Neeves
Well-Known Member
A reason for not using a stretchy line, and stretchy does not necessarily mean nylon, but something with less stretch, is that the cones nearest the vessel can suffer damage. To my mind this suggests the cones nearest the vessel are doing their job, doing that job preferentially over the cones further away and instead of damning the line, without thought, is a reason to look at how this 'failure' might be better used - one example being stronger cones nearest the vessel
The other thought is a hybrid line - something with stretch to take the snatch loads and then attach that section to a tail of dyneema to reduce weight.
The figures being quoted underline - you really need to look at the chain plates if you are going to deploy a drogue. You cannot have a drogue and ignore all the consequences. Thinwater contributed to a thread on chain plates, somewhere - I don't recall where, but it would be CF or here, Try searching with 'chain plates' and 'drogues'
Jonathan
The other thought is a hybrid line - something with stretch to take the snatch loads and then attach that section to a tail of dyneema to reduce weight.
The figures being quoted underline - you really need to look at the chain plates if you are going to deploy a drogue. You cannot have a drogue and ignore all the consequences. Thinwater contributed to a thread on chain plates, somewhere - I don't recall where, but it would be CF or here, Try searching with 'chain plates' and 'drogues'
Jonathan
