Crabman
Well-Known Member
Why are yacht brokers exspensive . 8% commision ? What qualifications are required to become a yacht broker?
3-5% is more realistic and being offered by many. I still think it's too much but hey, it's a "marine" business.
Why are yacht brokers exspensive . 8% commision ? What qualifications are required to become a yacht broker?
. Remember they only get paid when the deal is done.
Sorry Tranona got to correct you there.... IF the deal is done.![]()
BOATMATCH offer a set 4% rate for a succesful sale. Headline figure on their website and it is a knowledgable team...
What like handing you a set of keys and waving you in vaguely the right direction?I think the internet is a superb tool for communications between buyers and sellers in general, and I suspect that the Boatmatch team are proficient in the sometimes awful business of negotiation and documentation of the sale itself. But they cannot provide all the physical services that brokers with a dockside presence can.
So what qualifications are required to become a yacht broker?
.
Here's an example.
Nice clean boat, worth about £100k. Owner not desparate to sell, so offers it up for £110k. Broker works his butt off but never gets a high enough offer. Broker persuades the owner to lower his price and after a dozen accompanied viewings he eventaully sells for £100k.
Next boat less smart. Worth £300k, but the owner wants his cash quickly. Puts it up at £250k. Lots of interest and the first to view it offers £200k. Owner decides to take the offer.
..
I sold my previous boat through a broker. It cost me a few % and at the time I felt it was a lot of money for the time that they actually spent on it.
However, they did find the buyer in the first place. It was their presence on the internet, investment into search engine keywords, and willingness to take phone calls from lots of tire-kickers that enabled a deal to happen.
So, I am happy to pay, but I do not believe a percentage is the right way to calculate a fee. The amount of work done it not neccessarily proportionate to the price of the boat, so why should the fee be?
Here's an example.
Nice clean boat, worth about £100k. Owner not desparate to sell, so offers it up for £110k. Broker works his butt off but never gets a high enough offer. Broker persuades the owner to lower his price and after a dozen accompanied viewings he eventaully sells for £100k.
Next boat less smart. Worth £300k, but the owner wants his cash quickly. Puts it up at £250k. Lots of interest and the first to view it offers £200k. Owner decides to take the offer.
Does the broker really deserve twice as much for the transaction on the second boat? I dont think so.
You could argue that this is swings and roundabouts. Yes it is. For the broker, but it is certainly not fair for the owner.
I would prefer a flat fee for the sale and a bonus based on performance above a certain sale price. If you are happy taking £100k it is well worth giving the broker a nice piece of the action above that. He is then incentivised to upsell your boat, as opposed to getting you to drop your price for a quick sale. Yes, he pays a small part of that drop, but so little it desnt really matter.