wotayottie
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Taken from RYA Cruising Logbook
[ QUOTE ]
Course: Day Skipper Practical (yacht)
Suggested minimum pre-course experience: 5 days, 100 miles, 4 night hours
Assumed knowledge: Basic navigation and sailing ability
[/ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ]
I cant find this quote in my copy of the logbook (2003) but the RYA's definition of basic navigation skills as shown by the BNS course does not include course to steer. Nor does it include EPs. You might argue that it should, but it doesnt.
Nor as one commentator said does the RYA system allow for practical DS instructors to exclude those who have not done a DS shorebased. The DS practical is described in the Instructors Handbook as a "beginners course which does for skippers what the competent crew course does for crew. ............ People who have never skippered a yacht should attend this course................... min pre course experience is that which would be gained on a compe crew course ......... nav ability should be that required to draw an EP (there's consistency for you) "
The book goes on to say "over estimation of ability is not too much of a problem on this course" !
I sympathise with the practical instructor who has to teach students at different standards, but the RYA course scheme is so sloppy that this is inevitable even if candidates dont lie about their background. IMHO it should be an absolute requirement that candidates have done the theory course but it isnt at the mo and you should not demand it.
The whole issue isnt helped because there are no clear pass standards for DS theory anyway. At my instructors course it was made clear to me (amongst many other things) that the DS theory was a beginners course and to encourage people to progress we should not fail candidates except where they had poor attendance / poor committment to the course (or very rarely they were complete and utter numpties). In other words, doing an incorrrect EP or CTS was not a fail. As it happens, all understood them or the course was simply extended until they did, but this approach cant be taken in a commercial environment.
I reckon the RYA does a damn good job for sailors and the training scheme is a damn good scheme. But maybe its time for the overall course structure to be reviewed, simplified, and made both more consistent and a bit more rigorous.
Taken from RYA Cruising Logbook
[ QUOTE ]
Course: Day Skipper Practical (yacht)
Suggested minimum pre-course experience: 5 days, 100 miles, 4 night hours
Assumed knowledge: Basic navigation and sailing ability
[/ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ]
I cant find this quote in my copy of the logbook (2003) but the RYA's definition of basic navigation skills as shown by the BNS course does not include course to steer. Nor does it include EPs. You might argue that it should, but it doesnt.
Nor as one commentator said does the RYA system allow for practical DS instructors to exclude those who have not done a DS shorebased. The DS practical is described in the Instructors Handbook as a "beginners course which does for skippers what the competent crew course does for crew. ............ People who have never skippered a yacht should attend this course................... min pre course experience is that which would be gained on a compe crew course ......... nav ability should be that required to draw an EP (there's consistency for you) "
The book goes on to say "over estimation of ability is not too much of a problem on this course" !
I sympathise with the practical instructor who has to teach students at different standards, but the RYA course scheme is so sloppy that this is inevitable even if candidates dont lie about their background. IMHO it should be an absolute requirement that candidates have done the theory course but it isnt at the mo and you should not demand it.
The whole issue isnt helped because there are no clear pass standards for DS theory anyway. At my instructors course it was made clear to me (amongst many other things) that the DS theory was a beginners course and to encourage people to progress we should not fail candidates except where they had poor attendance / poor committment to the course (or very rarely they were complete and utter numpties). In other words, doing an incorrrect EP or CTS was not a fail. As it happens, all understood them or the course was simply extended until they did, but this approach cant be taken in a commercial environment.
I reckon the RYA does a damn good job for sailors and the training scheme is a damn good scheme. But maybe its time for the overall course structure to be reviewed, simplified, and made both more consistent and a bit more rigorous.