kof
Active member
I think we're all debating the wrong thing here. The real question is what type of anchor will they use and why?
I think we're all debating the wrong thing here. The real question is what type of anchor will they use and why?
We are not allowed to debate anything political here anymore so that rules out "Fisherman" or "Plough"I think we're all debating the wrong thing here. The real question is what type of anchor will they use and why?
Yes, and what time of day, whether Her Maj was on board. A load of nonsense. It was quite noticeable that the crew (officers and men) had far more elaborate rituals and fancier accommodation than the royal family.Guess the Royal Marines had to have many uniforms to suit the various different Temperatures that the Royal Yacht ventured to ! Plus what tunes they played or whether marching or not !
Boris will want a bigger Boris One.I don't think so. That is a compelling reason to do it.
When you owe ten thousand pounds you've got a problem (solved by rinsing your party donors).The country has taken on levels of debt that can not be paid for in any meaningful time frame.
Not as silly as dressing up in one's wife's scanties , clubbing a fox to death with a baseball bat, then tweeting about it ?
Boris wants his boat for Carrie to flounce in when they take it on holiday to the Caribbean at a donor's lucrative taxpayers contract
Frankly, building a national ship that is smaller and no more luxurious than many mega yachts around on the seas today is pointless. We have lots of smart embassies; what's wrong with using them for impressing the locals? As mentioned above, this is an idea 50 years out of date, and requiring skills that no longer exist in the UK. The only purpose of the ship is to pander to the baying classes.