders, keels that need their bolts inspecting and keels removing for inspection if you run aground. You now have saildrives that need the rubber diaphragm changing every few years. Hulls have got thinner and less able to take an impact. Deck fittings have got smaller, masts have smaller sections and are held up by thinner wires and less of them. Lockers have got smaller, stowage has shrank, as have water tanks and fuel tanks. Beds have got bigger and more plentiful. Topsides have got taller so they have lots of windage so now you need a bow thruster. The masts have moved forward because the keels have moved forward because the stern is now heavy as its the widest part of the boat. The windage from the forward mast means the modern AWB sails around the anchor. However most owner of said AWB wont know this as they dont anchor. If this is progress, you can keep it

I know misery loves company, but why can't miserable people find each other instead of trying to convert others? :unsure:
 
The inescapable fact is that no mater how thick the laminate is, or how seaworthy or well built old salts think a boat is, the boat as a whole will deteriorate with time and eventually lie abandoned in a boatyard. That's what happens to old boats - all of them - with the exception of those "rescued" by doting owners with deep pockets. The seals start to give, the water gets in, the interior gets damp and old, the mould and rot gets a hold, the metal bits start to corrode and value drops - the boats get sold on to less affluent owners who are looking to go boating on a budget - owners who can't afford to maintain them properly, they bodge repairs, and the boats migrate from marina berth, to moorings, and eventually to the hard in a cheap boatyard somewhere where they lie out in all weathers, unloved and abandoned for the elements to take their toll.

If it was not that way then the laws of supply and demand should be pushing the prices of older "seaworthy" boats up, not down, there should be a healthy boat-restoration industry recycling all these bombproof hulls - showrooms with restored 80s classics looking for new owners - but the prices aren't going up, and there isn't a thriving restoration industry. The owners who value older designs are disappearing at the same rate as the boats themselves. The entire spectrum of boats in a 70s Bristows guide should be visible today, gleaming in marinas and estuaries up and down the country - but they're not - they are far outnumbered by their modern replacements. I'm not saying that there isn't a market for such boats, this forum proves there are owners willing to invest the time, effort and money to keep them afloat, but at a guess I would say that they are all older sailors, who remember the '79 Fastnet race, formed their opinions around that time, and haven't changed them since. The others I guess are younger - cash strapped newcomers who are forced into old boat ownership out of necessity - all part of a boats journey from shiny Boat Show exhibit to abandoned hulk at the back of a boatyard.

How else does a Rustler 31 end up like this ...

View attachment 98760

Go and race a First 40, or spend a day on one of the modern boats that have replaced all the ageing sailing school boats - the schools haven't curtailed their activities because they no longer have their trusty old Westerly - they still go out in all weathers - just as they always did. Charter fleets get massive abuse, and the boats survive, the ARC fleets always contain large numbers of AWBs with Bavaria, Jeanneau, Sun Odyssey etc. always to be found on the start line. Cats feature strongly too ... in the 70s they were way too dangerous 'cos they had a tendency to fall to pieces - shock horror, they were also stable when inverted - but Sea Child has spent the last 10 years circumnavigating without incident - the World ARC is full of cats from the usual AWB builders.

Interestingly, what always gets ignored by the "older is always better" brigade is the safety aspect associated with boat size - bigger is safer. There is a reason why the ARC Europe/ARC Portugal has a minimum boat length of 27ft , ARC Caribbean 1500/ARC Bahamas is 35ft and World ARC is 40ft - smaller boats will be considered but they don't get the automatic nod the bigger boats get.

Designs have changed, materials have improved, build methods have improved and are more consistent - you have to accept that the boat builders have learnt something in the last 50 years? - much as the old boat brigade lament the fact that they can't buy a new Nicholson 32 or whatever other old classic they grew up with, the fact is that in every aspect of life, including boats, the world moves on. Is it wrong to want hot and cold running water, fridges, microwaves, navigation aids, anchor windlasses, cockpit tables, transom showers, powerful engines, bathing platforms, separate cabins instead of bedding down in the saloon - and the space to put all these things. Of course not .... and that is what sells boats alongside their ability to actually sail and get their crews from A to B in one piece.

In the process of development, there will be designs, construction methods or particular companies that don't deliver - it's normal - and they pay the price. Huzar delivered some very poorly built sandwich construction, Bavaria got the keels on their Match 42 wrong, but it doesn't mean composite sandwich construction is the wrong way to go, or that bolt-on keels are inherently flawed as a concept.

Classic boats are no different to classic cars, lovely to look at, oozing nostalgia, but fundamentally out-dated - and the old adage that the crew will give up before the boat does is as true today as it ever was.

That's the last I'm going to say on the subject, when my current AWB starts to get tired, I'll trade her in for a newer one - and it will be just as much fun, and just as capable as anything that went before it. IMO you can't live your life in the past - look forward, not back - longing for a past that will never return is a recipe for resentment and unhappiness - embrace the future, celebrate the advances and laugh at the failures. Without change, life is boring.

Baggy out. ;)
Im not sure a comparision with classic cars is valid. They may look great but with very few exceptions they are slow, dont handle or stop and the engines and suspension are agricultural in comparision with modern equivalents. The same isnt true of well maintained older boats which by now will have modern engines and deck gear and electronics and "depending on the conditions" may actually be more comfortable and sail just as well or better than a lot of modern equivalents, while obviously losing out in a lot of other respects. It therefore depends on what you are looking and whether you enjoy the maintenance side of boat ownership as much as anything. Ive just upgraded to a 36ft 1999 yacht (is that a AWB or MAB?) but the sense of acheivement of bring my 28ft 1982 Nebe back to life has been immense and having chartered a modern 30ft that felt like it was falling apart in a steep chop I know which one I would choose at this size bracket. At the same time though I could easily be tempted by a brand new 40ft plus if I could afford it!
 
Im not sure a comparision with classic cars is valid. They may look great but with very few exceptions they are slow, dont handle or stop and the engines and suspension are agricultural in comparision with modern equivalents. The same isnt true of well maintained older boats which by now will have modern engines and deck gear and electronics and "depending on the conditions" may actually be more comfortable and sail just as well or better than a lot of modern equivalents, while obviously losing out in a lot of other respects. It therefore depends on what you are looking and whether you enjoy the maintenance side of boat ownership as much as anything. Ive just upgraded to a 36ft 1999 yacht (is that a AWB or MAB?) but the sense of acheivement of bring my 28ft 1982 Nebe back to life has been immense and having chartered a modern 30ft that felt like it was falling apart in a steep chop I know which one I would choose at this size bracket. At the same time though I could easily be tempted by a brand new 40ft plus if I could afford it!

If classic yachts don`t suffer the disadvantages of classic cars when compared to their modern counterparts, then isn't that even more of an argument for a classic yacht restoration industry?

Why isn't someone buying up bomb-proof, sea-kindly hulls from the 70s/80s and refitting them - complete with encapsulated keels and skeg hung rudders?

Classic boats rely on their owners to look after them and keep them in serviceable condition - the ones that go to market however are usually being sold for a reason - unless they are picked up by a fastidious new owner, they will just continue their inevitable decline and ultimately end up in a darkened corner at the back of a boatyard somewhere.

There are well found classic yachts being sold due to health reasons, as part of an estate or because of an upgrade, but a top condition classic boat is very hard to come by because the owners love them and won't let them go until they start to become a liability.

As with every complex product, the older it is, the more likely it is to be a pandoras box of nasty surprises.
 
There are well-built boats, and badly-built boats; there are boats that are designed for marina hopping in the sun and boats that are designed for offshore cruising; there are boats that have style and boats that look like caravans; etc etc ad nauseam.

None of these features are the preserve of a particular era, and the tired old MAB vs AWB debate <shudder> inevitably polarises and exaggerates opinion.
 
If classic yachts don`t suffer the disadvantages of classic cars when compared to their modern counterparts, then isn't that even more of an argument for a classic yacht restoration industry?

Why isn't someone buying up bomb-proof, sea-kindly hulls from the 70s/80s and refitting them - complete with encapsulated keels and skeg hung rudders?

Classic boats rely on their owners to look after them and keep them in serviceable condition - the ones that go to market however are usually being sold for a reason - unless they are picked up by a fastidious new owner, they will just continue their inevitable decline and ultimately end up in a darkened corner at the back of a boatyard somewhere.

There are well found classic yachts being sold due to health reasons, as part of an estate or because of an upgrade, but a top condition classic boat is very hard to come by because the owners love them and won't let them go until they start to become a liability.

As with every complex product, the older it is, the more likely it is to be a pandoras box of nasty surprises.
Because its not commercially viable if you have to employ someone to do for you and increasingly people dont have the time either. Restoring a car is relatively easy in comparison if you can keep it at home but you still end up with something that is great for going to the pub on a sunny day but is next to useless as an everyday driver whereas a well restored yacht doesnt have this problem and once restored will deteriorate at the same rate as a new vessel assuming its fibreglass. Once done its also probably easier to keep on top of the maintenance of an older boat because you can get at everything and the only reason Ive upgraded is because the family have out grown it. Had I gone down the newer AWB route I would be doing exactly as you suggest and would upgrade before much in the way of maintenance is required but then again I probably wouldnt have the same desire to keep it either, so unlike most people it wont be one of the best two days in a boaters life when I sell her!
 
I think that many of the old boats of the '70s & '80s are absolutely hideous, with pinched sterns, pseudo-Admiral's Cup looks, clumsy masthead rigs and go-faster windows, and the sailing qualities of many to match. Today I passed a Sun 2000 at its mooring and it was really good-looking for a small boat, and with its fine entry and neat rig looked as if it sails well to match. Some larger new boats are also fine, though the styling of the ones that concentrate on accomodation can be clumsy. There are some impracticalities to do with cruising, but on the whole, I think they are mainly a decent bunch, but few of them turn heads. That would be my boat, of course.
 
This has been a most interesting thread to follow and somewhat evolved from my original question , I would not be looking at a boat from the 80s as much as it might seem like a good idea am fairly sure I don’t have the time, knowledge or funds for that

A good condition 2010 HR 342 is circa the same price as a new Beneteau 35.1

assuming one can find a good HR passing survey etc and I don’t think it’s old- a 2010 HR I’m assuming is built as well as the older ones while the design has been improved

Now the 2 boats mentioned feel totally different inside , the 35.1 has more space but the HR has a far more traditional ‘boat’ feel and has some sleeping births in the main cabin - it’s perhaps a more adapt Bluewater boat though that is not going to be its use

Ofc I could get a 5y old Beneteau for maybe half of either of the above so ... yes HR are expensive...but I like them... So are they worth the hefty premium new or are they partly being bought for nostalgia by wealthier owners
 
Ofc I could get a 5y old Beneteau for maybe half of either of the above so ... yes HR are expensive...but I like them...
So there's your answer.

For me the decision would be very straightforward, but why should you care what I (or anyone else) thinks? In many ways this is an odd choice of designs as they're so different - you must have a feel for which appeals to you more.

Financially, clearly if they're the same price now, the HR will retain more value in 5 years time. Have you specced up a new Beneteau to the same level of gear and equipment that's likely to come with the HR? It may be a useful exercise.
 
The choice between an older HR say a 40foot version and a newer model of say Bav Ben Hanse etc is a debate turning on ones personal objectives . Personally I would prefer to avoid costs such as teak deck replacement and new sails and rigging which your 42F HR might need but others happily accept higher maintenance risks and used boat feel for the benefits achieved of greater weight and cosyness of the interior. As an owner of a 5 year old boat I would be tempted by say a46 Najad if the right one was offered if it fitted plans to sail round the Baltic. If you fancy aHR and can find one to fit budget go for it -you will always find others to buy an older HR at the right price I guess even if the costs might be higher.
 
A ten year old boat will be getting to the point where the electrical bits - plotter etc. - are getting a bit long in the tooth and maybe don't support all the modern features you might want - they might well be on their way out too - the sails will be starting to lose their shape, and the canvas generally might start to look a bit worn - but there are at least 2-3 decades of use left in the boat if looked after well. The condition of the teak deck will be the big decider. Things will be starting to wear out though - even on a HR ....

At one extreme you might find a private boat that has had little use and is stored indoors during winter - the other extreme is the ex-charter boat which will have orders of magnitude more use and has got to the point where the charter company wants shot of it - it`s no longer economical to make the repairs/upgrades to keep in competitively in charter. A 5 year old ex-charter boat should only be bought if you are prepared for some major replacements and have an excellent surveyor to find any repairs or damage - the depreciation will have happened though, the price will be good, and if you can bring it back to a condition more akin to private ownership, then it will be a pretty good investment and a sound purchase.

HRs don`t tend be found on charter fleets, so less likely to show heavy wear.

The HR is a boat that will probably give you more pride of ownership, it's a respected brand and no-one will call it a "floating caravan" or a modern "soap dish" ... it sits between the traditional and modern camps, accepeted by both - if this is important to you. Having said that, not everyone appreciates what a HR is - I took a girl friend aboard a HR at a boat show - she ended up in an argument with the HR rep because the wood in the campanionway/cabin was all different types/shades - even when it was explained that they use different wood dependent on wear levels and exposure to the elements she was having none of it - she accused them of shoddy workmanship and lack of attention to detail. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: .... most embarrasing.

A 35.1 will be a fantastic family cruising platform - loads of space for entertaining, sails well, but it's an AWB so expect the derision from the traditional boat owners that comes with owning a modern design. It will be accused of having a "caravan interior", not being seaworthy, being uncomfortable in a blow, not enough handholds, unsafe cockpit, having vulnerable spade rudders, etc. etc. etc. ... all bollox, but if you can live with that then it will be a great boat - it will do what you want it to. You will lose more money on it compared to the HR, or any second hand boat, but should have a decade at least of trouble-free sailing before you need to replace any big-ticket items.

If you like HRs then with that sort of money I'd be tempted to hold out for a really nice HR36 from the early 2000s.

Just my opinion.
 
The HR is a boat that will probably give you more pride of ownership, it's a respected brand and no-one will call it a "floating caravan" or a modern "soap dish" ... it sits between the traditional and modern camps, accepeted by both - if this is important to you. Having said that, not everyone appreciates what a HR is - I took a girl friend aboard a HR at a boat show - she ended up in an argument with the HR rep because the wood in the campanionway/cabin was all different types/shades - even when it was explained that they use different wood dependent on wear levels and exposure to the elements she was having none of it - she accused them of shoddy workmanship and lack of attention to detail. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: .... most embarrasing.

The newer HR designs seem to have largely escaped the forums' notice - twin rudders, plumb bow and - heaven forbid - no chart table on the two smallest models :oops:
 
This has been a most interesting thread to follow and somewhat evolved from my original question , I would not be looking at a boat from the 80s as much as it might seem like a good idea am fairly sure I don’t have the time, knowledge or funds for that

A good condition 2010 HR 342 is circa the same price as a new Beneteau 35.1

assuming one can find a good HR passing survey etc and I don’t think it’s old- a 2010 HR I’m assuming is built as well as the older ones while the design has been improved

Now the 2 boats mentioned feel totally different inside , the 35.1 has more space but the HR has a far more traditional ‘boat’ feel and has some sleeping births in the main cabin - it’s perhaps a more adapt Bluewater boat though that is not going to be its use

Ofc I could get a 5y old Beneteau for maybe half of either of the above so ... yes HR are expensive...but I like them... So are they worth the hefty premium new or are they partly being bought for nostalgia by wealthier owners
Being from the older boat camp I have to say that certain brands do command a premium over the mass market brands, irrespective of age. From the British builders names like Oyster, Westerly, Moody, Parker always command a premium. All the Scandinavian builders like Swan, Halberg Rassey, Najad, Sweden Yachts, Malo are highly prized. People who order these yachts usually have a lot of sailing experience and know what they wanted and what they did not want in a yacht. Everything depends on what you want out of a yacht and where you intend to sail.

The link to the Oceanis 46.1 test (Beneteau Oceanis 46.1 boat test – the next big thing for the world’s biggest builder? - Yachting World) has a very good summary that could easily apply to almost any AWB.
"Stowage and tankage is moderate and in keeping with a yacht designed for coastal sailing and family holidays. By this I mean that the Oceanis 46.1 is an ideal yacht for cruising or chartering in the Med for a couple of weeks, rather than a design to suit long distance sailing or lengthy spells aboard. "

If you want to understand what is required to make the step to long distance sailing then the premium brands do have extra thoughtfull touches beyond the usual "benefits" of an AWB. Try and have a look on a Sirius yacht, a modern deck saloon yacht as they are filled with clever ideas that show why they are a premium brand. It comes in the form of clever storage places like lots of small drawers to store bits and pieces. Space to store an inflatable dinghy, fenders, warps, lockers for clothes, food or maintence items, a more traditional feel of interior and better quality materials, stronger deck fittings, etc. Last night I read that a 45+ footer had Lewmar 54 genoa winches which makes my boat massively over winched with Lewmar 43 genoa winches when comparing sail areas, but they do make winching so much easier having excess power for the size of boat.

The one factor you have not considered is the ideal size for your needs. I am pleased to see you ar not starting with a 40 footer as considered by many yachting magazines as a starter boat size. A 35 ft yacht is perfectly adequate to use for reasonably long periods. As you increase in size your cost of sailing goes up exponentially, berthing is a big annual cost, which also means things like antifouling becomes a bigger job, any replacement items like rigging or sails becomes even more expensive. Properly clean a 35 yacht and then try a 40ft yacht and you soon realise how much longer it takes. So try and stay moderate.
 
The link to the Oceanis 46.1 test (Beneteau Oceanis 46.1 boat test – the next big thing for the world’s biggest builder? - Yachting World) has a very good summary that could easily apply to almost any AWB.
"Stowage and tankage is moderate and in keeping with a yacht designed for coastal sailing and family holidays. By this I mean that the Oceanis 46.1 is an ideal yacht for cruising or chartering in the Med for a couple of weeks, rather than a design to suit long distance sailing or lengthy spells aboard. "
Hmm.. based solely on the observation that new boat reports rarely criticise anything, and the almost torturously diplomatic phrasing, I suspect they really wanted to say "stowage and tankage were utterly pathetic for a boat of this size".
 
Last edited:
Shannow:
"....A good condition 2010 HR 342 is circa the same price as a new Beneteau 35.1 ..."


If I wanted a Rassy I would not want one but a Malo instead. So to speak. You stand a some chance of finding one without a teak deck and the traditional interiors are magnificent.

I think the modern 351 boat is really in a different market, If you are skint (relatively), feel you will move on in a few years or are very sure of your sailing plans it may suit. The interior of this type of boat always look a bit shed like and the midhsip galley is a bit grim to some. Only buy if you can live with the look though, nobody wants an ugly boat. Five ft draught might lead to sailing disappointment in the long run.

.
 
Top