Are boats more prone to Osmosis in freshwater

aquaplane

Active member
Joined
16 Sep 2006
Messages
2,679
Location
West Yorkshire
www.utilitywarehouse.co.uk
If it was prone to osmosis, the osmosis would happen faster because the fresh water would be trying harder to dilute the blister than salt water. Fresh water wouldn't cause the blister to form initially any worse than sea water.
 

jwilson

Well-known member
Joined
22 Jul 2006
Messages
6,049
Visit site
In general, yes, freshwater worse than seawater, and the warmer the water the more likely 'osmosis' is. However some boats get blisters and some just don't seem to. Looked at a 30+ year old boat at the weekend and it had a very clean hull and very low hull moisture meter readings - virtually new boat levels, despite 30+ years of normal UK usage.
 

coopec

N/A
Joined
23 Nov 2013
Messages
5,216
Visit site
I agree that osmosis is more likely when the yacht has spent most of its' life in fresh water: I don't think any knowledgeable person would dispute that. (There are a lot of threads where that opinion is supported)

You might find this article helpful.

http://www.yachtsnet.co.uk/osmosis.htm
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
39,549
Location
Essex
Visit site
Basically the denser the water is the less likely to suffer from the same degree of osmosis over a given time. Hence warm freshwater (low density) more risky than cold seawater (higher density).
John Lilley
That doesn't seem to tally with my 60yr old chemistry memories. I thought that osmotic pressure was dependant upon the difference in molecular concentration of solutes each side of a membrane. I assumed that the effect of higher temperature was just to speed up the process, as with most chemical and physical processes.
 

eilerts

Member
Joined
26 Apr 2016
Messages
141
Location
Trondheim, Norway
Visit site
The boat phenomenon "osmosis" is a result of several coupled processes with different time frame. The very first process is diffusion of water molecules into the initial dry GRP hull, which starts when the boat is launched for the first time. This goes on until the GRP is saturated. The main driving force is the undersaturation of the hull. The small difference in water concentration between seawater and freshwater makes little difference.

As water concentration rises in the GRP a slow chemical reaction starts called hydrolysis. This breaks down polyester to smaller water soluble molecules. The speed of this process is dependent on water content in the GRP, temperature, and materials quality. The saltness of the water outside the hull is not relevant here, but freshwater may be warmer in general, and that can make a difference.

As the amount of water soluble components enriches, another process starts - osmosis (in the chemical sense). It is this process that builds the blisters. It works as long as the concentration of water solubles are greater inside the GRP than outside. The driving force is this difference in concentration. Here salt or fresh water makes a big difference. This is because the critical level for start up for this process is lower in freshwater and is reached earlier. The blister growth is also stronger as it takes more water to dilute the stuff inside the GRP to the outside level.
I should mention that in this process it does not matter if dissolved stuff outside is salt and something else inside the blisters.

The two first processes builds the fundament for the third. If the boat has been in freshwater, but is fee of blisters it may not be worse than a similar boat that has been in salt water. A blisterfree boat that has been in saltwater may soon develop blisters when moved to freshwater, if its level of water soluble hydrolysis products is just below the level of salt in seawater.

My answer will be, it is more likely to have osmosis, but not necessarily more likely to get it.

Jan
 
Last edited:
Top