Yacht at anchor East Head !!

First case to appear in court
Woman who flouted coronavirus rules at Newcastle Central Station fined £660
A woman has been ordered to pay hundreds of pounds for flouting Government coronavirus restrictions in Newcastle.
Marie Dinou was arrested by a British Transport Police (BTP) officer following an incident at Newcastle Central Station on Saturday 28, March.
The 41-year-old, of Oak Tree Close, York, was then charged with failing to comply with requirements imposed under the Coronavirus Act 2020.
Her case was heard at North Tyneside Magistrates' Court on Monday.
She was fined £660 and ordered to pay a £66 victim surcharge as well as court costs of £85
 
During my daily walk I can see a Yacht has arrived and is at anchor at East Head. Looking on AIS she is from Ramsgate maybe via Eastbourne area .
I have friends coming back from the Caribbean, because things were getting "interesting", can you let me know when they arrive. Thanks.
 
Ex-Suprem-Court judge Lord Sumption commented yesterday that Derbyshire police had ‘shamed our policing traditions’ and had turned themselves into ‘glorified school prefects’.

p89wf4l.png


Taken from Durham Constabulary's website: https://www.durham.police.uk/About-Us/Documents/Peels_Principles_Of_Law_Enforcement.pdf
 
Absolutely not. You can't have people using the might of the law to enforce their own prejudices and opinions.
Why not, you seem not to have a problem posting prejudices & opinions on here.
I don't and can't use the might of the law to enforce by opinions and prejudices, and quite right too. Those who can and do use the might of the law should not allow their personal biases to affect their work.
 
I don't and can't use the might of the law to enforce by opinions and prejudices, and quite right too. Those who can and do use the might of the law should not allow their personal biases to affect their work.


Although, if you were given a load of medals and an African Dictatorship to go with them, you might :whistle:
 
So, if they see someone in danger, they shouldn't act or warn them, because there is no law to that effect?
Police defend drowning death case
BBC NEWS | England | Manchester | Police defend drowning death case

Man drowned in shallow lake after firefighters 'not allowed' to rescue him
Man drowned in shallow lake after firefighters 'not allowed' to rescue him


Paramedic and police officer offered to jump in to save dying Simon Burgess but they were ordered not to
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2104935/Fire-chief-told-policeman-leave-drowning-man-3ft-deep-lake-half-boot-deep.html
 
Police defend drowning death case
BBC NEWS | England | Manchester | Police defend drowning death case

Man drowned in shallow lake after firefighters 'not allowed' to rescue him
Man drowned in shallow lake after firefighters 'not allowed' to rescue him


Paramedic and police officer offered to jump in to save dying Simon Burgess but they were ordered not to
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2104935/Fire-chief-told-policeman-leave-drowning-man-3ft-deep-lake-half-boot-deep.html
What has that to do with the authorities enforcing their 'Duty of Care' to employees?
 
That the police cannot make up the law as they go along?
That is pretty much what it says yes, which is why I was surprised you used it to support your argument that they had acted outside the law. You haven't yet produced an example or evidence to support your argument have you?

Enforcing the law is just one of the tools the police have available to achieve their objective. They still retain the discretion to use the law as and when their judgement thinks fit. I suspect you may have benefited from that far more than you realise. Not nicking someone just because you can is not acting outside the law.
 
A new member, wading into the forums like a pro, 500 posts in two weeks.......is this because of the 'lockdown' or and old friend returning with a new hat on...?
 
Top