skipmac
Well-Known Member
The downside was explained in post 2. Paper uses 4 times the energy to make, and chucks out some nasty chemicals in the process. If every little bit helps, we should be looking at the overall process, not just getting worked up about plastic.
And my rebuttal to that was also posted but I'll repeat and summarize
1. Paper biodegrades in short order.
2. Plastic NEVER biodegrades. It breaks down into smaller particles that enter the food chain and your body.
3. Making paper does generate toxic wastes but this is a point source generation which is much, much easier to address than the dispersed waste and pollution from plastic trash. And the wastes from paper production have been reduced a lot already and work continues to reduce it further.
4. Making paper is energy intensive but have you considered the total energy costs of the production chain to make plastic? Oil exploration, drilling and production, all use energy and the later two both use lots of toxic chemicals as well. Then transportation of the oil from wells to refineries, then cracking the oil, separating and refining the components (that also generates a lot of toxic wastes) to produced ethylene, propylene, butandiene, styrene, etc that are the monomers to produce the various polymers we call plastics. All of those steps also use energy.
5. Paper is from a renewable resource, trees and in some cases biomass. In the US there are millions of acres of trees that are farmed to produce paper and lumber. That and wild trees from second growth forests accounts for over 90% of the paper produced.
6. Oil is made from a finite resource, oil and gas. One day they will run out.