jdc
Well-Known Member
What's wrong with W Scotland?
There are people who enjoy complete solitude and privation - one guy even over-wintered in Antarctica on his own - but unless you're one of them, a consideration is probably what is there to do or see, and the possibility of occasional human interaction. That would keep me away from anywhere which is totally shut up for the winter, which is most of Scandanavia (where there's not a body around from mid August through to the following May in my experience!).
So you need:
(i) a permanent population,
(ii) some maritime activity, probably fishing, and
(iii) some tourism even in winter (so pubs and restaurants stay open).
You could do worse for all this than stay in the west of Scotland!
Lots of deep inlets to explore which one usually passes by in summer, and although more exposed places like Kyle take in their pontoons, most pubs are open, and there are villages and small towns and the weather is quite well forecast. Both Caledonian and Crinan canals still operate after a fashion. Lots of winter walking when the weather is too bad to sail.
This last point is a real consideration. It's damnably difficult to go for a walk in Sweden or Denmark, or most of France for that matter, whereas almost anywhere in Scotland can be accessed on foot from a boat, or by bus or train and thence on foot. Perhaps 50 Munros are accessible by boat with a reasonable walk-in, and the numbers of people on them will be perfect; that is to say few enough that you are no way crowded, but just enough that should you have an accident your bleached bones are not discovered only in spring (and, more pertinently, the pubs and hotels are still open in winter).
There are people who enjoy complete solitude and privation - one guy even over-wintered in Antarctica on his own - but unless you're one of them, a consideration is probably what is there to do or see, and the possibility of occasional human interaction. That would keep me away from anywhere which is totally shut up for the winter, which is most of Scandanavia (where there's not a body around from mid August through to the following May in my experience!).
So you need:
(i) a permanent population,
(ii) some maritime activity, probably fishing, and
(iii) some tourism even in winter (so pubs and restaurants stay open).
You could do worse for all this than stay in the west of Scotland!
Lots of deep inlets to explore which one usually passes by in summer, and although more exposed places like Kyle take in their pontoons, most pubs are open, and there are villages and small towns and the weather is quite well forecast. Both Caledonian and Crinan canals still operate after a fashion. Lots of winter walking when the weather is too bad to sail.
This last point is a real consideration. It's damnably difficult to go for a walk in Sweden or Denmark, or most of France for that matter, whereas almost anywhere in Scotland can be accessed on foot from a boat, or by bus or train and thence on foot. Perhaps 50 Munros are accessible by boat with a reasonable walk-in, and the numbers of people on them will be perfect; that is to say few enough that you are no way crowded, but just enough that should you have an accident your bleached bones are not discovered only in spring (and, more pertinently, the pubs and hotels are still open in winter).