Atalanta of Chester/Hanne Knutsen trial

What are promotion prospects in the navy for people who get convicted of misnavigation, or whatever the charge is?

I understand he is now "ex-navy" (or retired, or whatever the official term is), although still a reservist. "Jumped ship" metaphorically, unlike his crewmember who did it for real. :D
 
Last edited:
Oh fair point, I'd missed that! Mind you, same could apply to magistrates!

It's a single district judge, Anthony Calloway, in the magistrates court.

Interestingly towards the bottom of this page: http://www.yachtingmonthly.com/magazine/50123/summer-2012 there is a reference to:

Sailing a Bavaria 36 from Port Solent

District judge Anthony Callaway shows Yachting Monthly round his yacht and home waters


and more here: http://www.yachtingmonthly.com/news/532924/yachting-monthly-helps-rescue-mob

I wonder if he is a member of the forum

;)
 
Last edited:
It's a single district judge, Anthony Calloway, in the magistrates court.

Interestingly towards the bottom of this page: http://www.yachtingmonthly.com/magazine/50123/summer-2012 there is a reference to:

Sailing a Bavaria 36 from Port Solent

District judge Anthony Callaway shows Yachting Monthly round his yacht and home waters


;)

Wow, good find! One would hope that neither side will be able to bamboozle him with nautical nonsense then!

I wonder if he was allocated this case especially?
 
I would like to say this behaviour is surprising from an ex RN officer but, having spent five years working next to them, sadly its not.
I have no idea why he thinks he can get away with this and his naval training should have alerted him to the fact that he is about to get hammered in court. Sailing out of Southampton on big ships I witnessed quite a few near misses and the pilots are well used to this malarky. Having your barrister question the senior pilots knowledge of the area is surely a loosing strategy? I presume the defendant is one of the silver spoon short commission boys who's only interest in the navy is being able to say he upheld family tradition and the ability to add it to his CV before his chosen job in the City.
 
... perhaps he is one of us. :cool:



... I doubt the HM Court Service is sufficiently organised to act in such a sensible manner.

If he is, he'd disqualify himself if he read this thread, or the others on the same topic! He is only allowed to take into consideration the facts as presented in court, and if it was shown that he'd read opinions beyond those presented in court, he'd be off the case PDQ.

The real problem is likely to be that the defense and prosecuting counsels may not be au fait with seamanship issues.
 
Last edited:
Chapter and verse:
11.(1). In this byelaw -
"the Precautionary Area” means the main navigable channel which lies between an imaginary line drawn between Prince Consort and South Bramble Buoys and an imaginary line drawn between Black Jack and Hook Buoys;
"Moving Prohibited Zone’’ means an area extending 1000 metres ahead and 100 metres either side of any vessel of over 150 metres length overall while it is navigating within the Precautionary Area.


Now, I don't say that it's necessarily relevant to this case, but in general I'd suggest this thread highlights a deficiency in the definition. Clearly the MPZ does not come into existence until a westbound ship's bow nearly due North of Prince Consort, at which time the MPZ instantly appears, stretching 1km westward.

The powers that be have probably thought about this before and decided that retaining the simplicity of the current wording outweighs any need to fix this (?)

One approach might be for the "Moving Zone" to be defined at all times for vessels approaching the area, but it isn't always Prohibited. Any part of the Moving Zone lying within the Precautionary Area would be Prohibited, as well as the entire Moving Zone being Prohibited while the vessel is within the Precautionary Zone, as now.

Basically therefore, don't put yourself in a position where you will end up within the ship's MPZ when she enters the AoC. Seems pretty clear to me as it is.
 
It's really a bit strange that whether a GPS on the yacht was working or not came up in court - clear visibility in a very congested Solent.
 
Barristers are more likely than most people to be able to afford to run a luxury yacht. I wonder if the proportion that actually do so is more or less than that in the population as a whole?
 
Top