iapetus
Active Member
I believe this is the video I saw
The guy was reversing at 3000 RPM... :encouragement:
The typical planning boat does 15-20 knots then, no wonder why the Rocna wouldn't reset.
I believe this is the video I saw
With the Rocna style you’re supposed to head into the wind and let out > 5:1 don’t actively try to set the anchor until it’s at least 3:1 and then only little revs to get the boat moving. Don’t give the the anchor a good pull for at least a couple of hours while the anchor sets itself in.
That’s what we do now based on the manufactures advice....I think that these anchors need less active setting than traditional non rolling spades.
The guy was reversing at 3000 RPM... :encouragement:
The typical planning boat does 15-20 knots then, no wonder why the Rocna wouldn't reset.
If the Rocna bits about a couple of hours to set before you can put on real tension are true then that's decided me against a Rocna when I upgrade.
If I'm anchoring around dusk I want to be sure the ground is good enough to anchor in and sleep through a squall, and have time to move if the ground is wrong and the anchor doesn't set when a significant bit of tension (to mimic the squall) is put onto it. So a 5 second set is needed not a 2 hour one. I can't really believe Rocnas are that hopeless.
I can certainly concur with what the testing of the Bruce and Delta anchors demonstrated in that video. Ferrettis always come with Bruce anchors fitted as standard so we have had quite a lot of experience with them, both the original sizes fitted and heavier sizes which I retrofitted. They set and held very well in clay but in sand they would often appear to set but then skip so that you were never sure if they were set. Then in weedy bottoms they were downright useless because they just couldnt get a bite. The Delta was a better all round anchor IMHO but as the video suggests it doesnt have enough blade area to hold in soft sand. We had a couple of scary experiences in windy conditions when the Delta appeared to hold and then started dragging after an hour or two and that was with the big 60kg Delta. We swapped that for a 55kg Rocna and as I say, its never failed to set and never dragged in 2 seasons. We have had some windy nights at anchor in the last 2 seasons although, to be fair, we've never had to anchor in a gale so until that happens the jury is still slightly out. The only downside of the Rocna is that it is an ugly old piece of scaffolding which certainly wont impress your neighbours in the marina and in our case, the Rocna is so wide that it sometimes chafes the bow linesThis is the one that sold it for me...
I can certainly concur with what the testing of the Bruce and Delta anchors demonstrated in that video....... They set and held very well in clay but in sand they would often appear to set but then skip so that you were never sure if they were set.
What do you mean by fail? Structural failure or dragging? Rocna certainly did go through a well publicised period when a few of their products failed structurally after production was moved to China but AFAIK that is now in the past. Look I can only report my own experience and I'm the first to admit that I'm no expert on anchors or anchoringYet paradoxically when I have seen anchor failure, it has been with a new age anchor. (Delta's in these instances)
You mean drag OR bend, dontcha?Drag and bend
I see what you mean but with enough rode you would be fine to let the prevailing condition do the work for you. It’s tempting to give it a good tug but far better to let it work it’s way in over time. It does not seem to drag during the setting process as long as the chain is deployed at at least 5:1
But that is so unsafe as a technique (well it will fail sometimes) - for me the purpose of digging in is to test that the ground will hold you in an overnight squall or if one hits when you are ashore. Examples when we have set firmly in slow astern but dragged as soon as a little more throttle was applied include a very thick weedy bottom, catching a large bin bag, and sand six inches deep over flat smooth rock.
If we had let nature take its course then a blow later would sent us wandering.
Thanks for the report. This is a risk.
In my case the float and rope are fairly small and I don't think it has much impact on the anchor setting even if caught underneath, but your experience is interesting. If you free fall the anchor, attaching the float onto a weak clip on the pulpit (such as a clothes peg) ensures the float drops second so it remains above the anchor.
This is the idea, although the wide angle of the camera lens makes the float look larger. It is only about one and half inches long:
![]()
We use one of these when there is danger of rocks:-
https://www.swi-tec.us/ankerundbojen/30-self-adjusting-anchor-buoy.html
Recovering is a bit of a faf so I've made a loop of floating rope so that it can easily be picked up with a boat hook.
This is their amusing little promotion video
You can just see it floating in front of us in this pic
![]()
Ah yes, that would certainly affect the anchor if caught undeneath.
sorry noelex, mine is 10CM in dia!!!
Great pic
Mind you none of that explains something I see very often in South of France, which is a boat laying out chain by going FORWARDS...... I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve seen that in St Tropez usually followed by an almost instant departure for the nearest beach restaurant ! I would guess the forward movement stops the chain piling up on top of the anchor, then the time necessary for the Boat to fall back and tension the chain correctly allows for the argument that some time is best for the anchor to correctly set, and I suppose they get away with it because it’s a very soft sandy bottom and provided they lay out enough chain (5 or even 6x) and in relatively shallow water (3 m) then all ends well.
Mind you none of that explains something I see very often in South of France, which is a boat laying out chain by going FORWARDS......