Nigelpickin
Well-Known Member
I don't think I was missing any point, since my comparison was between two similar size boats, whose running costs would be in the same league - leaving aside the Benetti 40m, which I only mentioned to emphasize the reasoning, of course.
Mind, I accept that the older boat is likely to need some refitting and/or more extraordinary maintenance, but there's a helluva lot of room for that, with an almost tenfold price difference...!
In fact, you could probably customize the "old" boat even more than the new one.
All that aside, it's easy to see how an old SL82 withstood the time test: it's sufficient to have a look at one built some 20 years ago.
And if you never did, trust me, you'd be impressed.
Otoh, how well a brand new SL78 will withstand the next 20 years, that's anyone's guess, of course.
But assuming that both boats are properly looked after, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the 82, which would be 40yo by then, would be in a comparable shape (if not even better!), compared to the by then 20yo 78...
I’m willing to accept that I’m not making my point to a standard that is understandable but were it that I was, you would be in agreement
Point is that your ‘blowable amount’ and your available income come from different budget areas - so I can afford that SL and perhaps the new one, at a push, if we sold the kids - but I could not afford to run either of them without bankrupting my daily allowance.
So for example, we try to keep the cost of our habit go around £25k per year*, (not including depreciation), and we had anything from 0 to 1m€ available for our ‘round the world’ boat, so we could have got the 52’ version nearly new and would have loved to have done so - but we couldn’t affford to run it - based on our budget.
So we bought the best example of a 45’ version - which happens to be new and affordable to run, for us.
So I guess - based on my line of thinking - there’s going to be more distressed stock and thus more depreciation at the longer end of the market - no? And I’d ask again, how many folk who can afford to run an 80’ SL would really want a 10’yrar old model? It must be a tough sell surely?
*never managed to keep within budget but that’s the figure Ann says we can spend - I might have to break out the Rohypnol when she sees what I’m planning to spend when we arrive in Miami..
And in line with some other comments, is cost to change New to New really that much more than Used to Used? I’d be interested to see some real life numbers from others for me circa 1.8m expenditure on new boats has cost around 200k in the exchange process, over 10 years - so as a percentage that’s not too shocking?
Ultimarely I kind of think that the ‘I never buy new’ and ‘I never buy old’ stand points enjoy a lot less logic than the ‘I never buy boats’ one.