Poignard
Well-Known Member
What are promotion prospects in the navy for people who get convicted of misnavigation, or whatever the charge is?
They ought to be good. People who don't take risks aren't much use commanding warships, or anything else.
What are promotion prospects in the navy for people who get convicted of misnavigation, or whatever the charge is?
What are promotion prospects in the navy for people who get convicted of misnavigation, or whatever the charge is?
I believe he's a former Royal Navy officer. Probably cos he sank a battleship in his previous career![]()
They ought to be good. People who don't take risks aren't much use commanding warships, or anything else.
Oh fair point, I'd missed that! Mind you, same could apply to magistrates!
I believe he's a former Royal Navy officer. Probably cos he sank a battleship in his previous career![]()
Interestingly towards the bottom of this page: http://www.yachtingmonthly.com/magazine/50123/summer-2012 there is a reference to:
Sailing a Bavaria 36 from Port Solent
District judge Anthony Callaway shows Yachting Monthly round his yacht and home waters
![]()
It's a single district judge, Anthony Calloway, in the magistrates court.
Interestingly towards the bottom of this page: http://www.yachtingmonthly.com/magazine/50123/summer-2012 there is a reference to:
Sailing a Bavaria 36 from Port Solent
District judge Anthony Callaway shows Yachting Monthly round his yacht and home waters
![]()
Did he? Or does your "Rolls Eyes Smiley" mean that you don't know?
oo ... so somebody who should be in the know then ...
I wonder if he was allocated this case especially?
Wow, good find! One would hope that neither side will be able to bamboozle him with nautical nonsense then!
I wonder if he was allocated this case especially?
... perhaps he is one of us.
... I doubt the HM Court Service is sufficiently organised to act in such a sensible manner.
The real problem is likely to be that the defense and prosecuting counsels may not be au fait with seamanship issues.
Chapter and verse:
11.(1). In this byelaw -
"the Precautionary Area” means the main navigable channel which lies between an imaginary line drawn between Prince Consort and South Bramble Buoys and an imaginary line drawn between Black Jack and Hook Buoys;
"Moving Prohibited Zone’’ means an area extending 1000 metres ahead and 100 metres either side of any vessel of over 150 metres length overall while it is navigating within the Precautionary Area.
Now, I don't say that it's necessarily relevant to this case, but in general I'd suggest this thread highlights a deficiency in the definition. Clearly the MPZ does not come into existence until a westbound ship's bow nearly due North of Prince Consort, at which time the MPZ instantly appears, stretching 1km westward.
The powers that be have probably thought about this before and decided that retaining the simplicity of the current wording outweighs any need to fix this (?)
One approach might be for the "Moving Zone" to be defined at all times for vessels approaching the area, but it isn't always Prohibited. Any part of the Moving Zone lying within the Precautionary Area would be Prohibited, as well as the entire Moving Zone being Prohibited while the vessel is within the Precautionary Zone, as now.
I'd expect whoever is bringing the prosecution to make sure that they chose a suitably experienced barrister. Same with the accused.
No doubt experienced in the relevant law - but seamanship?