TiggerToo
Well-Known Member
I was looking at the Amels. They have a great reputation - at least the more recent ones. What does the panel think of the "older" offerings, say 1980's?
I was looking at the Amels. They have a great reputation - at least the more recent ones. What does the panel think of the "older" offerings, say 1980's?
Well maintained, they are brilliant.
I have been aboard a couple of Sharkis (46ft) which have been immaculate.
A mate is half way to Barbados on his Sharki right now.
If I had my time over again I would buy one on a heartbeat.
If you are serious and have questions I can put you in touch with my mate when he gets back.
They may be very good boats but to me they are just pig ugly.
They may be very good boats but to me they are just pig ugly.
Correction : the Sharki is 40' and its replacement, the Santorin is 46'. The Maramu (not to be confused with the Super Maramu (53')) which is like a larger Sharki is 44'.
The logic for the Santorin was that each cabin should have its own en suite heads and the lazarette was made bigger for more storage space.
Sharki would be my choice for my next boat if ever I sell this house.... :mad-new: but preferably a late model one because there was a lot of evolution over the boat's production period.
The following blog (if you can read French) is very informative about the Sharki.
http://dougle.heoblog.com/index.php?post/2010/09/30/Le-projet-le-choix-du-bateau#main
They do a detailed analysis of the global performance. One of the points that they make is that some modern boats will get you there a bit quicker but you, you will arrive comfortably and relaxed. They also recounted a transatlantic where they left at the same time as a J boat. They arrived first because of the Sharki's ability to plough through adverse weather whereas the lighter J boat was held up by slamming into head seas.
Also :
http://www.ybw.com/forums/showthread.php?457289-Trident-Warrior-38-40
See my post #6
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It's great that we all have different tastes.They may be very good boats but to me they are just pig ugly.
They seemed to be loved by all that own one by I cant help thinking they are a bit dull. Probably very practical but not a pretty boat. The Santorin at 46ft is very slow compared to our 44 ft Van de Stadt even though both are ketches. I wouldnt swap my Trintella for one
Great boats. NB All are ketches AFAIK.
.
Small correction needed. The Santorin is quite quick and if you want a faster Santorin, Amel built many as sloops. Apparently, those are quite faster then the ketch version. As for being dull... not sure I agree. I own an SM (53 footer) and did 2 days in excess of 200NM/Day and 4 days in excess of 190NM/Day during our Transat in Dec 16. Additionally, during a violent squall of 55 knots, we surfed at 17.1 knots without much fuss. If being dull is synonymous to safe, I'll take it thank you.
But the worst point on my boat is it's inability to point... but she is meant to sail downwind around our planet.
Fair winds.
Sadly there is not a new 43-45ft Amel. Were there one I would be sore tempted to get a pure cruiser. They are the benchmark of practicality.