Nautical
Well-Known Member
Re: What\'s going to happen ? (Shaft v Outdrives)
What you have to factor in is................
It is the efficiency of the drive unit that makes the savings over shafts not the engines eg...........for shaft drive boats to get the same peformance of say a mid 40' sports cruiser on outdrives you need around 500hp per lump as oppossed to around twin 350hp on drives. I am no maths guru but twin 350's on drives burn around 75 litres an hour (both), twin 500's on shafts around 110 litres an hour (both) so if fuel tax goes on that is a whooping extra cost just to have shafts. Factor in also that drives are way cheaper to install than shafts... and because of lower labour cost to install and smaller engines you can talk about £40 - £50K difference in the retail price of 42' sports cruiser..... that buys you an awful lot of servicing over the years. As far as reliability is concerned the latest units from all the manufacturers are yonks ahead of those from even 10 years ago.
Add of course (for sports orientated boats anyway) drives are loads more fun to drive with much more responsive steering, all in all much more chuckable.
IPS is the way things are heading for bigger boats, nearly all the med yards have new boats on the drawing board for IPS, us Brits are way behind the race on this one. Nearly every major yard around the med will be launching new boats next season with IPS. Some are dropping or not even designing in the ability for shaft drive installation.
The savings as you start to move up the power range and size of boat fitted with IPS really do start to make shafts look very expensive to run indeed, at around 55' the fuel burn for IPS600 will be around 60% of similar shaft drive installation. When you are looking at burning 160 litres an hour that is bags fulls of cash.
You pays your money and takes your choice as they say but shafts won't be getting any of mine, its too blooming hard to earn without throwing it away as well.
What you have to factor in is................
It is the efficiency of the drive unit that makes the savings over shafts not the engines eg...........for shaft drive boats to get the same peformance of say a mid 40' sports cruiser on outdrives you need around 500hp per lump as oppossed to around twin 350hp on drives. I am no maths guru but twin 350's on drives burn around 75 litres an hour (both), twin 500's on shafts around 110 litres an hour (both) so if fuel tax goes on that is a whooping extra cost just to have shafts. Factor in also that drives are way cheaper to install than shafts... and because of lower labour cost to install and smaller engines you can talk about £40 - £50K difference in the retail price of 42' sports cruiser..... that buys you an awful lot of servicing over the years. As far as reliability is concerned the latest units from all the manufacturers are yonks ahead of those from even 10 years ago.
Add of course (for sports orientated boats anyway) drives are loads more fun to drive with much more responsive steering, all in all much more chuckable.
IPS is the way things are heading for bigger boats, nearly all the med yards have new boats on the drawing board for IPS, us Brits are way behind the race on this one. Nearly every major yard around the med will be launching new boats next season with IPS. Some are dropping or not even designing in the ability for shaft drive installation.
The savings as you start to move up the power range and size of boat fitted with IPS really do start to make shafts look very expensive to run indeed, at around 55' the fuel burn for IPS600 will be around 60% of similar shaft drive installation. When you are looking at burning 160 litres an hour that is bags fulls of cash.
You pays your money and takes your choice as they say but shafts won't be getting any of mine, its too blooming hard to earn without throwing it away as well.