ari
Well-Known Member
Re: What\'s considered to be too many engine hours?
[ QUOTE ]
I've been looking at a few Sealine 310s and Fairline Targas recently of around 1995 vintage and some seem to have very high engine hours e.g. 1400hrs. The engines are the likes of D3's and KAD32's and it's got me wondering if this is considered excessive. I'm only likely to put 80-100 hrs a year on them myself and the boats themselves are at a fair price. What do you guys think? Too high or do these engines 'go on forever'? (I'd obviously check their service records)
[/ QUOTE ]
And to answer the original question, there is no such thing as a leisure boat with "excessive hours". They all have very low hours, or even less.
Trying to compare a boat with 1,000 hours with one with 500 hours is like comparing a car with 4,000 miles to one with 2,000 miles. Yes one has half the mileage, but they're both very low in reality.
Worry about how they've been looked after more. Diesel engines like to be used.
[ QUOTE ]
I've been looking at a few Sealine 310s and Fairline Targas recently of around 1995 vintage and some seem to have very high engine hours e.g. 1400hrs. The engines are the likes of D3's and KAD32's and it's got me wondering if this is considered excessive. I'm only likely to put 80-100 hrs a year on them myself and the boats themselves are at a fair price. What do you guys think? Too high or do these engines 'go on forever'? (I'd obviously check their service records)
[/ QUOTE ]
And to answer the original question, there is no such thing as a leisure boat with "excessive hours". They all have very low hours, or even less.
Trying to compare a boat with 1,000 hours with one with 500 hours is like comparing a car with 4,000 miles to one with 2,000 miles. Yes one has half the mileage, but they're both very low in reality.
Worry about how they've been looked after more. Diesel engines like to be used.