jhr
Well-Known Member
Oh dear, the SHT will not be pleased as your observation of the eel grass spread, is opposite to theirs.
Not to worry. Boathook's observations are "anecdotal", so they don't count.....
Oh dear, the SHT will not be pleased as your observation of the eel grass spread, is opposite to theirs.
I am a no nothin agriculturalist
but real grass exists because of soil disturbance - its an early coloniser
grazing animals give it a bad time and its is the first to grow
take away the soil disturbance and the grass gets replaced by other plants
maybe the seagrass is there because of the anchors
but we don't know - and it seems neither do the SHT
Dylan
Dylan, the ploughing effect of anchors helping the sea grass to spread was one of the first theorise put up on here two years ago, when the SHT first posted here. But they (Mrs Steve Trellis of North Wales) said it was impossible, but when asked to produce some botanical qualifications, the insults started.
You can search for their earlier utterances.
sorry that is the price of coming late to a thread
but I thought it was time I started following this one
d
Oh dear, the SHT will not be pleased as your observation of the eel grass spread, is opposite to theirs.
Apparently wartime aerial photos also show the extent of eel grass to be much less than today.
It makes ense to me that eel grass is spread by breaking bits off it with an anchor which then settle & root, colonising somewhere else,
I still don't understand why -- if anchoring is really so destructive to the habitat of seahorses -- why do the seahorses choose to live (and apparently thrive) in one of the most popular anchorages on the south coast?
And if they can survive such horrifically damaging activity, why aren't the similar but less popular bays over-run with the things?
The unique feature about Studland is that you can park your car,