Resolution
Well-Known Member
In answer to the Op's general question about industry-wide attitude to aftersales I suspect it all comes down to economics. I think the builder needs innovate desirable new product and to build efficiently so they can leave enough margin in the sale for the dealer to make a decent slug. Then the dealer needs to take a long term, no nickel and diming attitude when it comes to service and warranty work on the basis that if they keep the customer happy they'll likely buy another boat in a few year's time - in which case a few man days and Easyjet flights are absolutely insignificant. Let alone if they start telling their mates about the excellent service they've received etc (or post positive stories on popular forums) So the whole thing becomes a virtuous circle that is being funded 100% from a big fat healthy boat sales line. Of course it quickly becomes a vicious circle if you start to p**s customers off by being small minded and quibbling about stuff which seems to be the case with some dealers and manufacturers...
Good analysis, IMHO. I spent several years in a major yacht dealership where the manufacturer kept dealer margins so tight that there was never any realistic chance of breaking up to the virtuous circle. Not a pleasant situation.
Some other points to consider:
1. Reliability - we are used to cars and many other products that are mostly put together by robots and hence nearly fault-free. Yachts and motor boats have become far more complex in recent years, with more and more sophisticated kit, yet still mostly installed by (fallible) human hand. Are our expectations of reliability too high?
2. Geography - it is a real logistical problem when the boat is moved away from the vicinity of the dealer from whom the boat was purchased. Who should pay the extra cost of flying out decent engineers? Or should there be a discount on sales price if a buyer undertakes to keep the boat close to the dealer?
(No business connection now with any dealers. retired and away sailing.)