Weight of small outboards

C08

Well-known member
Joined
8 Feb 2013
Messages
3,884
Visit site
Looking at new 2.5hp 4stroke engines it appears that (say) Mariner/Yamaha weigh in at 17kg but the Suzuki is only 13.5kg. Where have the corners been cut - is the Suzuki a decent small engine that is expected to have a long life?
 

Flica

New member
Joined
25 Jan 2013
Messages
275
Visit site
Suzuki produce the lightest 2.5hp 4-stroke motor. Unlike Tohatsu (who produce small OBs for re-badging for the other manufacturers), it is a stand alone 68cc power head. Tohatsu (Mariner and Mercury) use the same unit @ 123cc for the 2.5 and the 3.5 hp models. Relative weights are 13.15kg for Suzuki and 18.4kg for the 2.5/3.5hp Tohatsu.
I prefer to stick with the 2-stroke 3.5 Tohatsu (forbidden to be offered for sale in EC chandlers) @ 14.8kg.
Those users in Med waters with the Suzuki appear moderately happy - starting problems and non-progressive throttle opening appear to be the more common complaints. It is, however, comparitively light. The major difference between 2.5 and 3.5hp Tohatsu is that the latter has a stainless steel waterpump and therefore a more extended life.
If you want a 2-stroke, Mainbrayce on Alderney and a number of Maltese chandlers have them on offer.
 

steve66

Well-known member
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Messages
918
Location
west midlands
Visit site
Suzuki produce the lightest 2.5hp 4-stroke motor. Unlike Tohatsu (who produce small OBs for re-badging for the other manufacturers), it is a stand alone 68cc power head. Tohatsu (Mariner and Mercury) use the same unit @ 123cc for the 2.5 and the 3.5 hp models. Relative weights are 13.15kg for Suzuki and 18.4kg for the 2.5/3.5hp Tohatsu.
I prefer to stick with the 2-stroke 3.5 Tohatsu (forbidden to be offered for sale in EC chandlers) @ 14.8kg.
Those users in Med waters with the Suzuki appear moderately happy - starting problems and non-progressive throttle opening appear to be the more common complaints. It is, however, comparitively light. The major difference between 2.5 and 3.5hp Tohatsu is that the latter has a stainless steel waterpump and therefore a more extended life.
If you want a 2-stroke, Mainbrayce on Alderney and a number of Maltese chandlers have them on offer.

Honda 2.3s are approximately the same weight as the Suzuki 2.5
 

Flica

New member
Joined
25 Jan 2013
Messages
275
Visit site
Honda 2.3s are approximately the same weight as the Suzuki 2.5

But of archaic design, noisy and fairly troublesome, being an air-cooled and splash-lubricated head . They are, in fact, slightly lighter than any other outboard, until you start looking at some Chinese ones!!!
Having been down the research path, I'd have chosen the Tohatsu-based 3.5hp - the world's oldest and largest manufacturer of portable outboards
 

steve66

Well-known member
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Messages
918
Location
west midlands
Visit site
But of archaic design, noisy and fairly troublesome, being an air-cooled and splash-lubricated head . They are, in fact, slightly lighter than any other outboard, until you start looking at some Chinese ones!!!
Having been down the research path, I'd have chosen the Tohatsu-based 3.5hp - the world's oldest and largest manufacturer of portable outboards

Splash lubricated or brittle plastic oil pump drive. I know which I choose
 

steve66

Well-known member
Joined
5 Sep 2011
Messages
918
Location
west midlands
Visit site
There are pros and cons with every outboard but the tohatsu based 2 stroke outboard is a very well manufactured world beater. So much so at least 2 manufacturers copied it. Only disadvantage for me against an aircooled is flushing after use
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
42,028
Location
Essex
Visit site
Low hours one for sale at a good price on the "for Sale" forum at the moment.

Both work, more or less. One deciding feature for some buyers is the Honda's centrifugal clutch, which some people dislike and others prefer. Having heard Hondas buzzing around me from over a mile away I went for the Suzuki. I find it as easy to manhandle as my old 2/stroke 2.2 because of the large handles, similar to the Honda.
 

Arcady

Active member
Joined
9 Dec 2010
Messages
650
Location
Guernsey
Visit site
Asking for opinions on small outboards is almost as entertaining as asking for opinions on different anchors :) The 2 stroke/4 stroke or air-cooled/water-cooled debate inevitably brings out the lurkers and regulars alike.

FWIW - and just to keep things moving(!) - I've had 15 years of faultless service out of our last Honda and have come to like the centrifugal clutch too. In fact I liked it so much I bought another one...
 

LONG_KEELER

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
3,721
Location
East Coast
Visit site
But of archaic design, noisy and fairly troublesome, being an air-cooled and splash-lubricated head . They are, in fact, slightly lighter than any other outboard, until you start looking at some Chinese ones!!!
Having been down the research path, I'd have chosen the Tohatsu-based 3.5hp - the world's oldest and largest manufacturer of portable outboards

Feel I have to defend the Honda 2.3. I have one and treasure it highly.

The first gender neutral outboard, with air cooling, 4 stroke with the ability to do 50 nm on one litre of fuel , and a clutch
which has probably saved countless lives. It proves that true progress only ever comes from outside the system.

Pity that originally, (mine) , had some of the stainless parts not suitable for the marine environment but would do well on a moped was unfortunate but has been put right. Dunked twice , horribly abused but still going strong.
 
Top