sailorman
Well-known member
Their quote for my boat was almost three times the amount I was paying, using Bishop Skinner as Broker.
I did get a 10% discount for RNLI membership with BS.
BUT what are you covered for
Their quote for my boat was almost three times the amount I was paying, using Bishop Skinner as Broker.
I did get a 10% discount for RNLI membership with BS.
I have now got a quotation from Y-Yacht and it is marginally less than I am paying at the mo.
Try pants then, they are often only marginally more expensive if at all and the solo problem is sorted.
Do it late June and there won't be any darkness to sail in. Sun sets but it doesn't gets dark north of John o'Groats.they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
Do it late June and there won't be any darkness to sail in. Sun sets but it doesn't gets dark north of John o'Groats.
BUT what are you covered for
Have to renew by the end of April. Currently with GJW (and quite pleased with them)
However, have a singlehanded, offshore trip planned for May/June.
The trip would also take me outside the usual UK waters and Brest/Elbe area. Planning to sail to either Norway or the Faroer).
Got a quote from Pants: it's several 100 quid more expensive than the renewal invitation I got from GJW (who were as yet unaware of the planned trip).
E-mailed GJW on Friday and asked them if they would be able to cover me for this trip.
Their first reply left me somewhat puzzled: they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
I now await their reply.
If GJW turn out to be unable to cover me for this trip, it looks like I'll be switching to Pants.
Have to renew by the end of April. Currently with GJW (and quite pleased with them)
However, have a singlehanded, offshore trip planned for May/June.
The trip would also take me outside the usual UK waters and Brest/Elbe area. Planning to sail to either Norway or the Faroer).
Got a quote from Pants: it's several 100 quid more expensive than the renewal invitation I got from GJW (who were as yet unaware of the planned trip).
E-mailed GJW on Friday and asked them if they would be able to cover me for this trip.
Their first reply left me somewhat puzzled: they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
I now await their reply.
If GJW turn out to be unable to cover me for this trip, it looks like I'll be switching to Pants.
Ignorance is bliss. (To be fair, only you can decide what you cover need of course)Trust me-I am covered for what I need to protect my boat.
There is plenty of knowledge - hard experience - on these forums. By way of just a little example, a poster on here (seahope) suffered a total loss when his boat sank in a solent marina about 3 years ago. A seacock had electrolysed away. Insurers got a survey and BS wrote refusing the claim in full. Marine mortgage company then demanded immediate repayment. Tough times for the boat owner. After a few hard months of putting BS (and Towergate; both were involved) right, full payout was achieved. However, the legal detail on getting that payout was, with full respect to Joe Average, well beyond Joe Average's ability (and pockets in terms of legal fees). Anyway, just saying, that's one example of how your chosen insurer actually behavedI have no knowlege how my chosen company would deal with one.
Sure it is, with most people. But the population of these forums is so big that there are several examples of people here suffering losses and insurers not paying. Sometimes insurers have been correct in not paying (though the owners have been shocked how un comprehensive their cover turned out to be). Other times the insurers have been wrong, and ultimately put right, after a lot of work. There are examples of bad behaviour among insurers and if I were voting I'd score BS and Towergate very low on the behaviour front (I'm talking big claims only; I couldn't care less about gelcoat scratches)Which is, I hope, the same with most who post on here.
Ignorance is bliss. (To be fair, only you can decide what you cover need of course)
There is plenty of knowledge - hard experience - on these forums. By way of just a little example, a poster on here (seahope) suffered a total loss when his boat sank in a solent marina about 3 years ago. A seacock had electrolysed away. Insurers got a survey and BS wrote refusing the claim in full. Marine mortgage company then demanded immediate repayment. Tough times for the boat owner. After a few hard months of putting BS (and Towergate; both were involved) right, full payout was achieved. However, the legal detail on getting that payout was, with full respect to Joe Average, well beyond Joe Average's ability (and pockets in terms of legal fees). Anyway, just saying, that's one example of how your chosen insurer actually behaved
Sure it is, with most people. But the population of these forums is so big that there are several examples of people here suffering losses and insurers not paying. Sometimes insurers have been correct in not paying (though the owners have been shocked how un comprehensive their cover turned out to be). Other times the insurers have been wrong, and ultimately put right, after a lot of work. There are examples of bad behaviour among insurers and if I were voting I'd score BS and Towergate very low on the behaviour front (I'm talking big claims only; I couldn't care less about gelcoat scratches)
Tbh, RYA and RNLI sponsorship folks aren't really insurance experts. And you have heard about it on here, at great length. I mean there has been write up on the failings of the policies in question, and of the non payout of large losses in cases where, later on and following much legal effort, the offending insurers have been proved wrong and ultimately been made to pay out in full. Sure, you wont find hundreds of threads about it because large losses/total losses are, thankfully, pretty rare. You will likewise find very few folks on here who have posted that they actually stepped up into a liferaft but that doesn't stop most of us wanting to own a good one, if you see what I mean.If BS are so poor, I am surprised that they are endorsed, through special deals, by the RYA and the RNLI.
If clients were unhappy, we would hear about it, especially on here.
I wish you well and hope never to get that PM. One of the problems with forums is you don't really know who you're talking to in most cases, so I see only now that you have a fastidious approach to maintaining your boat. I applaud you for that of course, and a bunch of things that do cause total losses of boats won't happen to you because of that. Best wishesIf it goes tits up, I will PM you so you can be the first to say "I told you so "....................................