White Marine Diesel

wizard

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 Jan 2003
Messages
1,729
Location
Portland
Visit site
Following on from the endless red diesel discussions - does anyone know of any suppliers for boats that sell white fame free marine diesel?
 
Doubt it; the EU Renewable Fuel Transport Obligation (RTFO in euro-bureau lingo) as I understand it specifies a mandatory target for renewable fuels. This used to be around 6%, increased to 7.25% this April, will go up again to 8.5% in Jan 2019 and on upwards from there. That said, some countries have got around this once one can prove said diesel is not intended for road use, but obviously no duty concessions. Perhaps they cld do a special FAME-free white for vegans, but you'd have to give up the steak first :D
 
Last edited:
Following on from the endless red diesel discussions - does anyone know of any suppliers for boats that sell white fame free marine diesel?

See post #93 http://www.ybw.com/forums/showthread.php?509650-Red-Diesel-UK-Government-loses/page10

Bru (of this parish) points out that the legal obligation to add a percentage of bio-diesel only applies to road fuel. It isn’t a law that applies to marine supplies. Until there is demand I doubt very much we’ll see FAME free white at the dockside. Just not worth it for the suppliers.
 
Last edited:
Doubt it; the EU Renewable Fuel Transport Obligation (RTFO in euro-bureau lingo) as I understand it specifies a mandatory target for renewable fuels. This used to be around 6%, increased to 7.25% this April, will go up again to 8.5% in Jan 2019 and on upwards from there. That said, some countries have got around this once one can prove said diesel is not intended for road use, but obviously no duty concessions.

My understanding is that the % mandated is (or was?) aggregated over the whole market for any particular supplier. So 0% is permitted, balanced by some at a higher percentage than stipulated. But perhaps I'm wrong?
 
What I don’t understand is that our current red diesel is fame free with added dye. Why not just remove the dye.

All is as before and eventually we all turn white.
 
My understanding is that the % mandated is (or was?) aggregated over the whole market for any particular supplier. So 0% is permitted, balanced by some at a higher percentage than stipulated. But perhaps I'm wrong?
Dunno, you may be right in that according to the legislation, "Under the RTFO, fuel suppliers have an obligation to provide a volume of sustainable renewable fuel which is calculated as a proportion of the overall volume of fuel they supply for road transport and NRMM purposes." That said seagoing vessels are explicitly excluded from the NRMM definition (non road mobile machinery), so if one could prove................. might be more hassle than its worth though.
 
What I don’t understand is that our current red diesel is fame free with added dye. Why not just remove the dye.

All is as before and eventually we all turn white.


‘Cos most of it goes to fishing vessels which are entitled to use it under EU law. Having a separate outfit (production, delivery, tankage, pumps) for FAME free white is going to be cited by the industry as a pain in the arse.
 
‘Cos most of it goes to fishing vessels which are entitled to use it under EU law. Having a separate outfit (production, delivery, tankage, pumps) for FAME free white is going to be cited by the industry as a pain in the arse.

Well the goverment or somebody is going to have to come up with something or else very few boats will be able to go anywhere in the EU!
 
My understanding is that the % mandated is (or was?) aggregated over the whole market for any particular supplier. So 0% is permitted, balanced by some at a higher percentage than stipulated. But perhaps I'm wrong?

You're not wrong :)

What I don’t understand is that our current red diesel is fame free with added dye. Why not just remove the dye..

As I pointed out in the other thread, unless it is explicitly sold as FAME free, there's no guarantee that your "red" diesel hasn't got an unknown proportion of FAME in it and due to the aggregation mentioned above the chances are it probably has
 
Posted on another thread;

I sent an email yesterday to the Harbour Master at Ramsgate. Here is his reply, self explanatory really.

Good morning Karl

Thank you for your enquiry.

We presently serve three fuels for leisure vessels at Ramsgate from our own fuel barge; these are FAME free red marine gas oil, white diesel (not FAME free) and unleaded petrol.

We're hoping that in line with the recent ruling, the industry will soon be in a position to be able to provide FAME free white diesel.
Kind regards



Robert Brown.



Harbour Master & Marine Operations Manager
 
Just seen this in the red diesel thread from Champagne Murphy:

I sent an email yesterday to the Harbour Master at Ramsgate. Here is his reply, self explanatory really.

Good morning Karl

Thank you for your enquiry.

We presently serve three fuels for leisure vessels at Ramsgate from our own fuel barge; these are FAME free red marine gas oil, white diesel (not FAME free) and unleaded petrol.

We're hoping that in line with the recent ruling, the industry will soon be in a position to be able to provide FAME free white diesel.
Kind regards



Robert Brown.



Harbour Master & Marine Operations Manager



So maybe there is hope ...
 
Well the goverment or somebody is going to have to come up with something or else very few boats will be able to go anywhere in the EU!

Why? Tens of thousands of leisure boats run on white road diesel (as we have done for 10+ years) all across Europe without any problems whatsoever. Fuel worries remind me of the y2k unfounded panic.
 
Why? Tens of thousands of leisure boats run on white road diesel (as we have done for 10+ years) all across Europe without any problems whatsoever. Fuel worries remind me of the y2k unfounded panic.

I have had no problem getting white diesel abroad either. The problem is getting the white diesel to a pump near the boat. I dont fancy lugging 155l of diesel to my boat in cans on a regular basis.
 
Why? Tens of thousands of leisure boats run on white road diesel (as we have done for 10+ years) all across Europe without any problems whatsoever. Fuel worries remind me of the y2k unfounded panic.

As someone who had to work on the y2k problem, can I say that it WASN'T unfounded? Hard work by vast numbers of people avoided the problem - but it often involved the complete replacement of systems that weren't and couldn't be made y2k. For example, we had a perfectly adequate financial system that had been tailored over the years to fit our requirements very well. Unfortunately, it handled dates in a way that was a) unfixable and b) would have resulted in transactions posted after 31/12/1999 being 100 year overdue! We ended up spending man-years of effort and considerable extra costs in training and purchasing to avert it. Because running Antarctic bases is a 24/7/365 operation, we also had people on duty on 31/12/1999 to 01/01/2000 just to ensure that nothing failed - it didn't, but that was because people had made sure it wouldn't. not because there wasn't a problem.

Yes, there was press hysteria about totally impossible effects (there was never a serious question that car electronics would stop working, for example), but don't get the impression it wasn't a problem. And in fact, there was a case a month or so ago where a rarely active system erroneously gave warning of an earthquake BECAUSE of a Y2K bug!
 
I have always thought that the UK's stance on red is dishonest. The real problem is that our road fuel is priced way above that of our neighbours, so asking yachts to pay that was going to be a problem since they can reasonably go elsewhere to fill up. The EU actually asked only that 330 euros tax be applied per 1000 litres of fuel, whereas the UK chages at least double this for road fuel, hence the 60/40 split thing. But it's an MP's expenses 'solution', that is to say the practice is ok - make some payment system about right, be it our diesel or the MP's salaries - but the principle is dishonest and dodging the real issue. No surprise it's fallen on its face. Shame on the RYA, PBO and Motorboat Monthly for their part in a conspiracy to commit perjury.

Other countries have no issues with white fuel for yachts, red for fishing boats, and of course everyone knows there are no canals in France, Holland or Belgium. It's simply lying to claim that our situation is unique: Iceland, in the remotest hamlet on the N coast for God's sake, manages to have both pumps at the quay side. It's preposterous to say that it couldn't be done in the Solent, or even in Mallaig(1). On the subject of Iceland's fuel, 100% duty paid white diesel in Iceland - an otherwise eye-wateringly expensive place - is less than red diesel in the UK even when one claims the 60/40 split. This is the real 'rip-off UK' and the real problem. Let's direct our ire where it's merited.

(1) Just to check this, since I have red diesel in tanks at my farm I asked the supplier if I could also have a white tank. 'No problem sir, minimum order 250 litres (less my boat's tanks), no extra delivery charge'. `Too hard to organise' my ar%e.
 
Last edited:
I have had no problem getting white diesel abroad either. The problem is getting the white diesel to a pump near the boat. I dont fancy lugging 155l of diesel to my boat in cans on a regular basis.

I think it is safe to say that when (if?) the government admits defeat and bans marked fuel for leisure craft, at least one marina in every major sailing area will either convert a pump to white or install a new one. It is not a particularly expensive thing to do and well worth it if it helps them to retain a couple of dozen berth holders.

The problem until now has been a perception amongst marina operators that the demand for unmarked diesel is very low. I spoke to the management of one of the MDL marinas on the subject a few years ago and they told me that there was already a spare tank installed together with most of the piping to the fuel pontoon. They could have been up and running selling unmarked fuel within a few weeks and at a very low cost - they were not bothering to do so until the government actually banned marked fuel because they didn't think they could sell enough to justify the work.

This may be very different for leisure sailors in distant places who only have the commercial fuel outlets available. That will be a problem for them and we should be sympathetic, but the impact on the UK leisure boating community will be small - let's face it - 90% of that population is based in and around the Solent and could be served by a single marina fuel berth offering white.
 
I was under the impression, though I could be very wrong, that modern high power, common rail, emission controlled engines were not happy on red and much preferred white to the extent that marinas were already stocking white (or calling in tankers for big mobos).
 
Top