Its called Mickey Mouse construction in my view.
Ran aground, tore the keel off, and lying in 5 feet of water?How did this happen?
Also here http://www.sailfastchicago.com/site/category/boating-disasters/page/2/
Keel lost after repeated pounding in shallow water on Lake Michigan, boat sank but keel and hull recovered later.
I'd expect something to break after such treatment.It's not indicative of any particular weakness in this case.
"Keel-bolt pattern on a stock First 40.7, as seen from inside. Note that the keel’s attachment points are not tied directly into the structural bilge grid. Also, this is an exceptionally shallow bilge!"
It makes me glad that my Dehler (like all of them)
Most production boats are constructed this way - with the keel bolted through the solid laminate rather than the subframe. Charlie (the author of the sail piece) should know this, as it's the norm rather than the exception. Millions of boats are constructed this way. What you will probably find is that at the keel point the subframe is laminated in place and the bolts are on top of this lamination.
Ps I don't think Dehler use the steel subframe any more. Could be wrong, I'm on a train so don't have the PDF brochures with me.
Most production boats are constructed this way - with the keel bolted through the solid laminate rather than the subframe. Charlie (the author of the sail piece) should know this, as it's the norm rather than the exception. Millions of boats are constructed this way. What you will probably find is that at the keel point the subframe is laminated in place and the bolts are on top of this lamination.
Ps I don't think Dehler use the steel subframe any more. Could be wrong, I'm on a train so don't have the PDF brochures with me.
Most production boats are constructed this way - with the keel bolted through the solid laminate rather than the subframe. Charlie (the author of the sail piece) should know this, as it's the norm rather than the exception. Millions of boats are constructed this way. What you will probably find is that at the keel point the subframe is laminated in place and the bolts are on top of this lamination.
Ps I don't think Dehler use the steel subframe any more. Could be wrong, I'm on a train so don't have the PDF brochures with me.
Snooks' and 30boat, indeed the bolts will be taken through the structural interior moulding and hull effectively clamping the two together in this vintage of build, earlier models such as the 1980s First 405 had the bolts going through just the hull and not the interior moulding but the hulls were then very much thicker then than they are now.
I believe that you are both mistaken in your statement regarding the matter of the interior being laminated to the hull on this particular brand of vessel and many other production boats. On this type of boat the interior moulding and structural floors are bonded to the hull with a bonding paste, somewhat akin to car body filler. This bonding material is very brittle. Some builders use the more expensive, massively stronger and flexible Plexus type materials but I believe they are in the minority. See the upper of Snooks' photos where you can clearly see two pieces of the brittle material that have broken away.
A light grounding at say 2 to 3 knots will flex the hull and liner, the rear of the keel kicks up and the front down with the result that the brittle bonding paste cracks therefore losing the structural bond between the hull and the liner. The flexible laminate usually returns to its original shape. Over time the continuous flexing movements around the damaged area extend the cracks in the bonding paste radially outward and, eventually this generally extends out as far as the back of the berths and often as far aft as the aft cabin and engine beds.
Bear in mind that this can happen without any significant outwardly visible signs. The first indication is usually, but not always, some crazing of gel coat on the floors and then as the weakness progresses by creaking and groaning and squeaking woodwork indicating that the boat is flexing. A gap can appear at the leading or aft edge of the keel to hull joint but this is not always the case particularly in the models that have a full interior liner. The boat can sag around the keel when placed on the hard and supported by the keel.
In Snooks' photos you can see what appears to be a vertical crack in the floor and de-lamination horizontally below the stainless support, to me this indicates that there will probably be much more extensive damage. I suspect that the boat in Snooks' photos has already been repaired rather poorly by the fact that brush marks in the flowcoat in the bilge area are clearly visible. Out of the factory this area would be a smooth gelcoat finish as it would be the outer face of the moulding and a a quality repairer would seek to obtain the same finish as the factory. See lower pic for original finish.
View attachment 42911
View attachment 42910
View attachment 42909
This total covering of the hull by the liner as shown in the lower pic also can hinder the locating of the source of a leak or damage in that area as neither the keel to hull joint nor the structural interior moulding to hull joint are visible to inspect. Water from a leak can run inside the liner and appear at a point nowhere near the source of the leak.
I am not bashing this type of boat as I have owned a number myself and been perfectly happy with them but I do think that many owners are blissfully unaware of the potential for such problems and perhaps it would be advantageous if they were made aware so that they can keep a look out for any potential failure.
That said the constant income I have derived over the years repairing such damage has been most welcome so I wouldn't want people to be too careful.