Boat insurance renewal - I'm a bit miffed

Searush

New member
Joined
14 Oct 2006
Messages
26,779
Location
- up to my neck in it.
back2bikes.org.uk
Happened to me a few years back & I told them I needed the extra cover or I would go elsewhere. They approached the new company on my behalf & got my required solo sailing & over 12 miles offshore clauses added at no extra charge.
 

Koeketiene

Well-known member
Joined
24 Sep 2003
Messages
18,096
Location
Le Roussillon (South of France)
www.sailblogs.com
Try pants then, they are often only marginally more expensive if at all and the solo problem is sorted.

Have to renew by the end of April. Currently with GJW (and quite pleased with them)

However, have a singlehanded, offshore trip planned for May/June.
The trip would also take me outside the usual UK waters and Brest/Elbe area. Planning to sail to either Norway or the Faroer).
Got a quote from Pants: it's several 100 quid more expensive than the renewal invitation I got from GJW (who were as yet unaware of the planned trip).

E-mailed GJW on Friday and asked them if they would be able to cover me for this trip.
Their first reply left me somewhat puzzled: they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
I now await their reply.
If GJW turn out to be unable to cover me for this trip, it looks like I'll be switching to Pants.
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,913
Location
South Oxon and Littlehampton.
Visit site
BUT what are you covered for

Trust me-I am covered for what I need to protect my boat.

Pants. quote, when the small print was read, gave me little, if any, extra.

As I have never needed to make a claim-and long may that continue-I have no knowlege how my chosen company would deal with one.

Which is, I hope, the same with most who post on here.
 

Searush

New member
Joined
14 Oct 2006
Messages
26,779
Location
- up to my neck in it.
back2bikes.org.uk
GJW pulled that one on me. Now, normally for coastal cruising it isn't a problem, but obviously on passage a lack of wind or a head wind could end up with you sailing solo at night. They accepted that as not a problem, but I should not plan overnight trips on my own. That suited me.

But on a long distance passage the requirement is nonsensical. Consider switching to 3rd party only, I think that is what many long distance sailors have to do.
 

Angele

Active member
Joined
12 Dec 2008
Messages
3,427
Location
Hertfordshire
Visit site
Have to renew by the end of April. Currently with GJW (and quite pleased with them)

However, have a singlehanded, offshore trip planned for May/June.
The trip would also take me outside the usual UK waters and Brest/Elbe area. Planning to sail to either Norway or the Faroer).
Got a quote from Pants: it's several 100 quid more expensive than the renewal invitation I got from GJW (who were as yet unaware of the planned trip).

E-mailed GJW on Friday and asked them if they would be able to cover me for this trip.
Their first reply left me somewhat puzzled: they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
I now await their reply.
If GJW turn out to be unable to cover me for this trip, it looks like I'll be switching to Pants.

Oh come now. The North Sea isn't that deep. You could anchor overnight...... :p
 

Koeketiene

Well-known member
Joined
24 Sep 2003
Messages
18,096
Location
Le Roussillon (South of France)
www.sailblogs.com
Have to renew by the end of April. Currently with GJW (and quite pleased with them)

However, have a singlehanded, offshore trip planned for May/June.
The trip would also take me outside the usual UK waters and Brest/Elbe area. Planning to sail to either Norway or the Faroer).
Got a quote from Pants: it's several 100 quid more expensive than the renewal invitation I got from GJW (who were as yet unaware of the planned trip).

E-mailed GJW on Friday and asked them if they would be able to cover me for this trip.
Their first reply left me somewhat puzzled: they wanted to know if I would be sailing singlehanded in the hours of darkness.
Replied that this would be inevitable - duh.
I now await their reply.
If GJW turn out to be unable to cover me for this trip, it looks like I'll be switching to Pants.

UPDATE:

Just heard back from GJW.
They're willing to insure me for the trip.
- Premium increase of £250
- Cruising area extended to 65N in May & June
- Excess increased from £250 to £750 when sailing singlehanded

There are also a couple of endorsements I haven't yet had time to read.
Will compare details of the GJW and Pants policies and endorsements tomorrow.

As GJW have really been good for us when we had a claim my first instinct is to stick with them (better the devil you know...)
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,935
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
Trust me-I am covered for what I need to protect my boat.
Ignorance is bliss. (To be fair, only you can decide what you cover need of course)

I have no knowlege how my chosen company would deal with one.
There is plenty of knowledge - hard experience - on these forums. By way of just a little example, a poster on here (seahope) suffered a total loss when his boat sank in a solent marina about 3 years ago. A seacock had electrolysed away. Insurers got a survey and BS wrote refusing the claim in full. Marine mortgage company then demanded immediate repayment. Tough times for the boat owner. After a few hard months of putting BS (and Towergate; both were involved) right, full payout was achieved. However, the legal detail on getting that payout was, with full respect to Joe Average, well beyond Joe Average's ability (and pockets in terms of legal fees). Anyway, just saying, that's one example of how your chosen insurer actually behaved

Which is, I hope, the same with most who post on here.
Sure it is, with most people. But the population of these forums is so big that there are several examples of people here suffering losses and insurers not paying. Sometimes insurers have been correct in not paying (though the owners have been shocked how un comprehensive their cover turned out to be). Other times the insurers have been wrong, and ultimately put right, after a lot of work. There are examples of bad behaviour among insurers and if I were voting I'd score BS and Towergate very low on the behaviour front (I'm talking big claims only; I couldn't care less about gelcoat scratches)
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,913
Location
South Oxon and Littlehampton.
Visit site
Ignorance is bliss. (To be fair, only you can decide what you cover need of course)


There is plenty of knowledge - hard experience - on these forums. By way of just a little example, a poster on here (seahope) suffered a total loss when his boat sank in a solent marina about 3 years ago. A seacock had electrolysed away. Insurers got a survey and BS wrote refusing the claim in full. Marine mortgage company then demanded immediate repayment. Tough times for the boat owner. After a few hard months of putting BS (and Towergate; both were involved) right, full payout was achieved. However, the legal detail on getting that payout was, with full respect to Joe Average, well beyond Joe Average's ability (and pockets in terms of legal fees). Anyway, just saying, that's one example of how your chosen insurer actually behaved


Sure it is, with most people. But the population of these forums is so big that there are several examples of people here suffering losses and insurers not paying. Sometimes insurers have been correct in not paying (though the owners have been shocked how un comprehensive their cover turned out to be). Other times the insurers have been wrong, and ultimately put right, after a lot of work. There are examples of bad behaviour among insurers and if I were voting I'd score BS and Towergate very low on the behaviour front (I'm talking big claims only; I couldn't care less about gelcoat scratches)

Thanks for the heads up.

I am not ignorant-even blissfully so-and, after a lifetime of involvement with insurance companies involving vehicles-even acting as a broker for a major motorcycle insurer, know my way around.

Let us say I am streetwise, and know how to present information, and in what quantities.

If BS are so poor, I am surprised that they are endorsed, through special deals, by the RYA and the RNLI.

If clients were unhappy, we would hear about it, especially on here.

First Mate and I are very fortunate to own a high quality yacht, one we never imagined we would ever aspire to.

We maintain her very well-50 years as a professional mechanic plus 45 years owning boats allows me to be sure that what is needed is done. If I cant do it, an expert will.

Never a claim in all that time-although it has been a close call once or twice.

Been away from our boat for three months.

She is visited twice a week by a very experienced guy who lives nearby and keeps his boat in the same marina. He logs every visit and, like us, is fastidious.

Cant wait to get back to her-we have been sailing a 22 foot lift keel cruiser here in Spain- and prepare her for the coming season.

I am happy with my situation.

My broker gives me any information I ask for when I need it, I fulfill my end of the bargain by keeping the vessel in good nick and as safe as I can manage, plus informing them IN FULL of any changes or additions we make.

So far it has worked out well. I pay a realistic premium, they get a dedicated owner who keeps the boat up.

If it goes tits up, I will PM you so you can be the first to say "I told you so "....................................
 

jfm

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
23,935
Location
Jersey/Antibes
Visit site
If BS are so poor, I am surprised that they are endorsed, through special deals, by the RYA and the RNLI.

If clients were unhappy, we would hear about it, especially on here.
Tbh, RYA and RNLI sponsorship folks aren't really insurance experts. And you have heard about it on here, at great length. I mean there has been write up on the failings of the policies in question, and of the non payout of large losses in cases where, later on and following much legal effort, the offending insurers have been proved wrong and ultimately been made to pay out in full. Sure, you wont find hundreds of threads about it because large losses/total losses are, thankfully, pretty rare. You will likewise find very few folks on here who have posted that they actually stepped up into a liferaft but that doesn't stop most of us wanting to own a good one, if you see what I mean.


If it goes tits up, I will PM you so you can be the first to say "I told you so "....................................
I wish you well and hope never to get that PM. One of the problems with forums is you don't really know who you're talking to in most cases, so I see only now that you have a fastidious approach to maintaining your boat. I applaud you for that of course, and a bunch of things that do cause total losses of boats won't happen to you because of that. Best wishes :D
 
Last edited:
Top