cherod
N/A
MOD,, do your stuff
MOD,, do your stuff
they have had 42 posts and two days to do so ,, so yes ,, MODs , where are you when you are needed ?What, and close out all the other products people have been using; but with a different and to some more attractive benefit/outcome matrix?
Really?
Just because Refueler & I have a difference of opinion is no reason to close a thread.they have had 42 posts and two days to do so ,, so yes ,, MODs , where are you when you are needed ?
they have had 42 posts and two days to do so ,, so yes ,, MODs , where are you when you are needed ?
MODs , where are you when you are needed ?
" crying " ... ????
" crying " ... ????( tbh ,, yes i did get out of it what i wanted and did not want to leave a platform for some people to fight about who knows the most ,,, but cary on if you wish )
Was "Cliff" something like this:That is a result of YBW's mistake in deleting my previous after the infamous "Cliff" events ...... the content of his post was so vile as to cause a series of measures that resulted in revamping of the Forums.
Anyways, I use Fuel Set which according to its manufacturers is designed to disperse water thereby killing most bugs and then holding them in suspension form where they can be filtered/burnt-off. Far better than forming a gloop at the bottom of the tank.
I do however use super-clean MOD compliant, FAME-Free fuel , pre-treated with Soltron by Esso. The idea was to add a little biocide such as Marine 16 if necessary, but it never has.
All anecdotal of course, but Fuel Set seems to get good reviews.
The trouble is, coming from a scientific background the information provided by Fuel Set itself seems like sheer snake oil !!
Any thoughts??
Was "Cliff" something like this:
![]()
He did appear to be a rather angry fellow.
Richard
Interesting you say about Esso .... Back in early 2000's ... Soltron guy boasted that major Oil Co's used his product and also his advise .....
From my involvement in Additives before during and after Soltron - I would think that was a local matter - not universal.
The interesting bit is that Exxon (Esso) actually had their own Additive Production and in the early days when I was manager for one of the first Injection Operative Co's - LaRoute (CFPP .. Cloud ... H2S etc) Exxon was a near monopoly until likes of Baker Hughes appeared.
Interesting, it's Fawley; that's still Esso/Exxon I think?
Refueler, if I may, what would your recommendation be for a liveaboard that would be in smaller countries where the quality of the fuel could\would be dubious? I am talking about Indo, Madagascar, Seychelles and the Caribbean. I would have a portable filter between containers/dockside pumps and my tanks.
Peter
Interesting, it's Fawley; that's still Esso/Exxon I think? My background is physical sciences, so can I ask you a question as an oil insider:
Why is the additive businesses veiled behind this voodoo/snake oil cloak? And why isn't there more decent published info?
Or am I missing something?
Interesting comment there. One of my employees ( yes, ages ago as I sold up in 2000) had worked as a tanker driver. He used to deliver for a few companies. He would go to the main storage tank at Shell Haven & fill up regardless of which fuel he was delivering for. He would then move to another set of tanks & these were supplier dependant & add the additives of that particular supplier. So at that time there was a difference. I did a very careful milleage check with one of my Bedford vans & compared Esso & a brand from another garage ( forget which one) we had accounts from both garages. It soon became clear that the Esso was delivering 2-3 miles per gallon to the other . So there is/was a difference. But the price changes cocked up a decision as to which one to change to.daft Public runs away with idea that Brand XX is crap and Brand XX is better - despite the fact they likely came from same storage tanks.