geem
Well-Known Member
We have three seperate independant bilge pumps with float switches. Together they will move 19,000 litres an hour. Enough to manage a 2" hole at 1m below the surface. Workes for me
We have three seperate independant bilge pumps with float switches. Together they will move 19,000 litres an hour. Enough to manage a 2" hole at 1m below the surface. Workes for me
We have three seperate independant bilge pumps with float switches. Together they will move 19,000 litres an hour. Enough to manage a 2" hole at 1m below the surface. Workes for me
My boat has three semi-watertight compartments; the engine room, the main cabin, and the forward cabin. Each will be equipped with its own Gulper 320 pump with independent sensors. House battery bank is nearly 1kAh, and she's got shore power connected most of the time. I plan to fit two 300W solar panels as well, which should keep the battery bank topped up when shore power isn't available. I also have a security system on board which will SMS and email me when water is detected, and the pump status and history can be monitored remotely. Should I see indications that a significant leak is occurring I can probably make my way to where she's moored in less time than the battery bank can keep the pumps running - or at least get a friend or marina staff to take a look. I fail to see why some people here are so against this concept - this is my home we're talking about, and all my belongings are on board, why shouldn't I take every reasonable precaution against flooding?
The bilge pump outputs are corrected for zero head. The zero head rated output of pumps is 29,000 litres per hour. We have 900 amp hours of domestic battery capacity and lots of solar and wind. Since we live onboard the boat isnt left unattended during the night. During the day we put in lots of amps from wind and solar being in the Caribbean. We dont have a great fear of sinking from a failed skin fitting. If we were leaving our boat on a mooring all seacocks would be switched off so reducing the risk of a failire to some extentFor how long before your batteries die ...... ? Six hours, twelve hours - very unlikely to be more than a day.
And have you calculated that at manufacturer-spec ie zero head or the actual pump outlet head(s)?
I'm not saying that effective and powerful bilge pumps are wrong, just that the chance of any auto bilge pump setup "saving" an unattended boat are slim, and rely on you ariving on board in time to stop the inflow before your batteries are flat.
Given your circumstances I agree you need to take far more precautions than most but am surprised you chose such a low capacity pump.
If your main worry is water ingress when you are not on board, what is the worst case fault? Obviously not hull damage due to impact. Skin fitting or propshaft seal?
They're one of the highest capacity diaphragm type pumps, which has a couple of important benefits: they can run dry for extended periods of time, they self prime up to several metres which allows me to mount the pump in a convenient location, and they don't clog. Another benefit is that this is the same type of pump I'm fitting for the shower, so I only need to keep one set of spare parts.
Why not impact damage? Plenty of idiots around on the inland waterways, and it's a riveted steel hull from the 1920s, only partially overplated. I can imagine many other scenarios which may cause flooding, even some more unusual ones like a freshwater tank leak (I have 650L on board), or burglars leaving a hatch open, or hidden rust damage that may cause a sudden catastrophic failure somewhere below the waterline. Interestingly, the previous owner did not have any bilge pump of any kind fitted, but then the bilges were also severely rusted - something which has costed thousands of pounds to rectify. With all the work that's been carried out to get her back into (ship) shape, I'm not taking any chances.
1:100 failure, becomes 1:10,000. You could in theory add a third switch to get 1:1,000,000.If both switches are 99% reliable do you get 99.99% reliability. Not sure, but certainly much much better.
But as the 'off' switch is the 'on' switch that breaks the on reliability, although not as badly as you expect -- it becomes 2:100 (i.e.1:50) but that's a big jump from 1:1,000.But to achieve the reliability of turning off will be a bit more tricky. Perhaps switches in series so 2 must operate to get pump to work so increasing chances of the pump switching off.
Thanks for explanation. Yout strategy sounds pretty watertight to me![]()
For the failure to switch off, I'd be tempted to work out if I had a float switch activated when there are 5cm of water in an area 4m x 0.75m = 150,000cm3 so 150 litres. If my pump should be pumping 900litres/hr I'd want to have an alarm sound if the pump has been running more than 10 minutes. That would be the time needed to pump out the pumpable area from the level the pump switched on to empty... so either the pump isn't pumping right, or the switch is jammed or there is more water coming in. Any of those three you probably want to know about it! If getting someone to investigate that isn't an option, you'd either then want to have the ability to remotely switch the pump off and have sensor states remotely... or even more complex you need to process the data in something like an arduino and have it decide if it should over ride the sensor. Personally I doubt an Aruino can do that reliably. Your knowledge will be useful. Its 5pm after a day of gales and heavy rain. The pump is running lots. You could be there in an hour. You probably leave it running and head up to see whats going on. On another day, Its a flat calm day. Nothing would make you think the boat is likely to have sprung a leak. You've had a couple of occasions recently with a sticky switch. You can't be there for 24 hours - and you know your battery will die. You may as well switch off for a bit and maybe have a higher sensor that would alarm if things deteriorated. ... How do you get a computer chip to take into account the weather, the when can someone be there etc.
If you are able to find a 100% reliable switch, you then need to find a 100% reliable pump to go with it. In practise, there is no completely reliable electrical equipment in the proximity of salt water.
For some years I have been using fill switches from automatic washing machines. If you don't have a redundant washing machine about, there are plenty at recycling centres. These are operated by rising water pressurising a chamber at the bottom of the bilge.
Many bilge pumps fail due to clogging with debris.
The switch I have selected is certified for "use as redundant alarm in classified applications" in media such as fuel, acetone and hydrochloric acid. It is IP68 rated and has a 25 mA maximum current consumption. At a list price of £230 it also costs a lot more than any bilge sensor I've seen - but I'm pretty good at not paying list pricesNone of this means it will never fail of course, but it should be at least as reliable as any dedicated bilge switch is likely to be.
Clever idea! I've found one or two bilge switches which operate on this principle, so it isn't entirely new, but I like the recycling![]()
The Whale Gulper 320 is a diaphragm pump, selected specifically because it does not clog.
Make that "does not easily clog"![]()

Make that "is less likely to clog than any other bilge pump type available to mere mortals".
Probably. They do clog though. They can also suffer fouled valves which stop them working, as will clogged pipes.
You will still be well advised to fit strainers.
The switch I have selected is certified for "use as redundant alarm in classified applications" in media such as fuel, acetone and hydrochloric acid. It is IP68 rated and has a 25 mA maximum current consumption. At a list price of £230 it also costs a lot more than any bilge sensor I've seen - but I'm pretty good at not paying list pricesNone of this means it will never fail of course, but it should be at least as reliable as any dedicated bilge switch is likely to be.