NealB
Well-known member
Otherwise what would I read. .....
QUOTE]
I find some books are good to read (often much better than magazines).
Otherwise what would I read. .....
QUOTE]
I find some books are good to read (often much better than magazines).
I find some books are good to read (often much better than magazines).
Often the case when books have hundreds of pages to enthral and capture the reader, taking them off to far away places, in YM they get 6 if they are lucky .....Could you imagine reading Desperate Voyage in Yachting Monthly, and it having the same impact?
Both have their place, but books won't replace magazines and vice versa
It has to be said there are also a large number of self-published books, some of which really should have been
(Can I go back on the Christmas card list now, please?)
Have a look at Garmin. They are really good in bright sunlight.
I have switched to the ipad version and I read the articles in text only mode.
Except if Snooks has taken the pictures of course.
Not a peep about Snooks cover design - I guess that's why he hasn't been appointed Editor yet... Perhaps if Saucy Sally sailed round the horn she'd get her own thread on Scuttlebutt!Wot? Like this?
I would suspect the reason for that is in convincing advertisers to pay for space on an on-line publication.
But this months edition is very close indeed to stopping me buying it again:
[Pedantic mode on]
Hurrumph.....I think you'll find that Slarty Bartfast was responsible for the "crinkly bits round Norway" when the Earth was constructed. His skill with a camera was never documented I think?
[Pedantic mode off]
Sorry, couldn't resist! Do all your technical staff come from the Hitch Hiker's Guide??
Wot? Like this?
I suspect I'm the only person who cares about accuracy in mags, and I hardly ever buy so I doubt YM will miss the pittance they would have made out of me. So in the grand scheme of things it won't matter to them. (Which is sad in itself.)
You're not. Everyone here at YM cares about accuracy, but some times errors get through,
My phone won't read the barcode. :-(
You're not. Everyone here at YM cares about accuracy, but some times errors get through, in YM we have the writer, the deputy editor, the editor, the sub/production editor, and then it's read one last time by Maxine who's been on the magazine longer than anyone would dare to remind her even so errors get though. That's not to excuse errors though, but it gives you an idea of how many times something is read before it's printed.
Occasionally errors in the copy, are taken out and put in again by someone else...unfortunately we're not all omniscient. Some one will change one thing, that will then get changed to make the copy fit and in the end with the emphasis shifted slightly.
As an example: one of my features I wrote about installing a windlass that "It's possible to use welding cable" it got changed to "I used welding cable" there was obviously over matter that needed cutting down so the text would fit the page. I didn't notice the change until it came out in print.
We do try to get the magazine error free, we don't put them in on purpopse
But those who know anything about risk management know that that isn't the best way to go; surely. The more people that are responsible for checking, the less attention each individual pays.
Swiss Cheese anyone?
But those who know anything about risk management know that that isn't the best way to go; surely. The more people that are responsible for checking, the less attention each individual pays.
Swiss Cheese anyone?
Yeah, but Keiran Flatt's foreign law article wasn't just a few errors sneaking through. It was hundreds of words that he must have just guessed from half remembered rumour or maybe from an old foreign book. Either way it had not been fact checked. It wasn't a mistake, it was more of a case of "Oh s***, I've got 2000 words to write and no time to research, I'll just write whatever pops into my head and hope nobody notices.". And nobody did - until it got published.